Mafiascum.net

In post 763, ferretlover wrote:If you were drunk then why be on the internet in the first place.

You also said "it reflects bad on your alignment", which makes it sound like your already know my alignment. Explain?

Okay, seriously.

I cannot tell if you're a Mormon or a Moron, but you should probably stop this. If ANYTHING, you should encourage drunk posting. Why? Because people make stupid mistakes when they're drunk, like scumslipping.

Your pursuit of me based on my playing while inebriated is silly. I enjoy having fun sober. I enjoy having fun while drinking. I am a remarkably responsible person in both states, and drinking makes me no more likely to be scum than playing while sober.

Your implication that one should not bother being on the Internet while drunk is condescending and dismissive.

Please knock it off.

Gonna ISO Krab. Back soon.

I was just saying my opinion on it. I don't like the idea of alcohol in general, but I would stay away from the internet iff I was drunk.

And Town will make scumslips too if they are drunk and not careful, so that degrades your point.

In post 903, ferretlover wrote:And Town will make scumslips too if they are drunk and not careful, so that degrades your point.

You and I differ in opinion on what a "scumslip" is, then. I would think that one would have to be scum to scumslip. Perhaps I'm using terminology I lack expertise with, but I think you know what I mean.

In post 902, ferretlover wrote:I was just saying my opinion on it. I don't like the idea of alcohol in general, but I would stay away from the internet iff I was drunk.

You and I differ. For what its worth, e-mail and texting are off limits if I get drunk. But the Internet is a fun place while drinking. At least for me.

In what will likely be an unpopular statement...

...I do not support the Krab wagon.

Man, that was a pretty damn fast ISO. Sounds kind of like GCBC...

He doesn't have many posts. Have you looked?

In post 880, RATEDR wrote:Also, Vifam. Not much has changed since you left, at least not in my opinion

Don't you have a QT to mention this in?

In post 892, Darthe wrote:Okay, perhaps I am missing something here but from my read of the game it doesn't seem that we have any sort of clear direction thus far. I mean, yeah it is day one but we should at least be involved with one another rather than certain groups on other groups right?

I have absolutely no idea what this is saying at all. Find scum.

In post 906, The Goat wrote:In what will likely be an unpopular statement...

...I do not support the Krab wagon.

Why did you think this would be unpopular?

I mean, like, you have to think about EVERY SINGLE POST, even if it's only 39 of them. Each one has to be thought through and they have to be summed up at the end to make a final decision.

In post 885, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 872, petapan wrote:

In post 868, Nero Cain wrote:I think he may have townslipped. I'll read him in more detail tomorrow.

elaborate on this

I was in a game awhle back and I really really really thought some newbie was scum and they made a post that I thought was really really scummy and too dumb to come from town. Krab said something very similar and it made me pause.

In post 551, Krab Bucket wrote:Claiming neutral, then demanding that a Vigi goes on one of the most pro-town players in the game at this moment in time?

Sure, its not impossible for this to come from scum and I don't think I'll cry but well, I just rather see other players lynched.

Ehhhhh...

Not really seeing how that could be a Townslip, to be honest with you. Would it be possible/feasible to dig up that other newbie's post and link us to it so we have a frame of reference? That would be really helpful.

If not, though, don't sweat it.

In post 887, Svenskt Stål wrote:I have a hard time seeing scum first playing with the idea of claiming...then not going throu with it.

Except Krab didn't have to make the decision of whether he should go through with it or not. He realized that he shot himself in the foot and replaced out specifically so he wouldn't have to go through with it.

In post 892, Darthe wrote:I mean, yeah it is day one but we should at least be involved with one another rather than certain groups on other groups right?

How are we not "involved with one another"? Who are these "certain groups"?

In post 893, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 886, Ravenpaw wrote:

In post 624, Krab Bucket wrote: Might as well claim soon.

^ This felt like a soft-claim to me.

What kind of claim this is? I didn't understand.

Put yourself in Krab Bucket's (probably soggy) shoes. You get some heat on you, and in an effort to get rid of some of it, you decide to say "Might as well claim soon." Under what circumstances would you make that statement? Would you make that statement if you were a Vanilla Townie? No, you wouldn't. You would only say that if you were a PR whose claim was worth a damn or if you were Scum who was trying to bluff her way out of a sticky situation. Which of those two possibilities do you think applies to Krab Bucket?

I'm not keen on the Krab wagon either. I don't understand the case against them.

Shhhh. You don't matter, Ferretlover.

In post 909, xMALCOLMx wrote:

In post 880, RATEDR wrote:Also, Vifam. Not much has changed since you left, at least not in my opinion

Don't you have a QT to mention this in?

In post 892, Darthe wrote:Okay, perhaps I am missing something here but from my read of the game it doesn't seem that we have any sort of clear direction thus far. I mean, yeah it is day one but we should at least be involved with one another rather than certain groups on other groups right?

I have absolutely no idea what this is saying at all. Find scum.

In post 906, The Goat wrote:In what will likely be an unpopular statement...

...I do not support the Krab wagon.

Why did you think this would be unpopular?

Because he's the LVG.

In post 914, The Goat wrote:Because he's the LVG.

Okay. So do you have a reason you don't like the Krab wagon, or...?

I don't get the Krab wagon either. Why do we think it's worth perusing?

In post 909, xMALCOLMx wrote:

In post 880, RATEDR wrote:Also, Vifam. Not much has changed since you left, at least not in my opinion

Don't you have a QT to mention this in?

In post 892, Darthe wrote:Okay, perhaps I am missing something here but from my read of the game it doesn't seem that we have any sort of clear direction thus far. I mean, yeah it is day one but we should at least be involved with one another rather than certain groups on other groups right?

I have absolutely no idea what this is saying at all.

Find scum.

In post 906, The Goat wrote:In what will likely be an unpopular statement...

...I do not support the Krab wagon.

Why did you think this would be unpopular?

In post 910, ferretlover wrote:I mean, like, you have to think about EVERY SINGLE POST, even if it's only 39 of them. Each one has to be thought through and they have to be summed up at the end to make a final decision.

Found it!

i dont get why the malcolm wagon is so hard to push. Look at what malcolm is posting, there is close to nothing in terms of thoughts on the game, its just endless short questions, or sometimes comments that leaves much to be desired.

Also notice that he hasnt even refuted my claim that this isnt nachos town game.

In post 914, The Goat wrote:Because he's the LVG.

What does this mean? Can't find it on the wiki.

In post 788, Desperado wrote: @ Darthe why is ferret in your town and scum lists?

In post 890, GoodCopBadCop wrote:

@Malcom

Malcom wrote:If you post something better than "LURKER LURKER LURKER LURKER" you might be able to get something done, but not until then. I'm not opposed to a rated wagon after Krabs is lynched though.

Agreed. I got a gut scum read on Rated.

I echo this sentiment, but it's more then a gut read for me. He avoids answering my questions and throws silly accusations at me that make no sense.

In post 917, Darthe wrote:

In post 909, xMALCOLMx wrote:

In post 880, RATEDR wrote:Also, Vifam. Not much has changed since you left, at least not in my opinion

Don't you have a QT to mention this in?

In post 892, Darthe wrote:Okay, perhaps I am missing something here but from my read of the game it doesn't seem that we have any sort of clear direction thus far. I mean, yeah it is day one but we should at least be involved with one another rather than certain groups on other groups right?

I have absolutely no idea what this is saying at all.

Find scum.

In post 906, The Goat wrote:In what will likely be an unpopular statement...

...I do not support the Krab wagon.

Why did you think this would be unpopular?

In post 910, ferretlover wrote:I mean, like, you have to think about EVERY SINGLE POST, even if it's only 39 of them. Each one has to be thought through and they have to be summed up at the end to make a final decision.

Found it!

Vote Ferret

wut

A vote count would be pretty sexy right now.