Mafiascum.net

In post 897, sangres wrote:No.

In post 900, Venmar wrote:

In post 897, sangres wrote:No.

So we're both on vanity wagons atm. I'm thinking about how to fix that. What are you doing?

In post 901, sangres wrote:So we're both on vanity wagons atm. I'm thinking about how to fix that. What are you doing?

idk

In post 899, chamber wrote:

In post 892, Vi wrote:

In post 891, Shadoweh wrote:insults don't really bother me as much as people being wrong.

Reck is doing both as evidenced above. You should be sufficiently bothered by this to vote him.

Whats bothering me is that he's sheeping me. I never got the impression that he had a very positive opinion of my ability.

More to the point, it was clearly an excuse.

Venmar, it might be time to set Nero Cain aside. May I interest you in a Reck wagon for reasons shown in the last two pages alone?

[/area]

Shadoweh.

- i don't know, do i get townpoints if I sheeping you?

though on a serious scale, reckoner doesn't interest me that much since i can't read him well, and his current actions don't scream scum to me, the only other wagon right now that interests me is shadoweh really

In post 903, Sixty wrote:More to the point, it was clearly an excuse.

Why does he need an excuse? He doesn't.

In post 908, chamber wrote:

In post 903, Sixty wrote:More to the point, it was clearly an excuse.

Why does he need an excuse? He doesn't.

Momentum.

No, yes I know it has nothing to do with your vote, yes voting you is a sin, I am not convinced it's a good idea. I'm not sure how much of that is hesitation with going with any idea at this point. The only reason I'm considering going with it is because it might move the game forward.
Venmar, I don't actually have a wagon at this point. CDB is still voting me for early game reasons and NS voted me for being a mean person.

Venmar:
So you see someone sheeping a person who they don't particularly respect as a player, go back and check their interactions with us, and then outright lie about them, and you still don't know how to read them?

Hint: it's scum.

(The lines above go for Shadoweh as well.)

Your vote on Nero Cain is doing a grand total of zero things. You keep popping up now and again and asking for votes. No one has followed you. So please come over and place a vote on scum on a wagon that is actually happening.


Also, thanks, ffery. I know you don't like to be rushed, but I was getting annoyed with the whole "let's complain about this wagon while being on a vanity wagon" shtick, so it's good to see things happening.

In post 909, Sixty wrote:

In post 908, chamber wrote:

In post 903, Sixty wrote:More to the point, it was clearly an excuse.

Why does he need an excuse? He doesn't.

Momentum.

Those are related how?

You can't get a wagon going without reasons to encourage people to do it?
...You completely disagree with that come to think of it.

In post 912, chamber wrote:

In post 909, Sixty wrote:

In post 908, chamber wrote:

In post 903, Sixty wrote:More to the point, it was clearly an excuse.

Why does he need an excuse? He doesn't.

Momentum.

Those are related how?

An excuse to vote Sixty? easier than looking for content to post
though it makes for a nice segue into looking for some excuse for doing it as an attempt to justify it

>.>

<.<

In post 913, Shadoweh wrote:You can't get a wagon going without reasons to encourage people to do it?
...You completely disagree with that come to think of it.

I'm still capable of understanding that others would feel that need.

How is sheeping me such a reason?

In post 899, chamber wrote:

In post 892, Vi wrote:

In post 891, Shadoweh wrote:insults don't really bother me as much as people being wrong.

Reck is doing both as evidenced above. You should be sufficiently bothered by this to vote him.

Whats bothering me is that he's sheeping me. I never got the impression that he had a very positive opinion of my ability.

I'm not really following your progression from this post, and have no idea what you think of the sudden reck wagon.

In post 917, sangres wrote:

In post 899, chamber wrote:

In post 892, Vi wrote:

In post 891, Shadoweh wrote:insults don't really bother me as much as people being wrong.

Reck is doing both as evidenced above. You should be sufficiently bothered by this to vote him.

Whats bothering me is that he's sheeping me. I never got the impression that he had a very positive opinion of my ability.

I'm not really following your progression from this post, and have no idea what you think of the sudden reck wagon.

Your confusion is likely caused by the fact the the wagon is made up of 2 null reads and 2 scum reads.

In post 904, sangres wrote:

VOTE: Reck

In post 915, Venmar wrote:>.>

<.<

vote reck

why thoo

In post 894, Sixty wrote:It has nothing to do with Reck insulting you, but the fact that he's making up stuff about us not responding to him. He's pretending to have actually read us when he was just skimming and using whatever argument was convenient for him at the time to justify a horrible vote.


And simulposting because puppy be mad and puppy does

not

have a cape.

I may be able to arrange for a mask, though. Photoshop ho!

No, your case was a cute little narrative built on things that aren't true? You implied I was trying to get a wagon on Shadoweh in your post; I explained that she was just being rude as fuck and I didn't want a wagon on her. You ignore it.

But whatever, I can't wait for my inevitable push to L-1 where I'll claim and people will back down then you two will keep your heads planed so far up your own fucking assholes that you will continue to be wrong the rest of the game and nobody will bat an eye and I'll eventually get lynched then come in and be a fucking cunt to Tierce post-game.

It's beautiful, really.

fery how much are you and nacho discussing and or agreeing on reads?

In post 899, chamber wrote:

In post 892, Vi wrote:

In post 891, Shadoweh wrote:insults don't really bother me as much as people being wrong.

Reck is doing both as evidenced above. You should be sufficiently bothered by this to vote him.

Whats bothering me is that he's sheeping me. I never got the impression that he had a very positive opinion of my ability.

I don't think I've ever given the impression of the opposite? You've been around awhile, I generally respect most people with a join date older than mine unless I have specific reasons not to

In post 918, chamber wrote:

In post 917, sangres wrote:

In post 899, chamber wrote:

In post 892, Vi wrote:

In post 891, Shadoweh wrote:insults don't really bother me as much as people being wrong.

Reck is doing both as evidenced above. You should be sufficiently bothered by this to vote him.

Whats bothering me is that he's sheeping me. I never got the impression that he had a very positive opinion of my ability.

I'm not really following your progression from this post, and have no idea what you think of the sudden reck wagon.

Your confusion is likely caused by the fact the the wagon is made up of 2 null reads and 2 scum reads.

Unofficial vote count wrote:xRECKONERx (4) ~ Lady Lambdadelta, Sixty, sangres, Venmar

chamber

seriously?



seriously.

btw if i had 2 choose between 60 or reck id keep reck.