Mafiascum.net

In post 8945, Untrod Tripod wrote:you can just say you think I'm a bad player and you're a good player and save the time

i don't think that

i think you missed some of the more important parts of the game up to this point and your contributions haven't been useful because there's been too much going on

i think you're probably significantly more useful when we get to a later stage with fewer players, because from my limited impressions of you it seems you get locked on a small group of players and i think once we've whittled down the player list it will be good again

I had a sneaking suspicion

like forcing manipulative stances at the expense of trying to work out people's intent and shit is clearly scum motivated

In post 8949, Untrod Tripod wrote:I will say this though, this is the conversation:

"hey everyone, what you're doing is wrong. everyone should do what I say"
"yo, you're not in charge"
"no one cares about your opinions and moreover no one even wants to hear them"
"here's two people who are openly sheeping me"
"those people are bad. no one who matters cares about your opinions and people who do matter care about my opinions"

you took this to a weird and personal place and I'm not really sure why.

Wooper wrote:someone save me the legwork has UT said anything non manipulative this game

...you know we're playing mafia, right?

more like
"hey everyone what you're doing is wrong, stop doing it"
"yo, you're not in charge"
"i don't think you've been paying attention to what i've been doing or what's been going on, so your opinion's pretty irrelevant"
"here's two people that are openly sheeping me"
"ok one of those people is also questionably aware and the otherlooks like they just don't have any reads of their own so they're sheeping a town read of theirs"

In post 8951, Wooper wrote:I had a sneaking suspicion

like forcing manipulative stances at the expense of trying to work out people's intent and shit is clearly scum motivated

expand on this

so i think in general players like to feel important
i think UT hasn't particularly felt this way ( a lot of players have, this game is very very big)
and i think that leads UT to be argumentative, in attempts to feel like they matter.

jhust a theory tho

......

and UT responded to this by asking you to tell him he's a bad player?

In post 8954, Miss Lane wrote:so i think in general players like to feel important
i think UT hasn't particularly felt this way ( a lot of players have, this game is very very big)
and i think that leads UT to be argumentative, in attempts to feel like they matter.

jhust a theory tho

whatever you have to tell yourself

In post 8955, Wooper wrote:......

and UT responded to this by asking you to tell him he's a bad player?

I don't know what you're getting at

In post 8953, Untrod Tripod wrote:

In post 8951, Wooper wrote:I had a sneaking suspicion

like forcing manipulative stances at the expense of trying to work out people's intent and shit is clearly scum motivated

expand on this

so there's this town alignment right
who need to work out who the scums are and lynch them
and this scum alignment who already know who they are but need to not lynch them

bit of a shocker but town have a tendency to have a thought process in determining who the scums are before trying to lynch them. scum have a tendency to push lynches on folks who just aren't scum so their reasoning doesn't always really line up

I'm seeing all push no reasoning from you which has me thinking maybe - just maybe - you're the scums

the fact that you're resulting to manipulative discrediting shit like your comments abt me wanting to lynch you, asking Miss Lynch to call you a bad player, w/e makes me think you're playing to win some kinda pissing contest and come out the better player. it feels like optics not solving. you're playing to a crowd, not playing to solve

all of this is manipulative at the expense of looking like you're trying to solve the gsme. it can come from town sure, but I'm like, absolutely baffled as to why I should townread you

In post 8956, Untrod Tripod wrote:

In post 8954, Miss Lane wrote:so i think in general players like to feel important
i think UT hasn't particularly felt this way ( a lot of players have, this game is very very big)
and i think that leads UT to be argumentative, in attempts to feel like they matter.

jhust a theory tho

whatever you have to tell yourself

What reason would I have to tell myself anything like this? It's just a theory.
I feel in no way attacked or threatened by you. You bear no weight on me.


That said, do you have a better reason why you've been needlessly argumentative with Amrun?

needlessly argumentative in general,a ctually.

In post 8958, Wooper wrote:

In post 8953, Untrod Tripod wrote:

In post 8951, Wooper wrote:I had a sneaking suspicion

like forcing manipulative stances at the expense of trying to work out people's intent and shit is clearly scum motivated

expand on this

so there's this town alignment right
who need to work out who the scums are and lynch them
and this scum alignment who already know who they are but need to not lynch them

bit of a shocker but town have a tendency to have a thought process in determining who the scums are before trying to lynch them. scum have a tendency to push lynches on folks who just aren't scum so their reasoning doesn't always really line up

I'm seeing all push no reasoning from you which has me thinking maybe - just maybe - you're the scums

the fact that you're resulting to manipulative discrediting shit like your comments abt me wanting to lynch you, asking Miss Lynch to call you a bad player, w/e makes me think you're playing to win some kinda pissing contest and come out the better player. it feels like optics not solving. you're playing to a crowd, not playing to solve

all of this is manipulative at the expense of looking like you're trying to solve the gsme. it can come from town sure, but I'm like, absolutely baffled as to why I should townread you

oh i see what you're getting at wrt UT trying to discredit themselves

In post 8958, Wooper wrote:

In post 8953, Untrod Tripod wrote:

In post 8951, Wooper wrote:I had a sneaking suspicion

like forcing manipulative stances at the expense of trying to work out people's intent and shit is clearly scum motivated

expand on this

so there's this town alignment right
who need to work out who the scums are and lynch them
and this scum alignment who already know who they are but need to not lynch them

bit of a shocker but town have a tendency to have a thought process in determining who the scums are before trying to lynch them. scum have a tendency to push lynches on folks who just aren't scum so their reasoning doesn't always really line up

I'm seeing all push no reasoning from you which has me thinking maybe - just maybe - you're the scums

the fact that you're resulting to manipulative discrediting shit like your comments abt me wanting to lynch you, asking Miss Lynch to call you a bad player, w/e makes me think you're playing to win some kinda pissing contest and come out the better player. it feels like optics not solving. you're playing to a crowd, not playing to solve

all of this is manipulative at the expense of looking like you're trying to solve the gsme. it can come from town sure, but I'm like, absolutely baffled as to why I should townread you

hey. cupcake.

it's you or zor today. you're just kicking up dirt instead of trying to stay alive. not a great look.

hey muffin you're the one who asked me to elaborate on a mafia theory point lmfao

I'm cool w lynching zor today I just don't want you off the table later and have no idea why I'm a cw

I'm looking for reasons to not vote you

Following UT around is taking effort, I have to switch votes!
VOTE: Wooper

In post 8964, Wooper wrote:have no idea why I'm a cw

...are you...serious?

In post 8967, Untrod Tripod wrote:

In post 8964, Wooper wrote:have no idea why I'm a cw

...are you...serious?

deadly

In post 8964, Wooper wrote:I'm cool w lynching zor today I just don't want you off the table later and have no idea why I'm a cw

Zor can’t be cult.

All cult who died have been recruited it says so in the first few posts
Why you going for confirmed town?

Firebringer is starting to look pretty Sus.

Thank you

In post 8969, Firebringer wrote:

In post 8964, Wooper wrote:I'm cool w lynching zor today I just don't want you off the table later and have no idea why I'm a cw

Zor can’t be cult.

All cult who died have been recruited it says so in the first few posts
Why you going for confirmed town?

I don't understand this firebb

In post 8972, Wooper wrote:

In post 8969, Firebringer wrote:

In post 8964, Wooper wrote:I'm cool w lynching zor today I just don't want you off the table later and have no idea why I'm a cw

Zor can’t be cult.

All cult who died have been recruited it says so in the first few posts
Why you going for confirmed town?

I don't understand this firebb

All the cultists who have died have been people turned cultist
So that means no one else has been turned cultist yet they were originally cult or not cult to begin with
Zor could only be cult if he was culted in other words

He can’t be cult

Does that exclude him from being another antitown faction or