Mafiascum.net

In post 870, Roden wrote:

In post 845, Infinity 324 wrote:skitter is scummmm

Do you town read Gamma? Or Kyouko? You just got accused of being scum but you've got nothing to say about that? This half-hearted re-attempt to call Skitter scum without actually casing her reads like you're trying to steer the wagon off of Gamma by memeing.

i'm not memeing

i have expressed my townreads on gamma and kyokou a couple times now

skitt accused me of being scum but we've hashed that out to death

i have a strong gut feeling that skitter is scum and i think we should eliminate her

hehe

Wait oh

is it problematic for you that one townread of your is scumreading another towneread of yours on the basis that they're partners with you
and once again i think your scumread on me is baseless

@infinity

pedit so close!

Oh you're so dead

also again

In post 874, rousseau wrote:

In post 871, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m a thoughtful person by nature. So it seems like you have a problem with my playstyle at this point rousseau.

when i note something it doesn't mean

THIS IS BAD EVIL

unless it is accompanied by me saying

THIS IS BAD EVIL

The way you’re talking about it feels like you are though
You’re like “this is weird” in a way that sounds like you’re concerned about it
That feels like you think it’s a scum-weird

In post 878, skitter30 wrote:is it problematic for you that one townread of your is scumreading another towneread of yours on the basis that they're partners with you

well it's annoying, but it doesn't really mean anything about their alignments? pretty sure kyokou is just wrong

i mean my issue is more that you basically had no reaction to that wall where townread A is calling townread B scum with you

In post 882, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 878, skitter30 wrote:is it problematic for you that one townread of your is scumreading another towneread of yours on the basis that they're partners with you

well it's annoying, but it doesn't really mean anything about their alignments? pretty sure kyokou is just wrong

What do you think of skitter’s take on the case

i can't explain my gamma read in a way that will be convincing to anyone at the moment, so there was no productive way for me to respond to that post

In post 884, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 882, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 878, skitter30 wrote:is it problematic for you that one townread of your is scumreading another towneread of yours on the basis that they're partners with you

well it's annoying, but it doesn't really mean anything about their alignments? pretty sure kyokou is just wrong

What do you think of skitter’s take on the case

i actually agree with it, but the way skitter expressed her thoughts on it felt scummy to me for some reason.

this thread is getting too serious for an old troll like me

infy lemme know if you figure out who the baddies are

i figured out one of them (skitter)

In post 886, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 884, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 882, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 878, skitter30 wrote:is it problematic for you that one townread of your is scumreading another towneread of yours on the basis that they're partners with you

well it's annoying, but it doesn't really mean anything about their alignments? pretty sure kyokou is just wrong

What do you think of skitter’s take on the case

i actually agree with it, but the way skitter expressed her thoughts on it felt scummy to me for some reason.

Logic tells me it’s pretty much neutral
My emotions tell me to trust skitter

In post 875, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 870, Roden wrote:

In post 845, Infinity 324 wrote:skitter is scummmm

Do you town read Gamma? Or Kyouko? You just got accused of being scum but you've got nothing to say about that? This half-hearted re-attempt to call Skitter scum without actually casing her reads like you're trying to steer the wagon off of Gamma by memeing.

i'm not memeing

i have expressed my townreads on gamma and kyokou a couple times now

skitt accused me of being scum but we've hashed that out to death

i have a strong gut feeling that skitter is scum and i think we should eliminate her

You're gonna have to give me a reason why Skitter is scum because I left that wagon awhile ago now.

If you think Kyouko is just wrong then you need to explain why. I'm not asking for a wall of text, but what she said made logical sense and your response just makes you look like you're trying to be dismissive while trying to wagon somebody else. Like, your response is essentially just "you're wrong, we're not suspicious, this other person is instead" while giving zero reasoning for any of it.

VOTE: Infinity

I think this slot has a higher chance of flipping red than Gamma. It's possible Infinity is trying to build false associatives, and it feels like she could just be white knighting Gamma.

In post 881, Gamma Emerald wrote:The way you’re talking about it feels like you are though
You’re like “this is weird” in a way that sounds like you’re concerned about it
That feels like you think it’s a scum-weird

i mean there are a lot of reasons i note things but if they are accompanied by text that is usually the reasoning

like in this case i just thought 'oh just like earlier when responding to tetrina's questions!'

and like, it is still noteworthy to me because it is very different to expectation, and apparently stands out to pooky as well, consistent with earlier, so i should go back and check on the explanation, and maybe further context would also be helpful to pooky for considering

like maybe it's scum-weird yeah but it's also possibly just how you approach similar things as it was consistent with earlier,

if i thought 'this is scum-weird' immediately upon reading it i probably would have said

'this is scummy'

instead

In post 891, Roden wrote:VOTE: Infinity

I think this slot has a higher chance of flipping red than Gamma. It's possible Infinity is trying to build false associatives, and it feels like she could just be white knighting Gamma.

I think if it were a WK she'd have an actual reason to tr him.

In post 812, Tetrina wrote:

In post 478, Tetrina wrote:

Morning Tweet: Are the callers talking to each other?

MT ignored me

??

In post 893, Galron wrote:

In post 891, Roden wrote:VOTE: Infinity

I think this slot has a higher chance of flipping red than Gamma. It's possible Infinity is trying to build false associatives, and it feels like she could just be white knighting Gamma.

I think if it were a WK she'd have an actual reason to tr him.

That's the issue. She doesn't have a reason to TR him. So why is she? Unless she's about to claim N0 Cop check or Masons, I don't see how she could be confidently town reading him with zero explanation.

In post 883, skitter30 wrote:i mean my issue is more that you basically had no reaction to that wall where townread A is calling townread B scum with you

What reaction was she supposed to have?

i have a lot of experience with gamma, and i think the way he's letting his observations flow instead of feeling forced is very towny for him.

i didn't give my reasoning since i didn't think it'd be convincing/useful to anyone else.

In post 891, Roden wrote:it feels like she could just be white knighting Gamma.

How do you differentiate white knighting from an honest town read?

In post 896, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 883, skitter30 wrote:i mean my issue is more that you basically had no reaction to that wall where townread A is calling townread B scum with you

What reaction was she supposed to have?

i mean if i saw townread A calling townread B scum with me i would probably have some sort of response, probably along the lines of explaining why B is town and/or explaining why i'm town

i wouldn't just like ignore that altogether