Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:46 am**

Johhog, one post above him...

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:52 am**

Ah, the last place you'd look.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:31 am**

Okay.

So.

Oversoul will

not

be lynched today.

At least for the foreseeable future while I try and work something out.

VOTE: DavidX

Very little content.

No scum-hunting.

Much better lynch than Oversoul.

Empking wrote:
vote: joh

Since when was johhog a scum-read of yours?

Empking wrote:Town
Estyn
Fool
Mastin

Joh

Oversoul
red
Vi

Empking wrote:
Johhog wrote:I'm not doing reads in pre-game, sorry. Don't think that pre-game is that much readable

100% town.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:37 am**

Come at me bro. Let's see how fast your scumbuddies jump on the wagon.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:42 am**

Hop: Since884

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:09 am**

Empking wrote:Hop: Since884

Ahem, I'll assume you mistyped. What post did you really mean?

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:16 am**

Empking wrote:Hop: Since 884

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:17 am**

David Xanatos wrote:Come at me bro. Let's see how fast your scumbuddies jump on the wagon.

This looks like it's missing a vote.

Always hard to remember the small things like that as scum, never mind.

Empking wrote:Hop: Since884

Unfortunately Secret Project is

much

more likely town than Oversoul (who I won't be lynching today barring unpredictable circumstances) so 2/3 of that is invalid.

Johhog wrote:
Empking wrote:Hop: Since884

Ahem, I'll assume you mistyped. What post did you really mean?

wut

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:18 am**

Lolol Emp. Oh well, I can't even respond to that, so let it be so then.

Hoppster: Because post 884 that he's referencing was one very crappy post, and even if he agreed with Matt's case I can't see why post 884 would convince him.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:21 am**

Johhog wrote:Lolol Emp. Oh well, I can't even respond to that, so let it be so then.

Hoppster: Because post 884 that he's referencing was one very crappy post, and even if he agreed with Matt's case I can't see why post 884 would convince him.

Not just that, your post was very sorely lacking a DavidX vote. Empking at least has something he can/is point(ing) to to explain his vote, but I see no explanation for your lack of a DavidX vote.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:29 am**

Wait, since when do we have to explain why we

don't

vote anyone?

The truth is, I don't know. He's not giving me any scum vibes right now. Not town vibes either but... well...

Let's see after a couple of pages more, let him post more first.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:35 am**

Johhog wrote:Wait, since when do we have to explain why we
don't
vote anyone?

The truth is, I don't know. He's not giving me any scum vibes right now. Not town vibes either but... well...

Let's see after a couple of pages more, let him post more first.

How about you look at my case and tell me why it's not convincing you to vote for him?

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:36 am**

Hoppster wrote:VOTE: DavidX

Very little content.
No scum-hunting.

Here it is Johhog. Nice and short and to the point.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:39 am**

After quickly glancing at his ISO, I'll have to admit you're right.

Well, fuck it, I don't care if it's looking scummy and I want something to happen.

VOTE: David Xanatos

TRY TO LYNCH ME FUCKERS. I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR FAIL CASES.

...which sounds a lot like David. >_>

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:18 am**

Hi John. Why don't you answer the question I posted at the end of the the last page that you ever-so kindly ignored? You disregarding all of my posts as trash because I think you are scum is arrogant player regardless of the alligment. If you think I should change and be pointed in the right direction, point me in the right direction. Until then, I think you are scum. And yes, I do think you were bussing Secret Project. Try to prove me wrong.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:24 am**

projectmatt wrote:Hi John. Why don't you answer the question I posted at the end of the the last page that you ever-so kindly ignored? You disregarding all of my posts as trash because I think you are scum is arrogant player regardless of the alligment. If you think I should change and be pointed in the right direction, point me in the right direction. Until then, I think you are scum. And yes, I do think you were bussing Secret Project. Try to prove me wrong.

projectmatt wrote:And do you think my catch-up post is a lie completely because I marked you down as scum?

Is this the question you mean? If so, because you paint my town behaviour as scummy. I don't know what else to answer, but luckily I don't feel the need to say something else.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:44 am**

I understand I marked you down as scum. Do you think the entire catch-up post is bad because of it? Even the parts not involving you? Also, what town behavior do you think I am wrong with?

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:19 am**

Mainly my wagoning, reaction testing and also you're criticising policy votes and think they're scummy. I mean, really?

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 10:17 am**

I think xanatos's town play consists of being useless, not even attempting to scumhunt, being cryptic and not really putting in any effort and bragging about it. town read. oversoul and johhog are scummiest but i gotta reread.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 10:43 am**

Far from it my friend. I'm taking notes here, I like to vary my play.. see what works. Consider this an experiment, if you will.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:44 pm**

Hoppster wrote:Okay.

So.

Oversoul will
not
be lynched today.

At least for the foreseeable future while I try and work something out.

While I don't object to a David Xanatos lynch per se, I don't understand your reason for wanting to rule Oversoul out. What bothers me is him (a) self-voting; and then (b) after the town backed off of him, he cites his self-vote as proof positive that he is town. What town-motivation is there in that sequence?

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:47 pm**

Johhog wrote:Mainly my wagoning, reaction testing and also you're criticising policy votes and think they're scummy. I mean, really?

"your wagoning"

You mean your random read that comes out of nowhere that consists of you telling everyone to join their wagon in all caps and then two seconds later you never mention this read again. (but you don't unvote, of course.) And you don't even mention this player in your LIST OF READS after you go for the wagon.

"your reaction testing"

You mean your subtle attempts to get Vifam quicklynched out of anger when he does nothing scummy in particular? The three page wall-of-text flamewar that you get aggressive in for no particular reason is a reaction test?

"your policy votes"

Lynching the lurkers, the VI's or the people you don't like is anti-town. Why? Because it doesn't mean you are lynching the scum. It means you are lynching the people you don't like, not the scum. That's playing against your win condition.

So yeah, I mean, really.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:22 pm**

Ironhead wrote:
Hoppster wrote:
Oversoul will
not
be lynched today.

At least for the foreseeable future while I try and work something out.

While I don't object to a David Xanatos lynch per se, I don't understand your reason for wanting to rule Oversoul out. What bothers me is him (a) self-voting; and then (b) after the town backed off of him, he cites his self-vote as proof positive that he is town. What town-motivation is there in that sequence?

This is the one major issue I have with Oversoul and I completely agree that it doesn't make sense from a town PoV.

Unfortunately people are stupid/selfish sometimes. I'm having to attribute this instance to stupidity/selfishness for the time being, as my doubts from the self-vote are completely overruled, pertaining to matters which I'm not at liberty to discuss.

David Xanatos wrote:Far from it my friend. I'm taking notes here, I like to vary my play.. see what works. Consider this an experiment, if you will.

This really isn't working for you.

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:48 pm**

David Xanatos wrote:Far from it my friend. I'm taking notes here, I like to vary my play.. see what works. Consider this an experiment, if you will.

Hint. It isn't working.

And that is a shitty excuse for playing the way you are playing.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: DavidX

Mastin, where is your charisma? Your swagger? Your confidence? I loved your play in Sexy Sedilla, but after the fail lynch you just seemed to take on a whole different air. Please listen to us that the self pity thing, while emotionally stressful, doesn't help us and brings down the mood of the whole game. I am the type of person who rides on other's emotions. If a game is going slow, I probably won't take interest in it and post less often. If a game is full of people who are geared up and ready to fight, chances are everyone is interested.

Do you still believe I am scum? Or that anyone on your early reads list is right?

Posted: **Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:52 pm**

David pulled the same shit in [REDACTED].

It angers me, but he's probably town.

Mafiascum.net

New York 138: OxyMoron Mafia :: Game Over!