Mafiascum.net

In post 868, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 858, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I highly doubt S_S kill was scum motivated. We probably just have a bad vig or something. Because S_S wasn’t exactly prime townread material.

But. S_S townread Rat for saintass roleplay. Because they probably thought that Rat was tryna take a bullet for them

Maybe scum picked up on that

Seems a bit farfetched to me.

If i assume Bell is town that ends me up on Jackel98/Porkens/Starbuck as scum. But that seems almost too good to be true.
Maybe i should just sheep Joey on Porkens tho.

In post 838, Porkens wrote:I’m being set up.

Elaborate.

It does look like the path of least resistance. But you know, sometimes the lurkers be scum.

In post 838, Porkens wrote:Norwee, why were you softing saintass yesterday?

What do you think?

Porkens. You came in today with absolutely no reads or valuable comments and all you said is: "this is a setup guys! ;_;"
If you’re not scum, who is?

I really dislike vigs that shoot day 1 ugh

If they had shot Porkymunchkins i would have forgiven them.

In post 882, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If they had shot Porkymunchkins i would have forgiven them.

Porky/Jackel. How can you not shoot Porky/Jackel, honestly

Oh i’m used to it by now. It’s as natural as rain falling down from the sky that a D1 vig shot will always suck.

In post 880, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Porkens. You came in today with absolutely no reads or valuable comments and all you said is: "this is a setup guys! ;_;"
If you’re not scum, who is?

I mean they did drop this to be fair

In post 768, Porkens wrote:I apologize for my lack of engagement thus far. When I repped into the game things were just fine, but then my life quickly spun out of control. You can look at my recently completed games if you want to see a big part of it, but there were RL issues as well. My VLA was due to mental health and I needed to self-care ASAP. I had to disengage emotionally for a while because things were getting really dark. I'm in a better space now.

Joey

/Norwee/? Seems the likeliest team from my read through. They are very much acting in coordination. The third might be DD or even

Math

, which would explain the recent misdirection from

Joey

.

Jackel seems like flip bait to me.

Redtea,

SS

, Starbuck, catboi, Andro, and Rat/Bell all feel town to me.

I think banana is probably my strongest townread though.

VOTE: math

To be completely fair, if I was town Porky I'd feel set up as well

Well, we can always do Jackel98 if we get cold feet. The safest lynch of all.

I’m going to bed.
Happy scum hunting.

In post 887, Bell wrote:I’m going to bed.
Happy scum hunting.

Can't hunt scum if they are ASLEEPING

In post 888, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 887, Bell wrote:I’m going to bed.
Happy scum hunting.

Can't hunt scum if they are ASLEEPING

Et tu banana?

In post 889, Bell wrote:

In post 888, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 887, Bell wrote:I’m going to bed.
Happy scum hunting.

Can't hunt scum if they are ASLEEPING

Et tu banana?

>.>

<.<

Ummmm DAE mafia stump?!

Not impossible banana. You make perfect sense as a third-party stump to be honest. Don't think it's worth getting too into the possibility though.

In post 868, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 858, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I highly doubt S_S kill was scum motivated. We probably just have a bad vig or something. Because S_S wasn’t exactly prime townread material.

But. S_S townread Rat for saintass roleplay. Because they probably thought that Rat was tryna take a bullet for them

Maybe scum picked up on that

As 0% likely as this is, this post actually struck me as towny. What keeps it towny is that 0%.
Unless read from a maf-partners with Bell(form. Rat) point of view but I don't know that I'm ready to dive into that possibility.
So I at least neutral you. For now.
I'll also, for the record, despite me being the only person afaik who's delved into this section of conspiracy-land, say that I see this exchange as explicitly not s/s.

In post 850, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This Porkens wagon has way too much support already. We need a CW just in case this is wrong. Let’s not lynch too soon.
My current reads:

Catboi/Dumb & Dumber/Banana/Androgybee/Redtea likely town.
If i’m wrong on someone it’s probably either Androgybee or Redtea but i don’t think it’s likely.

I agree with what D/D said about Starbuck ISO.
Still not townreading Jackel like at all.
Porkens based on Joey’s points against them.
Bell

PoE pool is: Jackel98/Starbuck/Porkens/Bell
Less sure about Bell, but i haven’t really seen anything from them that makes me think: "this is town" yet. So not putting them out from my lynch candidates.

I agree in that I don't wanna ride this Porkens wagon with what we have, but this is an interesting, obv hard way of shifting discussion. There isn't any analysis of this push on Porkens. Not in a "maf saving his buddy" kind of way, but a "maf taking up the mantle of 'the sensible one'" since there's no way this wagon would carry through the whole day (and ofc rushing an elimination is always a risky tactic) so might as well jump the gun to score town points. Still carefully including Porkens in the PoE.
be an out-there move to save a buddy, but gut says otherwise. That and #693. That's legitimate hunting and acting with town. Though he never really branched out from there on that. The alternative imo is to push Porkens today, continue where Joey left off if Norwe was into his points (can't say I was) but, again, instead of analysis on Porkens or shit around them it's. It's this. Kinda weird.

Agree with him on Jackel/Bell/Starbuck being an eliminatable pool though and I don't know how to feel about that.

In post 795, Bell wrote:I would not share corruption values.

Why not?

Awww, it's ok Redtea, you can say you townread me.
You tsundere!

"Hmph, it's not like i townread you or anything. I just think some of your posts have been reasonable, you baka!"

nO

In post 886, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well, we can always do Jackel98 if we get cold feet. The safest lynch of all.

...
Establishing a "fall-back" this early in the day is setting up a rush-elimination later.
The beginning of a day is work. You gotta work for a buildup. Isn't it easier to just... rely completely on the gamestate of yesterday?
This is def maf behavior dudes.

In post 894, redtea wrote:The beginning of a day is work. You gotta work for a buildup. Isn't it easier to just... rely completely on the gamestate of yesterday?
This is def maf behavior dudes.

Are you saying Jackel has been looking better since yesterday? Because to me they just kinda look worse.

Like, you're giving me really strong "naive town" vibes Redtea. You come up with these explanations for why my actions are scum indicative. Sure they're not really convincing, but it seems like you believe what you're saying and that's already ten times better than whatever the fuck Jackel has been doing.

Also a Joey/me team is definitely off the table now.

Redtea, you've never read any of my previous games/played with me before right? Under any secret alts or whatever?

I feel so called out right now I can't even describe.
I don't even num read you but I hope you feel better knowing you only decently lean maf now.
I'd still eliminate you on a dime tho.

In post 895, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 894, redtea wrote:The beginning of a day is work. You gotta work for a buildup. Isn't it easier to just... rely completely on the gamestate of yesterday?
This is def maf behavior dudes.

Are you saying Jackel has been looking better since yesterday? Because to me they just kinda look worse.

No, it's about you locking her in as a fallback for elimination. I believe in a balance: keeping the previous day's play in mind as you start on solid land. People who deviate too much in either direction (relying on yesterday's plays <-> encouraging a fresh start).

Also shoutout to if you're reading this ty for explaining for me. I think I get it.