Mafiascum.net

In post 871, Nono wrote:I wanna put in faiths maths is smart because you have to be smart to do maths,, so scum is a compliment kek xD
just don’t underestimate,, cockiness is bad, y’all

With a role like mine I anticipate dying quickly.

If it’s by elimination town wins by seeing who pushes me and why
And if it’s by night death town wins because reasons

So it’s win win.

Keep going. Why am I scum to you?

In post 873, Nono wrote:what’s the case

Sam was the one who asked about pages.

Then later she posts her own.

This means she’d be prepared for the eventuality that she would have to share what page. It’s not a “rapid fire” mistake. She planned to respond with only page 63. It makes it very unlikely to be a mistake.

why’s a page link scum? I don’t get it,, who else gets this case, if the majority does,, I’m dumb, I’ll reread and think, but there’s no connection, what

“Nono’s inactivity is a nono” it’s no. no.

It’s that she linked to the wrong page.

If I am town going to make my entire play in a bastard game mind you about mechanics, I would double check to make sure stuff works correctly before posting. She didn’t. Then her claim doesn’t really sync up with mechanics either. Compulsive and random. That’s the person who should be not focusing on mechanics. There’s a mindset that doesn’t make sense.

Yeah theres a strong case on Sam, that's certainly true.

In post 443, Nono wrote:

In post 433, TemporalLich wrote:yeah you'll have to trust albert on that one but 185 is meant to back up his role claim.

I’m mod confirmed too,, just trust xD

In post 442, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're just gonna take him at his word that he cant die?

I rather make sure.

what’s the plan?

“Doubting,” i get it,, the theory is you fake claim a n0 investigative, pick a random target thinking “chances are, this is town because I am scum heehee xD” but then got caught, ok,, now why fake claim investigative when you’re vig because you’re more likely to die,, doesn’t make sense!

everyone is scummy kek

rampage,, here is the question

why don’t you like berty, was cute

My plan was to loverize him

In post 849, MathBlade wrote:The post was preplanned

What makes you think that; how does it work?

In post 865, TemporalLich wrote:The best way I can describe DGB's ISO is with my small atom of experience DGB's ISO feels like it isn't at all playing to DGB's meta... yet I know nothing about DGB's meta

meta is trash

that's all you ever need to know about anyone's meta

all your answers are in the game

In post 72, samantha97 wrote:should we share which page(s) we sent for roles?

This was her very first post. Most people on entry do a joke or bait a reaction or vote someone.

Her entry disregards that and immediately focuses on mechanics. It doesn’t give anything and lets her sit back.

She gave little/no reads depending upon interpretation and spent a lot of time compiling the who posted what numbers list. She’s been laser focused on the mechanics to the exclusion of much all else that is a mark of devotion. It means she’s more focused on mechanics than poking about reads. Becomes iioa.

In post 876, MathBlade wrote:

In post 873, Nono wrote:what’s the case

Sam was the one who asked about pages.

Then later she posts her own.

This means she’d be prepared for the eventuality that she would have to share what page. It’s not a “rapid fire” mistake. She planned to respond with only page 63. It makes it very unlikely to be a mistake.

Not a simple cut and paste error?

In post 886, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 876, MathBlade wrote:

In post 873, Nono wrote:what’s the case

Sam was the one who asked about pages.

Then later she posts her own.

This means she’d be prepared for the eventuality that she would have to share what page. It’s not a “rapid fire” mistake. She planned to respond with only page 63. It makes it very unlikely to be a mistake.

Not a simple cut and paste error?

She said she hand built the url that lead to the page. So it’s either A> She didn’t double check her work despite laser focus on mechanics and not knowing how the page system works despite wanting everyone’s pages
Or B> She is scum.

The simpler solution is that she is scum and she either intended to post that page or didn’t expect anyone to look too deeply.

In post 885, MathBlade wrote:

In post 72, samantha97 wrote:should we share which page(s) we sent for roles?

This was her very first post. Most people on entry do a joke or bait a reaction or vote someone.

Her entry disregards that and immediately focuses on mechanics. It doesn’t give anything and lets her sit back.

She gave little/no reads depending upon interpretation and spent a lot of time compiling the who posted what numbers list. She’s been laser focused on the mechanics to the exclusion of much all else that is a mark of devotion. It means she’s more focused on mechanics than poking about reads. Becomes iioa.

OH NO SOMEONE IS TRYING TO ADVANCE THE GAME INSTEAD OF DOING RVS. WAHHHH.

math wagon anyone? or we've already been down this road and math softed some PR that i still dont get.

In post 888, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 885, MathBlade wrote:

In post 72, samantha97 wrote:should we share which page(s) we sent for roles?

This was her very first post. Most people on entry do a joke or bait a reaction or vote someone.

Her entry disregards that and immediately focuses on mechanics. It doesn’t give anything and lets her sit back.

She gave little/no reads depending upon interpretation and spent a lot of time compiling the who posted what numbers list. She’s been laser focused on the mechanics to the exclusion of much all else that is a mark of devotion. It means she’s more focused on mechanics than poking about reads. Becomes iioa.

OH NO SOMEONE IS TRYING TO ADVANCE THE GAME INSTEAD OF DOING RVS. WAHHHH.

math wagon anyone? or we've already been down this road and math softed some PR that i still dont get.

That actually doesn’t advance the game. It’s numbers. If I made up numbers of pages it doesn’t tell you anything about me. Those pages could just be omitted from the setup. It’s a post designed to look helpful but isn’t.

I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.

In post 890, MathBlade wrote:I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.

what character?

In post 891, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 890, MathBlade wrote:I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.

what character?

Out of character is a phrase. It means unexpected for the person.

I haven’t seen you with that kind of sarcasm/extremeness. It’s very off putting and odd.

In post 892, MathBlade wrote:

In post 891, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 890, MathBlade wrote:I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.

what character?

Out of character is a phrase. It means unexpected for the person.

I haven’t seen you with that kind of sarcasm/extremeness. It’s very off putting and odd.

but youve only seen me play as scum lol

In post 893, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 892, MathBlade wrote:

In post 891, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 890, MathBlade wrote:I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.

what character?

Out of character is a phrase. It means unexpected for the person.

I haven’t seen you with that kind of sarcasm/extremeness. It’s very off putting and odd.

but youve only seen me play as scum lol

Yes this is true, but in general people have a range. When a person deviates there’s a trigger point. I’ve been saying Sam is scum for a while now. Other players have agreed with the theory mentioned before. Yet here you make an extreme reaction. It’s not natural. It’s artificial.

So what made you cry WAHhhhhhh?

In post 882, Albert B. Rampage wrote:My plan was to loverize him

silly,, that's not an answer, why loverize him
"what's the plan"?
can't get more clearer than that,, don't dodge, can't dodge

you can dodge berty question, not dodging would make me happy kek

maths pushing me feels,, like
sometimes sees me here and feels bad,, when i'm gone, wants to push cuz i'm lhf and delicious bait xD

i don't get the case xD logic is dead in this game,, ain't for me

In post 897, Nono wrote:maths pushing me feels,, like
sometimes sees me here and feels bad,, when i'm gone, wants to push cuz i'm lhf and delicious bait xD

i don't get the case xD logic is dead in this game,, ain't for me

Why do people make the stupid argument I push low hanging fruit?

I as scum have had some of the best games on site. If I want to I could make anyone scum. Iirc I have made conf town scum. These are things I do. If you don’t believe me ABR can testify to Shadowrun where almost every bit was orchestrated. Won a 2xa billion (hyperbole).

Do yourself a favor and if you think I am scum (and you’re town) bring your a game. Then you can obvtown while being wrong.

The more people who push me the more people ABR gets for his group theory anyway.

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=67961

There’s the game if you care. Please stop with the “low hanging fruit”. I have more examples than I know what to do with. Seriously. Gistou.

I can scum. I am getting better at being town, but I surely can scum.