Mafiascum.net

(3) - Malakittens, implosion, notscience
(2) - Nachomamma8, Bert
(1) - sthar8
(1) - Aneninen
(1) - nopointinactingup

(1) - AGar

↑ Bert wrote:VOTE: nachomamma8[/vot]

Did u read what Mala and co said bout

Nopoint' associatives and interaction with neal

I'm watching football but I'm here

Hi, Nacho! Try to catch up soon, please! Especially since I've been scumreading your slot ^_^

@Bert. Couldn't you provide some of your thoughts now?
_____

Time is running and apart from NPIAU I can't see real wagons. Yes, it's obvious that he's trying to build a counter-wagon right now but this is not an alignment tell, I suppose.
What if the game is stalled because none of the scums were generally suspected Today – and they don't need to do anything but waiting for a next mislynch?

_____

Post-edit. Wow, so many new posts! Some of the things above might be obsolete right now, since the last post I saw before righting this was Sthar8's #886.

I'm voting notscience for reasons that make me 80% sure that he's scum. I don't really need to catchup beyond that point: I can respond to your case on my predecessors but my effort this game day is going to go towards lynching scum and not reassuring people that I am town.

@Nacho: Because I don't think NPIAU is a good lynch now, I'd sheep you... if I didn't have a scumread on your slot. Can you link a game you were replaced in? (FYI: that slot was scumread by me on early-Day2 but I dropped the case. Might it been a mistake? If needed, I can link my main post about the case.)

Link me to your post about a case on me and describe to me why you think notscience is a bad lynch.

↑ Bert wrote:Did u read what Mala and co said bout

Nopoint' associatives and interaction with neal

I looked through her non-Day 1 I SO and couldn't find it. Could you link me to it?

Case: mostly in this: 754. (Though, it's a wall and it refers to other links. Yes I know #&@%! my walls, but I'm trying hard to get rid of them.)

I've never thought the Notscience slot would be a bad lynch. You'll find data about the slot in the same post. Another wall about my former case against the slot: 462.

Now, can you link something for me in return?

=11658&user_select[]=0&user_select[]=0&user_sort=Go]This is the last time I replaced into a game that I can remember. I couldn't really link before I got off mobile.

↑ Aneninen wrote:I've never thought the Notscience slot would be a bad lynch. You'll find data about the slot in the same post. Another wall about my former case against the slot: 462.

My lynch doesn't seem to be viable at this point in time, considering new replacement who is actually starting to do things immediately upon replacing in and no one really found this slot scummy in the first place with the exception of you. Seeing this, why do you prefer to lynch nopoint (who you don't think is scum) over notscience (who you do think is scum)? Me voting the notscience slot 1) doesn't make the slot town even if I'm scum, and 2) shouldn't even be giving you a townread on the slot unless you're 100% positive that I am scum unless you only scumhunt with one team possibility at a time in which case

↑ Aneninen wrote:457 from Oso is pretty much "I don't want to be involved" stuff.

This seems to be a true point because Oso replaced out.
I don't think it's scummy to replace out of a game.

↑ Aneninen wrote:Uh-oh! Look at 505! "I had made it clear that I would hammer Niel. But I also wanted both Shadowez and Agar post their thoughts before it happened." – Why wasn't he able to decide whether a slot was scum alone? Yet another "I don't want to be involved" thing. The Phok-case is pretty weak.

In his post, he says that he wanted Shadowez and AGar to post their thoughts in order to see their reaction to the claim, which gives him information on both of their alignment's and on Neil's. He already expressed an opinion of what neil's alignment was (scum). Why is waiting for more information to make a decision (especially especially hard information like claim reaction) scummy?

Oso's case on Phok was that Phok voted neil a lot but never explained any of it. This suggests he couldn't explain any of it because he didn't have any reasons except for inside information. I don't necessarily agree with this case, but I don't see a horrifically bad logical flaw like you seem to be seeing. If your point is actually just that his case isn't very compelling, well, I don't think weak cases automatically equal scum and I don't think you should either.

↑ Aneninen wrote:I posted about BPC's readlist and nearby-posts a lot (I mean those 560-570-ish posts) before.

If you link to your criticisms of those posts, I will respond to them. Otherwise, nope.

↑ Aneninen wrote:I still think that 613/614 are weak answers.

To call someone scum for buddying is to call someone scum for being friendly with another human being. This is not a good point and should never be a part of a case on anyone ever.
I don't see how the autoscum WIFOM joke from BPC was scummy: could you expound on that a little more?
I don't see why calling someone an asshole is alignment indicative.

So maybe his responses weren't particularly compelling but I also don't think your case was particularly strong.

Thanks for your link, though it didn't give me much help. Perhaps my fault.
I'll think about your posts but I need to sleep now. (And yes, I know that my timing is terrible. I'm famous for that, I suppose.)

Don't feel bad. Feel rad!

I would link but I'm on mobile too! War Eagle!

Also, I just noticed that D2, low hanging fruit was lynched.

Nacho don't wagon notty. If you think I'm town then trust me that Notty is town. Please please please

He's sheeping me because I'm asking him to sheep

↑ Malakittens wrote:Nacho don't wagon notty. If you think I'm town then trust me that Notty is town. Please please please

if you have information then claim it
if you don't have information we're lynching notty

and i really really really really really really doubt you have information on notty

↑ Aneninen wrote:I'll think about your posts but I need to sleep now. (And yes, I know that my timing is terrible. I'm famous for that, I suppose.)

That's fine!

↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:

↑ Malakittens wrote:Nacho don't wagon notty. If you think I'm town then trust me that Notty is town. Please please please

if you have information then claim it
if you don't have information we're lynching notty

I do, but I'm not full claiming. Let it go Nacho

That reminds me of you counter claiming Bro in Wicked lol but idc totally different scenario

VOTE: nopointinactingup

Weekends are crazy and I'm in a funk sorry

I'll bike to the library Monday

Since when is nacho in this game

hi nacho

I'm not going to die unless I'm nk'd btw

so you're welcome to keep your vanity vote on me