Page 37 of 107

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:26 am
by Transcend
you did the same damn thing so i don't know what your problem is honestly

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:27 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 893, Thor665 wrote:Because literally the best case I could make is "he's derp tunneling" and I don't think tunneling is scummy, I just think it causes some anti-town issues occasionally.
There's no way he can have such a strong scumread on Michel. Michel looks fine. Just like there's no way he can have such a strong townread on maria.

It looks like he decided what his reads were gonna be and then looked for reasons after the fact. Go reread his ISO. Look @ how many times he calls Michel scum w/o posting any real reason. He never tries to convince anyone that Michel is scum. He knows damn well that screaming "OMG HE'S OBVSCUM" isn't gonna get anyone to follow him.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:28 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 846, Transcend wrote:K hi welcome to this. The way the mason claim came about was ass backwards compared to what happened here. But Titus was getting wagoned and claimed masons with a town that was white knighting her. The WKing town reluctantly obliged to be fakeclaimed masons with her.
In post 793, Titus wrote:
In post 788, Dunnstral wrote:I can hear them howling
Yes, I see round about what you're getting at. We should discuss that more mason buddy but do be carefully. ;)
In post 798, Dunnstral wrote::facepalm: Wasn't going to let you get lynched
I am familiar with that game. She did it because there was no justification she could give that wasn't an ongoing game. You did it because you were losing an argument. She let it go when the mason buddy failed to keep the charade. You tried to push it with obvious mechanical defects.

Your claim looks like you just forcing your way more than being willing to evaluate your reads.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:30 am
by Transcend
Losing an argument?

Was I the one even being lynched?

It was
HER
getting lynched and not ME.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:31 am
by Transcend
i have justified my reasons for lynching michel, you're just a fucking ignorant twat.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:32 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 903, Transcend wrote:Losing an argument?

Was I the one even being lynched?

It was
HER
getting lynched and not ME.
Right but you threw a fit at that. That's why you claimed mason.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:33 am
by Transcend
And if I'm scum, how does Town!Maria getting lynched hurt my game?

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:33 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 904, Transcend wrote:i have justified my reasons for lynching michel, you're just a fucking ignorant twat.
You are rapidly not making me care if you live or die.

Why is the asskissing that passes for Maria town?

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:34 am
by JarJarDrinks
here's another example of him having a read and then coming up w/ reasons after the fact:
In post 111, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 86, Transcend wrote:Shadow: Word to the wise, I never defended Blitzkrieg.

I said that the vote that Michel made on her was shit, and confronted him about it.
No the michel vote was only 1 thing you mentioned. And you didn't even talk about the michel vote right away. The first 2 posts where you "never defended" Blitzkrieg, you were seemingly responding to Thors vote:

Spoiler:
In post 19, Thor665 wrote:
Vote: Blitzkrieg
In post 20, Transcend wrote:this wagon sucks
In post 21, Thor665 wrote:Why do you town read Blitz?
In post 22, Transcend wrote:I don't

But the way she's been wagoned is dumb.

See, no mention of michel.
He says that the wagon sucked (implying that he townreads blitz). But when u confront him about it, he says he was just saying that Michels vote sucked. Which I proved wasn't true.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:34 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 906, Transcend wrote:And if I'm scum, how does Town!Maria getting lynched hurt my game?
Easy pocketing?

Even then, the question assumes you are not buddies.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:36 am
by Transcend
Is pocketing the best strategy for scum!me or is ousting a town number the better strategy........ and not just that but ousting a town number on like page 5 or some shit when they were already at L-1 or some shit.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:38 am
by Transcend
In post 908, JarJarDrinks wrote:here's another example of him having a read and then coming up w/ reasons after the fact:
In post 111, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 86, Transcend wrote:Shadow: Word to the wise, I never defended Blitzkrieg.

I said that the vote that Michel made on her was shit, and confronted him about it.
No the michel vote was only 1 thing you mentioned. And you didn't even talk about the michel vote right away. The first 2 posts where you "never defended" Blitzkrieg, you were seemingly responding to Thors vote:

Spoiler:
In post 19, Thor665 wrote:
Vote: Blitzkrieg
In post 20, Transcend wrote:this wagon sucks
In post 21, Thor665 wrote:Why do you town read Blitz?
In post 22, Transcend wrote:I don't

But the way she's been wagoned is dumb.

See, no mention of michel.
He says that the wagon sucked (implying that he townreads blitz). But when u confront him about it, he says he was just saying that Michels vote sucked. Which I proved wasn't true.
k we get it you're dumb in the head. i have stated several times that i didn't TR blitz, I just said that the vote Michel made was absolute garbage and overjustified nonsense. Am I smart enough to know that scum can bus? Yes.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:39 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 910, Transcend wrote:Is pocketing the best strategy for scum!me or is ousting a town number the better strategy........ and not just that but ousting a town number on like page 5 or some shit when they were already at L-1 or some shit.
VOTE: Transcend

There's not a chance in hell the best scum strategy can be determined without knowing who the scum are and their roles and their tendencies.

However, scum would know a page 5 wagon is unlikely to go through and could defend for credit. Your repeated refusal to show how Maria's conduct today is townie opens this or buddies as possibilities.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:39 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 904, Transcend wrote:i have justified my reasons for lynching michel, you're just a fucking ignorant twat.
Finally on page 34, u made a single post that somewhat explains your read. Doesn't change what I wrote. You deathtunneled for 30+ pages w/o ever telling us why u scumread the person.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:40 am
by Transcend
well what a scummy vote that was lol

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:40 am
by Blitzkrieg
Oh and a third personal insult against JarJar, unmentionable, twat and dumb. Eat rope.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:41 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 914, Transcend wrote:well what a scummy vote that was lol
Flail more.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:41 am
by Transcend
In post 913, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 904, Transcend wrote:i have justified my reasons for lynching michel, you're just a fucking ignorant twat.
Finally on page 34, u made a single post that somewhat explains your read. Doesn't change what I wrote. You deathtunneled for 30+ pages w/o ever telling us why u scumread the person.
I HAVE EXPLAINED THE READ SEVERAL FUCKING TIMES YOU BLIND PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:42 am
by Shadow_step
In post 878, Thor665 wrote:I would lynch Kraska, Maria, or Elyse. I would happily help policy Shadow.
What the hell you on about ?

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:42 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 911, Transcend wrote:
In post 908, JarJarDrinks wrote:here's another example of him having a read and then coming up w/ reasons after the fact:
In post 111, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 86, Transcend wrote:Shadow: Word to the wise, I never defended Blitzkrieg.

I said that the vote that Michel made on her was shit, and confronted him about it.
No the michel vote was only 1 thing you mentioned. And you didn't even talk about the michel vote right away. The first 2 posts where you "never defended" Blitzkrieg, you were seemingly responding to Thors vote:

Spoiler:
In post 19, Thor665 wrote:
Vote: Blitzkrieg
In post 20, Transcend wrote:this wagon sucks
In post 21, Thor665 wrote:Why do you town read Blitz?
In post 22, Transcend wrote:I don't

But the way she's been wagoned is dumb.

See, no mention of michel.
He says that the wagon sucked (implying that he townreads blitz). But when u confront him about it, he says he was just saying that Michels vote sucked. Which I proved wasn't true.
k we get it you're dumb in the head. i have stated several times that i didn't TR blitz, I just said that the vote Michel made was absolute garbage and overjustified nonsense.
Um no. did u open the spoiler tag? I already disproved this.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:43 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 917, Transcend wrote:
In post 913, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 904, Transcend wrote:i have justified my reasons for lynching michel, you're just a fucking ignorant twat.
Finally on page 34, u made a single post that somewhat explains your read. Doesn't change what I wrote. You deathtunneled for 30+ pages w/o ever telling us why u scumread the person.
I HAVE EXPLAINED THE READ SEVERAL FUCKING TIMES YOU BLIND PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT.
Oh sorry I must have missed it. Could you kindly link me to where you did before page 34?

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:43 am
by Transcend
I HAVE EXPLAINED

SEVERAL.


FUCKING.


TIMES.

THAT THE VOTES THE MOTHERFUCKER HAS MADE IN THIS GAME.

APPEAR TO BE.

TACTICAL.

AND NOT.

GENUINE.

JESUS.

FUCKING.

CHRIST.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:43 am
by Blitzkrieg
Wow, Transcend is up to personal insult number 4 rather than reevaluating his "reads". Maybe cuz they are fake.

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:44 am
by Transcend
it's shadow/blitz/michel

everyone else is town gg

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:45 am
by Shadow_step
In post 848, JarJarDrinks wrote:that was a pretty fast catchup shadow. Anything else to add?
Festive season here, had to go out so quickly skimmed the thread.