Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:28 pm
I got nervous I thought that was L1. I had a rough idea of how many votes on me, but I was wrong about how many it takes to kill
hey, what wagon are you on? who is currently in the front there?In post 861, Klick wrote:Hiraki: Meh. Getting mostly nothings from him. I find myself opposed to his stances and not really understanding where he's coming from. I'm hoping to see this change soon. I'd be fine with getting some pressure here.
You fail to see the town motivation in having an opinion? Can understand why it might be a bit touchy talking about your predecessor!In post 855, Klick wrote:Curious. I fail to see the town motivation in being ardently anti-townbloc - it doesn't accomplish anything to take apart townreads. I can see several angles where it's useful for scum to discredit it though.
both points about me were that you didn't like that i distrust and dislike town blocs, something that is not super radical - ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????In post 861, Klick wrote:I find myself opposed to his stances and not really understanding where he's coming from.
????????????????????????? this is upper echelon so a town read??????????In post 861, Klick wrote:Battle Mage: Espe was towny. I reeeally liked 99. Battle Mage himself is... fine? Looking forward to developing this more.
disregarding the first part, why can't scum also be frustrated with "scumhunting" that isn't working? because he's new?In post 861, Klick wrote:The traitor stuff is legit, and he's trying to scumhunt and getting frustrated that it's not working.
are you really doubting this?In post 870, Hoopla wrote:reareading this sequence of posts, there's only a 2 minute time-stamp between these two posts. is that enough time to read the last three pages to scan for votes then post again?
this took me less than 2 minutesIn post 870, Hoopla wrote:he'd have to have posted, then gone back immediately and scanned the last three pages and counted his votes - that's if he knew exactly where the last mod VC was, and wasn't spending time looking for that. also, judging by the capitalisation of these two posts compared to his iso, it looks like he's phone posting (autocorrect often capitalises for you), and his other non-capitalised posts are desktop posts. if he's on his phone, that's generally harder to navigate and scan for votes on yourself than a desktop. well, at least for me, i find it harder navigating the game on a phone...
really????In post 874, Hoopla wrote:why did you claim before knowing how many votes you were sitting on?In post 871, Emperor flippyNips wrote:I counted the most recent then ISO’d the mod then counted up to most recent again it wasn’t that hard
In post 871, Emperor flippyNips wrote:I counted the most recent then ISO’d the mod then counted up to most recent again it wasn’t that hard
In post 872, Emperor flippyNips wrote:I even did it mobile! :Lol:
^ this sequence of posts makes me believe my timing tell is not relevant. you can see he responds without thinking or even reading all of the posts in the game. that explains why he claimed without being fully aware of the game state. my intuition is that this is slightly more town-indicative, as i imagine scum to be more likely to check the game situation before compulsively locking themself into a claim - it's at least more of a consideration as scum. you just have to consider the gamestate more when you're deceiving. whereas, i find town often just compulsively spew out the truth of their role even when it's suboptimal. there's less mental barriers filtering their play (this also applies to reads and thought processes in general - the more lucid the better)In post 873, Emperor flippyNips wrote:Oh you talked about me doing it mobile already. I didn’t finish reading what you said
i was definitely doubting the timing when i first saw it. i don't now.In post 877, Hiraki wrote:are you really doubting this?
In post 220, notscience wrote:I don’t really wanna wagon una barring the weird question that’s already been asked being repeated?
In post 240, notscience wrote: I liked my interactions with una so far so leantown there
In post 562, notscience wrote: Una I honestly thought was town from his first vote on me, but he’s frankly kinda forgettable. I need to iso him
In post 775, notscience wrote: I never did get to iso una so let me do it. I still liked his early stuff
240 is especially weird. what interactions did you have with him that you liked?In post 778, notscience wrote:And I did read una but I really don’t get the case on him? I feel like more people than him have been questioning townblocking this game so what makes him so special
mmm i did.In post 889, notscience wrote:I’m assuming you used control f because I had also been referring to him as umbreonage in my iso
i only remember playing scum with him, so any time i notice something tonally from him, it's stuff matching that. i'm not well acquainted with his town meta, so i admit i have a biased lens here. maybe tomorrow show me the posts you noticed a town inflection so i can look into it more.In post 888, notscience wrote:His inflection at times just sounds town. It’s happened multiple times this game for him specifically, I can’t format on my phone but I can on the computer tomorrow if you want further elaboration, however I think most of it is touched on in my reread.
Then you haven't tried. I said plenty.In post 855, Klick wrote:I can't recall what Una thinks about anything that isn't the Traitor Problem.
Klick assumes my lynchpool is Hooplas townblock BECAUSE they are in there.In post 855, Klick wrote:Una's 519 goes back to giving me bad vibes. Una's scumreads line up exactly with Hoopla's townbloc, with everyone else going 'just below the null line' at worst. That's not natural town thought. He also has much more concrete reasons for suspecting all of notscience/Gypyx/gobble, but votes renaissance for elusive reasons.
Like said, that group is poorly formed, and just happens to include most all of my scumreads.In post 855, Klick wrote:I'm getting the vibe that if Una is scum, at least one of his partners is actually in Hoopla's townbloc.His vote has danced around enough in that groupthat there's something whack going on there.
I believe their posting has been genuine.In post 855, Klick wrote:So you've reasserted this a few times now. Why do you believe it? Hoopla herself has said she plays very similarly to this as either alignment. Yet you've fairly consistently held her as 'misguided town'. Why do you townread Hoopla?
Actually looking back now,you don't list your read on Hoopla at all in 519...
..and literally a MINUTE later..In post 185, renaissance wrote:Eh, I'm out of time actually. I liked notscience's recent interactions with me a little.
VOTE: gobbled
I'm just gonna park here with some townreads for now.
Pedit: I'll be back later!
Notice how in the same post where they vote for Gobble, they jam in the comment about notscience not being so scummy after all.