Mafiascum.net

In post 873, Fidget wrote:It's frustrating to me because I am not really confident in any of you being scum. It could be Nos sure. I don't see a good reason why but there isn't a lot for "why not?" either.

Plus gives us all that stuff which I just don't WANT to believe is scum. He could be town thinking that. Or he could be scum hiding behind "Ha I'm scummy on purpose".

And then there's you, which you haven't done anything seriously scummy either but out of the three you at least give off a sense of trying to help more than they do. Which ironically made me suspect you more. But I sort of buy that you were confirm biased by Titus' VCA. So.

You've got both "too scummy to be scum" and "too townie to be town" in there.

hmmm fidgety

In post 875, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 873, Fidget wrote:It's frustrating to me because I am not really confident in any of you being scum. It could be Nos sure. I don't see a good reason why but there isn't a lot for "why not?" either.

Plus gives us all that stuff which I just don't WANT to believe is scum. He could be town thinking that. Or he could be scum hiding behind "Ha I'm scummy on purpose".

And then there's you, which you haven't done anything seriously scummy either but out of the three you at least give off a sense of trying to help more than they do. Which ironically made me suspect you more. But I sort of buy that you were confirm biased by Titus' VCA. So.

You've got both "too scummy to be scum" and "too townie to be town" in there. :P

You're not 'too towny to be town', perhaps I should go into further detail.. I probably wouldn't even call you 'towny'.

I would say compared to Nos/Plus, your posts actually give off the feeling you're trying to help. However, a lot of your contributions are "This is good", being vague about what your stance is, and a lot of "X is town".

I'm not particularly moved into believing you are town, but you come off as someone who is actually trying. Which is what I mean by how you ironically seem a bit scummier than them for that alone. PlusJOY is actively trying to die and Nos has mostly not been present. You at least come off as present, and if you're town then you are helping.

So if I got a free shot inside the gladiate that doesn't affect the gamestate, I'd probably shoot Plus cause he's itching for it and he'll probably always be a jester, but if I actually had to guess who has the overall highest odds of being scum right here right now, it might be you instead. It's a bit too early for me to tell.

In post 866, DrippingGoofball wrote:What the pickle does that even mean? Let's parse. PlusJOY has an outrageous iso (that sounds like PJ is scum) but it's insulting to you, so how can it be from scum? What kind of word salad vomit is that? What a fancy way to say nothing and escape responsibility and scrutiny.

if u want to try ur absolute hardest to ignore the meaning of what im saying and instead try to create ur own that is entirely your prerogative

everyone else interpreted what i said as calling plusjoy too scummy to be scum but if you want to argue what i said is unclear feel free

i was simply unaware that i signed up for a blast to the past english class

I wish we could vote outside the gladiate. This gladiate is stalling out the game. It's making it more difficult to get townreads.

I am bored. With Shelly I thought I had scum to sell, and I was wrong. With these three I'm only voting because it's compulsory. I can't sell Plus as scum. Just vote and let's move on. We'll deal with the fallout. We don't even know how this mechanic exactly works yet.

In post 880, Titus wrote:I wish we could vote outside the gladiate. This gladiate is stalling out the game. It's making it more difficult to get townreads.

you dont think any of them are scum?

Do you still think fidget is scummy titus?

In post 882, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 880, Titus wrote:I wish we could vote outside the gladiate. This gladiate is stalling out the game. It's making it more difficult to get townreads.

you dont think any of them are scum?

I do think scum are infecting the Nos wagon. The catch is that I can't pressure anyone on it. Particularly Sausade.

I can't see townreads from people pushing new angles.

I think Plus is scum. That doesn't mean lockscum or that this trial is good.

In post 884, Vecna wrote:Do you still think fidget is scummy titus?

Punting on that question until he's able to be eliminated.

Joey, who would be the scum with nosferatu?

In post 861, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 836, Gypyx wrote:

In post 808, Nosferatu wrote:isn't it crazy that 3 ppl on my wagon have been scumreading me since d1 but can't provide even an iota of a case

Dunno about you but i find it hard to scumcase

an iso empty of readable content

That's what I call a scumcase.

In post 865, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 838, Nosferatu wrote:just keep doing what u do best, the absolute bare minimum while acting like uve got a prolific body of content urself

at the very least ive never actively lurked and proceeded to throw potshots at slots with half my post count

I just iso'd Gypyx, and your accusation is gratuitous and perhaps vindictive.

Gypyx is an active participant, provides actual content, and is town.

It's bizarre that this is the player you are choosing to pick on.

Damn dgb, am I scum or town?

In post 746, Gypyx wrote:

@Joey

why did you want to get lynched last Day and why don't you still want to get lynched today?

I still want this post answered

In post 858, Marashu wrote:@Eddie what are you trying to accomplish?

I have a plan that I wish to not reveal yet. However, if you had a shot, who would you shoot?

titus what is your best argument for why plus is scum?

In post 889, Gypyx wrote:

In post 746, Gypyx wrote:

@Joey

why did you want to get lynched last Day and why don't you still want to get lynched today?

I still want this post answered

who is joey?

Oh uh it's you

Akward...

Yeah by the way i often mix up letters / words when reading, don't worry about correcting me if i mix up names

is that me?
Well if it is I kinda just absentmindedly lolhammered shelly, thinking trials might be fun since I was having trouble sorting people and keeping up. Then afterwards I thought I'd at least try to get the scum in the gladiate so I don't just throw. I'm still happy to go if you want me to however

and I also thought that hey, there is a chance of shelly being scum why not

IM SORRY BUT @DGB WHERE IS THE CONTENT

In post 888, Gypyx wrote:

In post 861, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 836, Gypyx wrote:

In post 808, Nosferatu wrote:isn't it crazy that 3 ppl on my wagon have been scumreading me since d1 but can't provide even an iota of a case

Dunno about you but i find it hard to scumcase

an iso empty of readable content

That's what I call a scumcase.

In post 865, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 838, Nosferatu wrote:just keep doing what u do best, the absolute bare minimum while acting like uve got a prolific body of content urself

at the very least ive never actively lurked and proceeded to throw potshots at slots with half my post count

I just iso'd Gypyx, and your accusation is gratuitous and perhaps vindictive.

Gypyx is an active participant, provides actual content, and is town.

It's bizarre that this is the player you are choosing to pick on.

Damn dgb, am I scum or town?

In the first quote I agree with you saying that Nos' iso by itself is a scum case, maybe that's what you misinterpreted?

First one I agree with you, second one I call you town.

My bad, I misinterpeted the meaning of scumcase in your post for some reason, i thought you were calling my case a case made by scum