Mafiascum.net

In post 623, ClarkBar wrote:

In post 616, TheThirteenthJT wrote:I'm going through your ISO currently. But a quick summary of what I'm seeing. It is based on your stance of LL/Porkens as well as your stance on replacement players. You defend LL hard and slowly worked your way to turning on them. But you teased a vote multiple times and it wasn't until you realized you weren't the hammer that you finally jumped on the wagon. Basically it comes down that you wanted any reason to join the wagon but we're too afraid to hammer so shied away.

Yes, my opinion of LL did change, even after the claim. But several opinions of mine changed while rereading for 465 and if more clarity on my thought process is needed I'm happy to oblige.

Did I defend LL hard? I just didn't mind his push on Blopp and thought the ART was not as reachy as some were implying. I turned on him pretty fast actually. What's my stance on replacement players and why is it bad?

And I will tell you, I was excited to be the hammer. I've never done it before, I was going to post a M.C. Hammer "hammer time" gif and everything. But we had people like Looker and BM who were still catching up/giving reactions and so I was being patient. And then it turned out my vote math was wrong. If somebody claims intent I would actually request they let me unvote, then they put Pork at L-1 so I can then hammer.

In post 862, JamSV wrote:By the way, this might be a pain for some, I actually town lean Porkens. I was simply very very curious to see how a hammer would play out. One of the annoying things about when people post the minutes around their own hammer, is you can get a very good indicator of their role and alignment. I wanted to test who would actually hammer Porkens.
VOTE: ClarkBar
Sorry bud.

PS- I'm very sorry for the insults @Porkens, I wanted to make it seem more genuine.

In post 849, LicketyQuickety wrote:

I can see any one of Looker, Clark, 13 being teamed with BM.

In post 870, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Raya are you all caught up?

In post 872, Porkens wrote:

In post 867, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Porkens has been on the fence for hammering this slot for a while now and a few times looked to be close. You never called it out then but why now?

This is very weird especially for me because I do scumlean Clark more than Porkens.

So you were encouraging the player you scumread more than me to hammer me?

In post 880, Raya36 wrote:Somebody else get on the Porkens wagon

The difficulty to get this through should be telling enough

In post 882, Porkens wrote:

In post 880, Raya36 wrote:Somebody else get on the Porkens wagon

The difficulty to get this through should be telling enough

Stop you are going to make yourself look scummy and then they will get you tomorrow.

In post 884, Raya36 wrote:

In post 882, Porkens wrote:

In post 880, Raya36 wrote:Somebody else get on the Porkens wagon

The difficulty to get this through should be telling enough

Stop you are going to make yourself look scummy and then they will get you tomorrow.

I won't look scummy when you flip scum

In post 885, Porkens wrote:

In post 884, Raya36 wrote:

In post 882, Porkens wrote:

In post 880, Raya36 wrote:Somebody else get on the Porkens wagon

The difficulty to get this through should be telling enough

Stop you are going to make yourself look scummy and then they will get you tomorrow.

I won't look scummy when you flip scum

No, in that case I’d agree. I don’t think you’d bus a parter like this. I guess I could be wrong about that though. Sadly not going to work out that way.

In post 867, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Porkens has been on the fence for hammering this slot for a while now and a few times looked to be close. You never called it out then but why now?

This is very weird especially for me because I do scumlean Clark more than Porkens.

In post 886, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: porkens

You arent looking at my point here.

I've been 100% on scum voting when they've been elimnated. Hammered both times lol. I really want to continue my stream (maybe not hammering this time.)

In post 889, ClarkBar wrote:I don't understand 875.

In post 891, TheThirteenthJT wrote:I've allowed everyone to say their peace now. Jamsv you put yourself in a bad spot here at the end. You were my top town read for not waiverinf your stance.

In post 887, JamSV wrote:VOTE: Porkens
Stole it

In post 891, TheThirteenthJT wrote:I've allowed everyone to say their peace now. Jamsv you put yourself in a bad spot here at the end. You were my top town read for not waiverinf your stance.