Page 37 of 148

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:08 pm
by Slandaar
That doesn't say 1v1's are scummy.

Do you think that applies to me Majiffy? Or perhaps I just want to lynch Cryo because he is scum? you work it out.
Context; why does he want to enter a 1v1 with someone he didn't have a read on? difference is huge.

899; lol do you really think 327 is part of what I consider the case? obviously not. 348 is a scumtell; how about you explain why its not? part of its WIFOM to some degree but I stopped on the logical level which is how WIFOM works and how you determine scum from town tells. All tells are in essence WIFOM. Whats wrong with my associative tells again? They are good yes?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:13 pm
by Slandaar
Read the first page

There you go, proof its a scumtell; I knew from his first post he was scum.

Now you can explain why you think its not Majiffy.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:26 pm
by Majiffy
Slandaar wrote:Read the first page

There you go, proof its a scumtell; I knew from his first post he was scum.

Now you can explain why you think its not Majiffy.

Great sample size of (1) one occurrence involving a different scenario from a different player.
That really strengthens your argument.

And 348 isn't a scumtell because I've done it plenty of times myself
as town.


Slandaar wrote:Whats wrong with my associative tells again? They are good yes?

They're on unflipped players, so no, they're not good.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:27 pm
by Majiffy
VOTE: Slandaar

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:36 pm
by Slandaar
Majiffy wrote:
And 348 isn't a scumtell because I've done it plenty of times myself
as town.


Theres another one

Its a scumtell I really couldn't care less what you think.

I can't be bothered getting a ton of them to show. The fact is its theory and I stand by it, its how I play. You probably do believe what you say; but I believe what I say and its theory.
Slandaar wrote:Whats wrong with my associative tells again? They are good yes?

They're on unflipped players, so no, they're not good.[/quote]
So? I should not point them out when I see them?

Majiffy is scum.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:46 pm
by Mac
Ms Marangal wrote:Mac, it's mostly PoE, and the fact that I feel that the quietest people are probably scum.

KoC is still scummier then you though, and so is GIF.

I feel that GIF is trying to keep from saying anything to productive, and KoC is trying to be productive to hide his scumminess.


just a quick question here: you have went through everyone and, by PoE, found me to be scum? this makes no sense.

you call me quiet and yet there are loads less quiet than me. you have a weak as fuck reason for calling me scum here. I'm glad you aren't pushing it.

not sure about KoC, but I kinda agree with you about GIF. the locust thing early on also sticks out in my mind too. there's another reason that I'd rather not say too

VOTE: GuyInFreezer

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:51 pm
by AngryPidgeon
Jal wrote:While I do so, Ap you're going to have to tell me how I keep you sane when I left off with a Mastin vote vastly disagreed with.

You keeping me sane has nothing to do with your reads.

Majiffy wrote:Because unflipped associative tells always work!

Said the guy calling a KoC/AP team.

Slandaar wrote:Majiffy is scum.

I know, right? Its not super apparent until he makes a cse on you. Then you realize hes just full of it.

P-edit: ^ Hmph. That post makes me kind of want to sheep it. We need to start narrowing our options down. Personally I'd love to lynch Majiffy. MollieKittens, what were your opinions on that slot?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:52 pm
by Majiffy
Slandaar wrote:So? I should not point them out when I see them?

Majiffy is scum.

You shouldn't use them as an argument to lynch a different player.

Nice OMGUS.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:52 pm
by GuyInFreezer
@Mac: Why would you hide that "another reason" ?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:53 pm
by Mac
GuyInFreezer wrote:@Mac: Why would you hide that "another reason" ?


From scum.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:53 pm
by Majiffy
AngryPidgeon wrote:
Majiffy wrote:Because unflipped associative tells always work!

Said the guy calling a KoC/AP team.

I'm not calling you two scum together, I'm just calling you both scummy.
And furthermore, I'm not calling you scummy because of associative tells on unflipped players.

Let me tell you how many times I've actually seen that work...
I'll get back to you on that, this is a toughie.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:02 pm
by Messiah
If you think Majiffy actually believes what he says, Slandaar, why is he scum? In your reads post you listed him as town. Searching for mentions of Majiffy in your iso it looks like that suspicion manifested itself rather suddenly.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:05 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Mac wrote:
GuyInFreezer wrote:@Mac: Why would you hide that "another reason" ?


From scum.

That doesn't make sense. If you think I'm scum, won't you want to share that info to other ppl so that you can convince them to hop on my wagon?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:09 pm
by Mac
ISO Ms. Marangal's posts GIF, and you'll see why I voted you and why you shouldn't be voting Ms. M right now.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:10 pm
by The Goat
CryoChemist wrote:Without the spaces in the first and last brackets, his looked like this: [ url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go]
Messiah's iso
[/url ]

Basically, copy the webpage address of the ISO, put it in URL brackets and type what you want it to say in the part I bolded.


Let me rephrase:

I don't know how to get the iso. I'm feeling fairly stupid for it.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:11 pm
by GuyInFreezer
So me voting Ms.M is part of the reason that you voted me?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:11 pm
by The Goat
Never mind. I figured it out.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:15 pm
by Messiah
GuyInFreezer wrote:'Cause she's scum and she's not pleased with me catching her not voting.

GuyInFreezer wrote:Also,
VOTE: Ms.M.

I don't like this bit of suspicion at all. It comes off as contriving a reason to vote and look like you're scumhunting when in reality you're picking at a playstyle quirk. What good does this do if it
is
her playstyle as you were discussing with her in 869/870? And if you didn't believe her when she said as much why didn't you go check?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:16 pm
by Mac
GuyInFreezer wrote:So me voting Ms.M is part of the reason that you voted me?


yes, but clearly you haven't looked back yet. do it.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:18 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Mac wrote:ISO Ms. Marangal's posts GIF, and you'll see why I voted you and why you shouldn't be voting Ms. M right now.


I don't see it. Am I missing somrthing?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:19 pm
by Messiah
She claimed a power role.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:22 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Oh.

UNVOTE:
For now, then.

@Messiah: My point was that she overreacted when she could've just said it was just her playstyle.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:35 pm
by Slandaar
Majiffy wrote:
You shouldn't use them as an argument to lynch a different player.

Nice OMGUS.

Well considering I am not actually trying to lynch them at all your argument holds no weight.

Does OMGUS mean anything Majiffy?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:38 pm
by Slandaar
AngryPidgeon wrote:
I know, right? Its not super apparent until he makes a cse on you. Then you realize hes just full of it.

Basically my exact thoughts.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:42 pm
by Majiffy
Slandaar wrote:Well considering I am not actually trying to lynch them at all your argument holds no weight.

Does OMGUS mean anything Majiffy?

If you're not trying to lynch Cryo, why is your vote on them, and why have you spent a good majority of your posts saying how scummy Cryo is?

OMGUS means a lot when you suddenly call someone scum out of the blue because they called you out, yeah.