Mafiascum.net

In post 872, SirCakez wrote:I'm not nervous your logic is terrible if it's what I think you're implying.
Why would I be coaching Math in thread if we were buddies?

Refuge in Bad Play

I'm not that bad

We shall see :3

In post 789, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:For real though I'm just trying to get a feel for why people think Titus is scummier than Math cause I wanna kill both but I picked Math and now people are swaying the other way.

So I have concerns I am 50/50 and scum pushing me the other way, so if you can help me with why Titus over Math more scummy or why Math townie depending on your opinion would be helpful

'kay

Titus' posts read like polished turds, very nice, and reasonable, and sensible.

In post 271, Titus wrote:

In post 110, MathBlade wrote:I think Spiffeh town BM scum Prism null LLD scum lean Cakez is prob town but scum in a very minor circumstance so not considering it. If I am right then Titus is town by proxy.

This sounds like gibberish.

And Titus is correct, that does sound like total gibberish! Hence why Math is town.

Also FFS she's half buying your obvious bs mason claim. Bad scum reaction to buddy? Bad scum reaction to townie? Dunno, I like the common denominator.

In post 876, SirCakez wrote:I'm not that bad

In fairness to Pooky, well, I've played with you before. He kinda got a point.

Like honestly the least believable part of that hypothesis

Is Cakez coaching Mathblade. And not, like, visa versa.

In post 860, Spiffeh wrote:Anyway, I feel like I've posted enough today and want to respect the deadline/page count so I'm forcing myself to stay away til tomorrow. I'm extremely curious as to what Tammy thinks of Dunnstral and GreyICE and her general thoughts on the game. I think she said she'd be back tonight so hopefully I'll have some phenomenal Tammy content upon my return.

Yeah, sorry you're going to be disappointed. I'm sorta kinda keeping up right now, but midterm grades are due and I'm behind and have literally done nothing except grade and go to meetings the past couple days. My brain is mush and I have no patience or brain power for mafia. BUT my plan is to do something tomorrow while my car is getting serviced before grading and meetings begin, so I'm not a total burnout. (I'm not sure how great my thoughts are going to be because most everything I've read while also trying to grade has gotten a shrug don't care about most of what has been posted, maybe I'll feel differently tomorrow though!)

Also Nachgres - I'll respond to the question you asked me about Titus tomorrow then too!

GreyICE is town.

For proof of this see Boonskiies where I was coaching (a little) Cakez. His scum game is getting a lot better than people give credit for.

I am good/great scum. Working on my town game.

Also sangres regarding post count it’s literally damned if I do damned if I don’t.

*goes back to lurking*

In post 882, MathBlade wrote:GreyICE is town.

For proof of this see Boonskiies where I was coaching (a little) Cakez. His scum game is getting a lot better than people give credit for.

i don't see how these two relate to each other

Mastina! (with bonus offer of lynching her... so tempting)
Tammy!
Kitty Trauma Team! (With bonus for there's two of them)

guyz I have a free money bet
not three green

I wonder how many townies we can trick Mathscum into spewing for us

In post 880, GreyICE wrote:Like honestly the least believable part of that hypothesis

Is Cakez coaching Mathblade. And not, like, visa versa.

GreyICE is saying if I am scum I would be coaching MathBlade.

He’s putting logical stuff out there that makes sense therefore he’s probably town.

When I understand him and he explains he’s town

When he’s argumentative and demanding and “spicy” he’s scum.

So he’s town.

I would be coaching Cakez lol*

i have a sample size of 1 w/ GreyICE but that was not my experience w/ town GreyICE at all. Can't comment on his scumgame.

Either way that seems like a criminally low bar to set

So? It works? I haven’t played a completed game with him in a year+ though so grain of salt I guess. That’s been my experience though. *shrug*

I don’t care if it’s a low bar or “weird” if someone does something as town and not as scum or vice versa that forms my reads until otherwise.

In post 879, GreyICE wrote:

In post 876, SirCakez wrote:I'm not that bad

In fairness to Pooky, well, I've played with you before. He kinda got a point.

?????????
I don't even remember what you're referring to

We kinda all coached each other in BooneyToonz lol

This is such a dumb argument anyways
Literally nowhere on site does coaching in the main game thread still happen

In post 873, borkjerfkin wrote:

In post 868, Dunnstral wrote:It's their justification for voting me

what does it mean then?

Ask math, not me.

But it looks like they are saying that I was saying they were having a meltdown, which is not true. That could also be directed as jsut SirCakez so I'm not really sure.

In post 888, borkjerfkin wrote:Either way that seems like a criminally low bar to set

This has been my argument for other people this game, but sangres/pooky and others are being SO defensive about it, like how dare I question their godreads

In post 874, SirCakez wrote:Dunnstral is all like "better not let this easy miselim slip out of our hands"

This does not sound like my scum play, or what you've seen of my scum play. It's also very weak.

You just saw me in Popcorn Mafia

In post 870, borkjerfkin wrote:on the other hand there's been like a metric fuckton of conversation about mathblade, and you've come out on the side of "this is a concerted effort to protect a buddy" vs "some other people are seeing something different than me" and it's odd that you're just not considering the latter

I was considering the latter.

But then Math made scummy posts
And the people voting me made scummy posts

In post 892, SirCakez wrote:This is such a dumb argument anyways
Literally nowhere on site does coaching in the main game thread still happen

are you more insulted by GI's lack of belief in your scum skills

or my belief that you'd actually openly coach a buddy in the thread

or MB's belief that it should be him coaching you and not the other way around?

:3

there's only one correct answer that Town!Cakez would make

Afternoon Vote Count 1.04

Afternoon 1 will end in (expired on 2021-03-01 23:59:59)

With 17 players alive, it takes 9 votes bronze.

Dunnstral (4): , SirCakez, quiet, Battle Mage, Spiffeh
MathBlade (5): Bell, Lady Lambdadelta, PookyTheMagicalBear, Titus, Dunnstral
PookyTheMagicalBear(1): MathBlade
Titus (2): GreyICE, sangres

Not voting (5): Tammy, borkjerfkin, Kitty Trauma Team, mastina, Prism


Mod notes: 35/85 pages used

In post 893, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 873, borkjerfkin wrote:

In post 868, Dunnstral wrote:It's their justification for voting me

what does it mean then?

Ask math, not me.

But it looks like they are saying that I was saying they were having a meltdown, which is not true. That could also be directed as jsut SirCakez so I'm not really sure.

In post 888, borkjerfkin wrote:Either way that seems like a criminally low bar to set

This has been my argument for other people this game, but sangres/pooky and others are being SO defensive about it, like how dare I question their godreads

My argument was a lot of players in the game had shaded and/or voted for me at that point. SirCakez being hyperbolic (?) said I was having a meltdown over like one vote. Which had no context of the rest of players shade.

In post 550, MathBlade wrote:

In post 548, Titus wrote:

In post 537, MathBlade wrote:Why would scum want me a let’s be generous and say below average player like me dead?

Free miselimination is a free miselimination

That’s what I said. That’s why towards the end (Eg Dunn and Cakez although not voting saying meltdown) are more likely scum than not mason LLD and Prism.

So why is my name here