Mafiascum.net

VOTE: T3

Thoughts on yesterday's wagon being an attempt to save T3?

In post 874, Roden wrote:

In post 565, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I am a mason vig with ranny, and I will 100% shoot him if you self-vote here.

Currently reading through ISOs. Was there any truth to this?

That has a truth score of about 7%

In post 876, Titus wrote:VOTE: T3

Thoughts on yesterday's wagon being an attempt to save T3?

Well, pretty much all the people on Roden's wagon jamped onto KidAnn. Do you think any of them is likely to be scum, Titus?

In post 709, Umlaut wrote:

Vote Count 2.2

Federal Art Project poster promoting milk drinking in Cleveland, 1940.

T3

(3): Titus, Jake the Wolfie, KidAmn

Roden

(2): Egix96, VFP

KidAmn

(1): Rannygazoo

geraintm

(1): Roden

Not voting

(4): DrippingGoofball, T3, cw357, geraintm

With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to yeet.

Deadline:

(expired on 2021-06-26 01:04:00)

In post 775, Umlaut wrote:

Vote Count 2.4

Century Building in Melbourne (1939).

T3

(3): Titus, Jake the Wolfie, KidAmn

Roden

(3): Egix96, VFP, DrippingGoofball

KidAmn

(3): Rannygazoo, Roden, T3

Not voting

(2): cw357, geraintm

With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to yeet.

Deadline:

(expired on 2021-06-26 01:04:00)

Notes:

• Seeking a replacement for cw357.

In post 811, Umlaut wrote:

Vote Count 2.5 (final)

'Lady with Panther' display card by George Barbier for Cartier, 1914.

KidAmn

(6): Rannygazoo, Roden, T3, Egix96, VFP, DrippingGoofball

T3

(3): Titus, Jake the Wolfie, KidAmn

Not voting

(2): cw357, geraintm

With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to yeet.

Notes:

• Seeking a replacement for cw357.

If T3 is scum, I would expect at least one of Egix, VFP, and DGB to be scum. Maybe all 3 but that's moonlogic and unlikely.

In post 874, Roden wrote:

In post 565, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I am a mason vig with ranny, and I will 100% shoot him if you self-vote here.

Currently reading through ISOs. Was there any truth to this?

I disavow. Compare with:

In post 422, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

In post 401, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 398, Jake The Wolfie wrote:How would a Doctor be helpful if T3 is town?

Cw can heal T3 and vig can shoot T3 to verify town alignment

Of course, T3 just dies if cw is lying or is roleblocked

There’s your daily does of IIOA

And why would we assume there is a vigilante?
This is just filled with holes.

Calling a short post "full of holes" (which describes someone after a vig gets to them) made it look like Jake was trying to get me to notice that he was softing vig.

I read that very different.

In post 879, Titus wrote:If T3 is scum, I would expect at least one of Egix, VFP, and DGB to be scum. Maybe all 3 but that's moonlogic and unlikely.

I like this solve and I'm willing to commit to yeeting T3 today, but there are some loose ends we should tie up before we move on. Particularly, Jake's mysterious FoS in 787, and DGB's quick hammer.

In post 881, VFP wrote:I read that very different.

What was your interpretation?

In post 883, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 881, VFP wrote:I read that very different.

What was your interpretation?

The plan was just bad and basically confirmed cw when a vig wasn't known, and even now no sign of a vig.
The response just seems to be Jake disagree that it works imo.

The wording of Jake shows the opposit of hinting to vig and basically confirming he's not a vig. Otherwise there's not holes in the plan, and he can just ask why could there be a vig.

So T3 is active atm. I'll give until the morning otherwise I'm voting there.
We're in an important stage and there's obviously no cop claims so T3 is lying.

In post 877, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

In post 874, Roden wrote:

In post 565, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I am a mason vig with ranny, and I will 100% shoot him if you self-vote here.

Currently reading through ISOs. Was there any truth to this?

That has a truth score of about 7%

So something here is correct...? If you're a Mason, we have two clears. I promise you my role will narrow down the scum pool further, but I need to make sure nobody's claims contradict mine.

To me, the wording reads like he doesn’t want the vig to be outed.

If that’s your interpretation, that explains why Jake wasn’t the kill on night 1.

In post 886, Roden wrote:

In post 877, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

In post 874, Roden wrote:

In post 565, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I am a mason vig with ranny, and I will 100% shoot him if you self-vote here.

Currently reading through ISOs. Was there any truth to this?

That has a truth score of about 7%

So something here is correct...? If you're a Mason, we have two clears. I promise you my role will narrow down the scum pool further, but I need to make sure nobody's claims contradict mine.

This is a little weird. Scum is motivated to wait and see what the claims are so they can make up something that fits they way they need it to. What’s the town motivation for waiting for others to claim?

In post 783, KidAmn wrote:I'm nothing special, apart from the fact I'm a neighbour with someone who should know better.

Does anyone else think this implies his neighbor was somebody who voted for him? Because in that case, I'm not a Neighborizer, T3 can't be one, and Ranny has already implied he isn't one. Which would leave Egix and VFP, who both voted right before KA made this cryptic post.

In post 888, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 886, Roden wrote:

In post 877, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

In post 874, Roden wrote:

In post 565, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I am a mason vig with ranny, and I will 100% shoot him if you self-vote here.

Currently reading through ISOs. Was there any truth to this?

That has a truth score of about 7%

So something here is correct...? If you're a Mason, we have two clears. I promise you my role will narrow down the scum pool further, but I need to make sure nobody's claims contradict mine.

This is a little weird. Scum is motivated to wait and see what the claims are so they can make up something that fits they way they need it to. What’s the town motivation for waiting for others to claim?

I understand, but that's exactly why I'm waiting. I know I'm town but I don't know Jake's alignment. If he claims Masons with someone I know can't be a Mason, that doesn't look good for him.

I know I played badly on Day 2 and that people have a good reason to scum read me. I understand if people don't trust me.

It's also why I wanted to wait for the 2 shot Cop. I was hoping to possibly catch them in a lie if scum claimed it.

If there’s a town neighborizer, they definitely would have neighborized someone night 2. Unless it’s odd nights only or something, but if their power is gated, I don’t know why they would neighborize KA and then waste him.

CW’s slot was the obvious kill, so I’m not going to buy it if someone claims that they neighborized there on night 2.

Hey, I just remembered something.

In post 631, Egix96 wrote:

In post 627, geraintm wrote:not much to say until everyone of interest says what happened....

We probably shouldn't yeet KA. That's my nugget of wisdom for today.

Why this and then the reversal at the end of day 2 without even a comment?

Egix, something you’re not telling us?

In post 882, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 879, Titus wrote:If T3 is scum, I would expect at least one of Egix, VFP, and DGB to be scum. Maybe all 3 but that's moonlogic and unlikely.

I like this solve and I'm willing to commit to yeeting T3 today, but there are some loose ends we should tie up before we move on. Particularly, Jake's mysterious FoS in 787, and DGB's quick hammer.

I don't recall care to push on Jake's 787. It might be ongoing games. It might be role related. When someone says they can't talk about it, I take them at their word.

Second, I don't see what else DGB can say beyond accident.

In post 811, Umlaut wrote:

Vote Count 2.5 (final)

'Lady with Panther' display card by George Barbier for Cartier, 1914.

KidAmn

(6): Rannygazoo, Roden, T3, Egix96, VFP, DrippingGoofball

T3

(3): Titus, Jake the Wolfie, KidAmn

Not voting

(2): cw357, geraintm

With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to yeet.

Notes:

• Seeking a replacement for cw357.

Ohhh....
VOTE: egix
Scum neighborizer?

T3 can you tell us why the 2 shot Cop doesn't actually exist?

In post 897, Roden wrote:T3 can you tell us why the 2 shot Cop doesn't actually exist?

Well
.
.
.

That didn't work.

VOTE: T3

I do not like this slot.