Mafiascum.net

In post 170, Adelbert Steiner wrote:

In post 168, the worst wrote:@Albert are you an outed alt?

No. And I will not be outed.

A man is allowed his secrets.

Three can keep a secret if two of them are dead you know.

Actually only one. Which was Lovers.

Then the other was a hydra in lynchpin with Auro/Volxen/Me

In post 900, Reinhardt wrote:

In post 170, Adelbert Steiner wrote:

In post 168, the worst wrote:@Albert are you an outed alt?

No. And I will not be outed.

A man is allowed his secrets.

Three can keep a secret if two of them are dead you know.

<3

In post 180, Dunnstral wrote:The gentlemen who pairs with the lady with 8 coins can hammer a wagon by themself as the last vote before intermission

In post 196, Ankamius wrote:I'm kind of surprised it took this long for an Adel scumread to start appearing, the entrance to the game in of itself was scummy

So I don’t seem to have been alone in suspecting Adelbert’s entrance. So it seems interesting people are singling me out in such a manner. Is it because I’m so proper?

Oh my that wasn’t supposed to happen. I’m merely replying to the second item.

In post 206, Firebringer wrote:I want to point out that people are reading Alberts personality as scummy. None of his play has been indicative of anything so far. But I am so curious on who the player is.

I don’t think anyone has said this in fact?

In post 217, Allomancer wrote:

In post 215, Slaxx wrote:

In post 213, Allomancer wrote:Ank and Urist are null
Dunn is town

Why is Dunn town?

Good analysis, seems towny. Don't worry yourself, this is early on, reads can and will change.

Why the need for the caveat about reads changing? Did Slaxx seem concerned about your reads?

In post 218, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 175, the worst wrote:

In post 153, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.

Elements of this are probably fairly reasonable but literally the last time I saw him as scum he came out the gates swinging at a scumbuddy to manipulate the gamestate into a massive annoying 1v1

It was a scum motivated behaviour

he's actually pretending to have reasoning here but I don't think his reasoning is consistent with reality which is not directly analogous but I think it's very worth mentioning


Do you think it's fair to suggest that I've been posting the way he claimed and I'm scum because of it?

If you die he dies too

You're positing that this is scum motivated

IF YOU DIE, HE DIES TOO

If this is trying to imply what I think it is it’s wrong, and Dunnstral should probably be aware of that.

In post 901, Slaxx wrote:Actually only one. Which was Lovers.

Then the other was a hydra in lynchpin with Auro/Volxen/Me

you think this is about you lol

what do you expect, me to go [Slaxx is shit at playing scum!]

You have it backward; the point is that Dunn is really good at playing scum, and has also won this particular setup before (albeit without this coin nonsense)

Dunn is demonstrably a strong scum player and for that reason pairing a player that can be a consensus townread with him is dangerous. I was volunteering myself for Dunn precisely because I did not enter this game planning to be in a final pairing, and I doubt Dunn did either. Seemed like a good fit in that regard

Additionally, the point I was making was that you two should not pair right now. Given Celica JUST cased you, isn't there like, things to talk about right now? You're not even a consensus read at the moment so it's almost a non-issue, but you still shouldn't pair this early in the pre-dance.

In post 901, Slaxx wrote:Actually only one. Which was Lovers.

Then the other was a hydra in lynchpin with Auro/Volxen/Me

so lolwagons doesn't get any credit?

In post 795, the worst wrote:hi Clemency
are you town?

In post 799, the worst wrote:pinkie promise?

In post 815, the worst wrote:Even more than mine?

In post 832, the worst wrote:Ankamikazemius

answer my post pls allo

In post 908, Krazy wrote:

In post 901, Slaxx wrote:Actually only one. Which was Lovers.

Then the other was a hydra in lynchpin with Auro/Volxen/Me

you think this is about you lol

what do you expect, me to go [Slaxx is shit at playing scum!]

You have it backward; the point is that Dunn is really good at playing scum, and has also won this particular setup before (albeit without this coin nonsense)

Dunn is demonstrably a strong scum player and for that reason pairing a player that can be a consensus townread with him is dangerous. I was volunteering myself for Dunn precisely because I did not enter this game planning to be in a final pairing, and I doubt Dunn did either. Seemed like a good fit in that regard

Additionally, the point I was making was that you two should not pair right now. Given Celica JUST cased you, isn't there like, things to talk about right now? You're not even a consensus read at the moment so it's almost a non-issue, but you still shouldn't pair this early in the pre-dance.

We can talk about the case, sure.

It felt like you were claiming information on me you didn’t have, and when that happened, yes, it did become about me.

In post 908, Krazy wrote:

In post 901, Slaxx wrote:Actually only one. Which was Lovers.

Then the other was a hydra in lynchpin with Auro/Volxen/Me

you think this is about you lol

what do you expect, me to go [Slaxx is shit at playing scum!]

You have it backward; the point is that Dunn is really good at playing scum, and has also won this particular setup before (albeit without this coin nonsense)

Dunn is demonstrably a strong scum player and for that reason pairing a player that can be a consensus townread with him is dangerous. I was volunteering myself for Dunn precisely because I did not enter this game planning to be in a final pairing, and I doubt Dunn did either. Seemed like a good fit in that regard

Additionally, the point I was making was that you two should not pair right now. Given Celica JUST cased you, isn't there like, things to talk about right now? You're not even a consensus read at the moment so it's almost a non-issue, but you still shouldn't pair this early in the pre-dance.

I've also lost this particular setup before, as scum

In post 794, Firebringer wrote:I am happy u are here too clemency. you are a fun dude to play with

In post 797, Firebringer wrote:we all know clemency is third party

In post 802, Firebringer wrote:celica, i am still owed a compliment.

@Clemency yes

In post 817, Firebringer wrote:

In post 814, Celica wrote:

In post 802, Firebringer wrote:celica, i am still owed a compliment.

@Clemency yes

Your posting has made me smile the most out of everyone in this playerlist.

thank you <3

In post 896, Firebringer wrote:Krazy is a stalker confirmed

You're just as bad.

In post 909, Allomancer wrote:

In post 901, Slaxx wrote:Actually only one. Which was Lovers.

Then the other was a hydra in lynchpin with Auro/Volxen/Me

so lolwagons doesn't get any credit?

Nah I phased him out

I’m fucking with people on another alt don’t you worry

That's dumb. IIRC, lolwagons was the one who did most of the work.

let's be real, lolwagons is a stronger player than slaxx

Oh dear...

In post 913, Allomancer wrote:You're just as bad.

Thats not my point buddy. You said all I did was shit post while the worst was content posting. I am showing you are demonstrably inaccurate.

Please explain your read better because I am finding weak ground for you to say "Firebringer is just shit posting not trying to solve the game. the worst is content posting and not shit posting and is solving."

Go for it man.

In post 916, Krazy wrote:let's be real, lolwagons is a stronger player than slaxx

What does this accomplish?

And my point is that the worst has a much higher ratio of content:shit than you. The worst also puts far more effort into her content posts than you.

In post 903, Reinhardt wrote: So I don’t seem to have been alone in suspecting Adelbert’s entrance. So it seems interesting people are singling me out in such a manner. Is it because I’m so proper?

What does this mean?

In post 920, Allomancer wrote:And my point is that the worst has a much higher ratio of content:shit than you. The worst also puts far more effort into her content posts than you.

Okay content:shit ratio determines alignment and effort also means alignment.
If that is the basis of your read than okay.

Why do you think these two are relevant to either of us two when we are two different players?

crikey

In post 921, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 903, Reinhardt wrote: So I don’t seem to have been alone in suspecting Adelbert’s entrance. So it seems interesting people are singling me out in such a manner. Is it because I’m so proper?

What does this mean?

Translation: I wasn't the only one who though Adel's entrance was scummy, but everyone is giving me heat over it. That's weird.