Page 37 of 95
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:11 am
by borkjerfkin
no vc last night on account of i was drunk
[3] MafiaSSK (zMuffinMan, BROseidon, Psychlone)
[2] BROseidon (thenewearth, mastin2)
[2] pieguyn (Varsoon, Mac)
[2] thenewearth (pieguyn, thezmon221)
[1] Morph the Cat (waynegg)
[3] Not Voting (MafiaSSK, Morph the Cat, Ghostly Penguin)
With 13 alive, it is 7 to lynch.
Let me know if you see any problems.
Deadline is in (expired on 2013-11-14 13:00:00)
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:15 am
by mastin2
But drunken VCs are the best VCs!
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:07 am
by MafiaSSK
In post 888, zMuffinMan wrote:if the mafiassk wagon goes nowhere, i'll probably join the bro wagon.
oh, and i'm not gonna be around much for the next 48ish hours.
See, this is just way too opportunistic. He's just going for the easy wagon. No reasoning behind why he would switch to bro. Minimal on why he has his vote on me. It's cray.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:10 am
by thezmon221
Sorry I slacked yesterday; I got Call of Duty Ghosts. Probably won't do much tomorrow either. I got plans.
Fuck this.
VOTE: MafiaSSKMafiaSSK wrote: In post 888, zMuffinMan wrote:if the mafiassk wagon goes nowhere, i'll probably join the bro wagon.
oh, and i'm not gonna be around much for the next 48ish hours.
See, this is just way too opportunistic. He's just going for the easy wagon. No reasoning behind why he would switch to bro. Minimal on why he has his vote on me. It's cray.
Hey, here's the problem. There's just about only one reason TO vote for you: You lurk like hell. You have what, 4 posts in this game? IIRC, you also ask an obvious af question to look like you were contributing when you really weren't.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:12 am
by MafiaSSK
Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:23 am
by morph the cat
In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
It is an informative lynch, since you're playing in a way that makes it impossible to guess your alignment.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:25 am
by morph the cat
VOTE: MafiaSSK
That might be L-2.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:29 am
by mastin2
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:32 am
by mastin2
For the record--I want an SSK claim, but not a lynch. (At least, not yet.) While I think he's scum, he's far from certainly-scum, and I want us to all have time to analyze his wagon from both perspectives. If he's scum, who his scumbuddies are (such as if they're bussing, and if so, who), if he's town, who the scumteam is (and how many if any are on the wagon).
Again. Kinda sorta thinking the scumteam is or is planning to bus SSK because he's not exactly a stellarly-strong scum player, but also think that they'd probably not be overly keen to jump on an easy mislynch; scum like those to be made up almost or entirely of town. This is just my guideline, not a rule, so I could be wrong, but even if not, I think there's some merit to it.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:32 am
by morph the cat
How do you currently feel about MafiaSSK?
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:33 am
by mastin2
In post 908, mastin2 wrote:While I think he's scum, he's far from certainly-scum, and I want us to all have time to analyze his wagon from both perspectives.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:52 am
by MafiaSSK
Claim: Keine Kamishirasawa, VT (TV)
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:13 am
by morph the cat
In post 2, borkjerfkin wrote:
>>>Important: There are eyes and ears everywhere. Flavor Claim at your own risk in this game.<<<
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:24 am
by mastin2
For future reference, when I say claim, I mean ROLE. Not full.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:41 am
by thezmon221
In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.
So I agree with you.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:11 pm
by morph the cat
In post 914, thezmon221 wrote: In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.
So I agree with you.
How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:29 pm
by Psychlone
In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
In post 915, morph the cat wrote: In post 914, thezmon221 wrote: In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.
So I agree with you.
How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?
How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:32 pm
by morph the cat
In post 916, Psychlone wrote: In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
In post 915, morph the cat wrote: In post 914, thezmon221 wrote: In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.
So I agree with you.
How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?
How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?
Better.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:40 pm
by Psychlone
8. Psychlone (GuyInFreezer + Nachomamma8) <- GiF seems less serious in this game than what I know of his scumgame, but that's from my one completed game with him, which isn't even on this site, so I'm not sure how accurate that even is. I was thinking he didn't seem to be actually doing much and instead just responding to things, but disengagement explains that.
Just in case ppl are wondering.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:42 pm
by Psychlone
In post 869, waynegg wrote:
I meant what's with making japes at a legit reason to think someone's lying?
I'm still lost.
Help me find my way there.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:21 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 914, thezmon221 wrote: In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.
So I agree with you.
There are equally valid wagons to analyze where there's also content from that player to analyze as well. And votes from that player. My only vote so far has been my RVS vote, right? I give you less wagons to analyze of lower quality and when I'm gone the quality of the game won't increase by any significant margins because everyone will still be here.
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:22 pm
by morph the cat
In post 920, MafiaSSK wrote: In post 914, thezmon221 wrote: In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.
So I agree with you.
There are equally valid wagons to analyze where there's also content from that player to analyze as well. And votes from that player. My only vote so far has been my RVS vote, right? I give you less wagons to analyze of lower quality and when I'm gone the quality of the game won't increase by any significant margins because everyone will still be here.
Is this intentional play on your part?
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:23 pm
by waynegg
In post 914, thezmon221 wrote: In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.
So I agree with you.
Scumotivation
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:25 pm
by waynegg
Did you miss my thing about " to be honest with you" and it's variants?
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:31 pm
by pieguyn
oh my god wtf
I dreamed last night that when I woke up this game suddenly had 107 pages, and someone had dayvig'd zmuffin and he had flipped mafia doctor. what the hell is wrong with me @_@
In post 897, morph the cat wrote:We initially called it "obvious as fuck" and I think pie is using the term ironically (i.e., he disagrees that it was obvious as fuck).
this
In post 884, Mac wrote:quickly though: pieguy - opinion on morph (quick summary will do, dont make me iso because im pages behind)
I think she's town but omfg paranoia. liking her questions and analysis of players. re: "scumslip", see above. I missed that it was a reaction test until she outright told me it was.