Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 6:24 pm
After rereading IVD, maybe I was being unfair at a couple points. I can't say I town read him exactly, but I'll give him breathing room and keep evaluating there
UNVOTE:
UNVOTE:
What about his meta makes you think he’s is town precisely? I’m looking at a few games of his and I don’t see this overtly matching his town meta.In post 879, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:ok like the more i read the more i see the town meta VP- when i was scum i kinda ignored it and didnt realize it and when he was scum it was obvious to me, i think this is the first time we might have rolled town together?? Feels different here now
I think he is scum thoIn post 884, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:ok i got to drunk and distracted - but pls dont vote VP i dont think htats scum
pls trust the drunk koba i think vp townIn post 885, RLotus wrote:I think he is scum thoIn post 884, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:ok i got to drunk and distracted - but pls dont vote VP i dont think htats scum
a) they themIn post 881, Battle Mage wrote:i return this morning
and what do i see?
reformed toxic player
still dodging me
will he respond?
or keep hiding away?
I'm currently happy
to elim him today
its like - when i was town aginst scum him i could feel it. when i was scum against town him i was like - scared. but also easily able to let him get framed. i could just ignore him.In post 882, RLotus wrote:What about his meta makes you think he’s is town precisely? I’m looking at a few games of his and I don’t see this overtly matching his town meta.In post 879, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:ok like the more i read the more i see the town meta VP- when i was scum i kinda ignored it and didnt realize it and when he was scum it was obvious to me, i think this is the first time we might have rolled town together?? Feels different here now
So you think his play is scary reminiscent of how you saw him as town before? Or you just don't feel it like when he was scum?In post 888, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:its like - when i was town aginst scum him i could feel it. when i was scum against town him i was like - scared. but also easily able to let him get framed. i could just ignore him.In post 882, RLotus wrote:What about his meta makes you think he’s is town precisely? I’m looking at a few games of his and I don’t see this overtly matching his town meta.In post 879, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:ok like the more i read the more i see the town meta VP- when i was scum i kinda ignored it and didnt realize it and when he was scum it was obvious to me, i think this is the first time we might have rolled town together?? Feels different here now
and i did cuz i felt i could just slide by him with how i plyed.
In post 839, VP Baltar wrote:I am indeed looking for an elim. That's actually how this game is played. If you think I'm being inconsistent or opportunistic, which seems to be what you're saying, then please explain how that fits with me solo pushing a Dunn wagon for a good chunk of this game?In post 838, RLotus wrote:Well I based that on the way he was entertaining BM when BM was talking about me and him jumping on RTP just now. I think I recall him throwing out other names, like maybe looking for an elimIn post 837, RLotus wrote:Honestly I'm not feeling good about VP Baltar. It seems he is willing to jump onto any scumread thrown out there.
And yeah, I townread BM. I'm willing to support him.
Why do you think I'm opportunistic and not Datisi? Because I said your read on the game is one dimensional?
In post 895, DkKoba wrote:im just seeing more scumminess from BM for the leading vote and i think datisi/vp had bad reads sory..........
So why doesnt BM have a bad read?In post 896, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:In post 895, DkKoba wrote:im just seeing more scumminess from BM for the leading vote and i think datisi/vp had bad reads sory..........
i bcan prob explain when sob er bnut i feel BM is like agneda vobting and the ohter 2 are like genuine votes based on their meta on me etc.... like it makes sense ofr htem while it doesnt for bm does that make sense??In post 897, RLotus wrote:So why doesnt BM have a bad read?In post 896, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:In post 895, DkKoba wrote:im just seeing more scumminess from BM for the leading vote and i think datisi/vp had bad reads sory..........
lol im dumb as fuck i camnt post omn the right accountIn post 898, DkKoba wrote:i bcan prob explain when sob er bnut i feel BM is like agneda vobting and the ohter 2 are like genuine votes based on their meta on me etc.... like it makes sense ofr htem while it doesnt for bm does that make sense??In post 897, RLotus wrote:So why doesnt BM have a bad read?In post 896, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:In post 895, DkKoba wrote:im just seeing more scumminess from BM for the leading vote and i think datisi/vp had bad reads sory..........