Page 37 of 145

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:41 am
by Bins
In post 898, Errantparabola wrote:cold take bins
i can't wait to get wagoned so i can show them how to really AtE

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:41 am
by GuyInFreezer
In post 898, Errantparabola wrote:heres the thing: elsa alluded it to being some sort of reaction test?
Oh did she?

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:42 am
by Baezu
In post 862, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 855, xRECKONERx wrote:can yall read the fuckin op
RTFM is a remain of the past these days.
Heh

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:42 am
by GuyInFreezer
In post 738, Elsa Jay wrote:I was kinda hoping you wouldn't notice that, buddy.
She did!

@Elsa
What kind of reaction were you looking for with that?

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:43 am
by Bins
In post 899, Alchemist21 wrote:Even in her response to me she was like “does scum push me here or does scum” and and it felt like she was faking her indecisiveness.
you're entire read on me is that i'm faking reads and faking uncertainty but i'm like the most uncertain player on the face of the earth

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:43 am
by implosion
VOTE: Alchemist

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:43 am
by Baezu
Honestly, at least the thread is talking again. These last three pages will give town more info than the last 30 had so hurray for that!

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:45 am
by the worst
738 was a super bad post ya

I need to go do other things then work I'm sorry ): I'll be back later

VOTE: Elsa gamestate is too chaotic for me to spill the beans too hard rn but I'm getting kinda spooky vibes from Maria

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:45 am
by implosion
is it bad that every vote i've laid this game after zor was on a non-skittle?

probably. but what are YOU gonna do about it

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:45 am
by Alchemist21
And you’re trying way too hard to express that. Plus your uncertainty on Implosion didn’t match what you said about sheeping him. Why want to sheep him when you have stronger Townreads and then backtrack on that Implosion Townread? It doesn’t make sense really.

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:45 am
by implosion
why are yOU VOTING ELSA what the fuck dude what is happening

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:45 am
by the worst
In post 905, implosion wrote:VOTE: Alchemist
good vote!
VOTE: alchemist

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:46 am
by implosion
:')

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:46 am
by the worst
In post 910, implosion wrote:why are yOU VOTING ELSA what the fuck dude what is happening
738 and to add pressure to his reaction but I'd rather join something spicier but Australian mobile data op and I'm getting p-edited 20 seconds out on all of my posts >:c

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:47 am
by the worst
ok I'll be back later I hope you guys don't make me read 10 pages again I'm super unlikely to do it :(

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:48 am
by implosion
who is this incompetent mod that hasn't done a votecount on this page yet

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:48 am
by zoraster
haven't read everything yet, but for now

VOTE: SleepyKrew

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:51 am
by Bins
In post 909, Alchemist21 wrote:And you’re trying way too hard to express that. Plus your uncertainty on Implosion didn’t match what you said about sheeping him. Why want to sheep him when you have stronger Townreads and then backtrack on that Implosion Townread? It doesn’t make sense really.
you do realize i had a read on baezu independent of implosion, right

iirc at that time implosion wasnt even explaining the read on baezu that much (or if he did i didn't read it lol). i didnt mean it as a "im mindlessly sheeping!" (which youre being awfully semantic about), it was more of "im embarrassed i have to vote with implosion" (less srs). and also my townread on implosion is similar to my townread on errantparabola. even if it wasnt strong (at the time), i still respect their reads in case they are town. i mean, when you sheep ("sheep" being used loosely here) any wagon, you are trusting the people leading it. that's more of what i meant.

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:53 am
by Alchemist21
Eh, I can accept that part anyway. Still think your tone towards our slots is way off.

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:54 am
by Errantparabola
In post 845, xRECKONERx wrote:two shot doctor is a very specific thing to claim and also don't know why baezu-scum would come back and put the modifier on it after the fact and also lines up with how i know UT likes to design games bc ive designed a shitload with him and x-shots are in like every game

idk seems like a big coincidental lucky swing for scum to make in the claim dept
hm, i think this is pretty convincing. definitely not in the mood to see the wagon to its end. that being said i dont think it's actually particularly lucky
In post 849, Bins wrote:How about I was just shocked at the reaction? I was sitting on the bus like BIG YIKES and felt like it didn't seem warranted at all. Not only did no one claim intent, but Baezu just suddenly went from "Hey pals" to "FUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOU."
bins picking up on the exact same thing as me as usual
but: i do think that baezu was legitimately frustrated because of the reactions post-claim (perhaps she expected everyone to sort of mass unvote after her doctor claim but instead she got zito registering his disbelief)
In post 867, implosion wrote:
ernparbntablo wrote:okay pedit: what the fuck is going on rn?
refer to post for a comprehensive summary
vigs on this man right here
In post 874, xRECKONERx wrote:zito is coming at this in a similar way to how i am coming at this and it comes thru in his tone

i mean maybe it's easy to fake that "lol idk what's going on halp" tone but knowing zito's personality it seems to ring true for me and that's enough for DAY ONE until we have more to go on to build something more concrete
ok that's fair
i feel like ive been generally unable to follow where zito is trying to get at with his posting this game
BUT: it does warrant saying that i also feel this way about zito's posting in general sometimes
In post 901, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 898, Errantparabola wrote:heres the thing: elsa alluded it to being some sort of reaction test?
Oh did she?
someone went like "hey flavor was randomized" and elsa was like "SSH don't spoil it!!"
it was super weird
In post 738, Elsa Jay wrote:
In post 730, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 722, Elsa Jay wrote:Rainbow doesn't seem like a doctor. And she doesn't have the LOYAL Modifier as the Element of Loyalty? Fake news.
In post 3, Untrod Tripod wrote:Q: Is this game breakable by flavor?
A: No. Flavor and abilities were randomized.
I was kinda hoping you wouldn't notice that,
buddy.
In post 916, zoraster wrote:haven't read everything yet, but for now

VOTE: SleepyKrew
holy shit
this man
is trolling us

also my reads are all over the place, too much is happening right now for me to parse

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:56 am
by Bins
In post 919, Errantparabola wrote:but: i do think that baezu was legitimately frustrated because of the reactions post-claim (perhaps she expected everyone to sort of mass unvote after her doctor claim but instead she got zito registering his disbelief)
how dare you come in here with a sensible counter explanation

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:57 am
by Baezu
In post 888, Bins wrote:
In post 881, implosion wrote:the only like, material risk to leaving baezu alive is that she's a strong scum pr of some sort. but eh. w/e.
yeah, and i also don't think she'll get nk'd by scum if she is town doc so w/e
Why not?

And also if you were doc, I’d want to see how you’d react if people jumped down your throat calling you gale

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:58 am
by Errantparabola
someone tel me who to vote

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:59 am
by Untrod Tripod
Image

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:00 pm
by Untrod Tripod
Image