Mafiascum.net

In post 872, Iconeum wrote:why the hell do you think i'm fighting for that claim here???

I don't know, honestly. You should have just come out and said it; there was no downside to doing so.

In post 875, Something_Smart wrote:there was no downside to doing so.

i am *not good* with mechanics and was fishing to see what i would need to do here

I hope no town thought it was a good idea to fake claim here, but the possibility is there.

well i'm definitely town and i'm definitely not fakeclaiming

you'll see as much come morning

i'm gonna go lay down now

In post 879, Datisi wrote:i'm gonna go lay down now

ur acting surprised

i don't get that

this shit literally Always happens to me

and also

i'm conftown to you weeeee

i mean, not "yet" but

i'm gonna assume for the time being you're not suicidal (as either alignment) cc'ing that

UNVOTE:

In post 876, Iconeum wrote:i am *not good* with mechanics and was fishing to see what i would need to do here

That's fair. I'm glad that I was able to get the point across to you that counterclaiming was right.

NVM, Iconeum is probably town. p-edit: What the fuck. I typed that before the claim. Now I'm just baffled.

In post 853, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 775, maxwell wrote:All right but I'm running out of patience for the aimless durdling most people produce when commenting on the setup.

I think the conversation is almost definitionally not aimless. It has a clear aim which is to answer a set of questions about optimal mechanical play; this is probably clearer than a lot of other discussions this game in terms of what the point actually is.

If you personally don't understand or care for it, that's fine. But that is not the same as it being objectively irrelevant.

Okay, now you've set me off, so let's do this. Literally your only conclusions in 724 and 745 were "buhh maybe we should follow the clear?" Which, in a general sense is unfortunately correct but hardly some startling insight and not worthy of your smarm. The blind deference to the clear also encourages passivity from town in talking about who should be inspected, which a distressingly small number of people have actually weighed in on. Even if people disagree with me I think they really should be talking about who they want to see checked. Also I can't see limiting the inspection checks to 1-2 players straight off the bat as anything but objectively pro-scum, in a game with an extremely limited number of executions it's necessary to find a way to narrow the pool and everyone fretting and whining about exposing the TD is forgetting our first goal here is to be catching scum, removing a handful of players as suspects isn't a big deal . I'm not really worried if the scum have a 1 in 5 or 1 in 6 guess at endgame. As it is checking 1 person means we'd get 5 eliminations and 4 cop checks to find 2 scum out of 3 in a pool of 15, which...actually, if I'm doing the math right, those are fairly good odds. I might might talk myself into this but I still thing having a larger check on day 1 at least accelerates the game at a fairly small added risk.

In post 864, Datisi wrote:

In post 746, maxwell wrote:621 From Datisi is a bad post.

pray tell?

Nah, I'm not gonna explain it to you.

Interesting

I was reading icon’s posts here and thinking “not sure I’m reading icon as town here unless he’s the PA” and then boom

He might as well have claimed because he was hard softing it by being sceptical of the NK15 claim

@moment why are you not townreading me?

@datisi do you think scum is pushing you or do you think you haven’t towntold yet?

NK15 needs to claim fakeclaim or no fakeclaim next time he’s in thread

In post 888, Menalque wrote:@datisi do you think scum is pushing you or do you think you haven’t towntold yet?

i don't think i have generally towntold yet but also i don't think those two are necessarily mutually exclusive

In post 889, Menalque wrote:NK15 needs to claim fakeclaim or no fakeclaim next time he’s in thread

It's way too easy for NK to try and talk his way out of it pretending to have been Shitposting


And y'all wonder why I hate shitpost meta

This is a direct counterclaim and one of them is lying.

In post 890, Datisi wrote:

In post 888, Menalque wrote:@datisi do you think scum is pushing you or do you think you haven’t towntold yet?

i don't think i have generally towntold yet but also i don't think those two are necessarily mutually exclusive

You think scum would push you after you towntold?

@username, yes obviously one is lying I just don’t know if that necessarily means the lying one is scum

Once in my homesite i saw a VT claim vig after a vig shot. When the real vig counterclaimed them and they got inevitably lynched afterwards they said they did it to "protect the real vig and make scum waste a shot on VT" and that town was dumb for lynching him.
I believe NK15 is the lying one here, but i don’t know if he’s town or scum. If town i think he’s stupid as hell. But gotta consider the possibilities. After all, i’m curious what scum would have to gain from fake claiming here if they know they’ll be CC’ed.

In post 891, username wrote:

In post 889, Menalque wrote:NK15 needs to claim fakeclaim or no fakeclaim next time he’s in thread

It's way too easy for NK to try and talk his way out of it pretending to have been Shitposting


And y'all wonder why I hate shitpost meta

This is a direct counterclaim and one of them is lying.

Yes, and the one lying was me. It was not shitposting, however. I thought post 7 might have been a mistake by the PA, that`s why I fakeclaimed, especially because the real PA didnt claim in the manner I did. If Iconeum is scum testing my claim, then well played but I can`t risk counterclaiming him because now Iconeum can direct the lynches, instead of me. Ideally, Iconeum would have claimed right at the beginning but.... well, they didnt.

I`ll post more later when I have more time, now that I no longer need to play like a claimed PA.

In post 892, Menalque wrote:

In post 890, Datisi wrote:

In post 888, Menalque wrote:@datisi do you think scum is pushing you or do you think you haven’t towntold yet?

i don't think i have generally towntold yet but also i don't think those two are necessarily mutually exclusive

You think scum would push you after you towntold?

what i said there is i think *both* could be true (i.e. me not towntelling rn and scum pushing me)

i don't think they would, unless it was the last resort

I still don't like it and we probably have to inspect or eliminate NK15 at this point.

@Not Known 15
You did it to "protect the PA" or did you fake claim to out the real PA?

Because there is a nonzero chance you did the second.

Keeping my vote here for a bit.

In post 412, Not Known 15 wrote:2-1days before deadline I vote someone and you comply.

...

VOTE: nk15