In post 901, Fuscosco wrote:But I havent played since I left 18 months or so ago.
Gonna find you then
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:53 am
by Fuscosco
please dont. i kind of like building a new meta
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:01 am
by mbaki
I do that too.
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:03 am
by OkaPoka
Overkill hasn't broken out of their standard of content whilst shadowless appears to have. I think there is higher scum equity with shadow than overkill
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:04 am
by RadiantCowbells
I just realized I have eight townreads
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:05 am
by OkaPoka
So chemist are you just going to not play until shadow plays?
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:09 am
by Chemist1422
In post 910, OkaPoka wrote:So chemist are you just going to not play until shadow plays?
In post 625, mbaki wrote:I thought Chennis was town; he was not on my original lynch list (separate statements). I just dislike his play/style. Honestly, I'm very disappointed at this playerlist, I was much happier with the first one. If I noticed how much it changed I probably would not have stayed in.
VOTE: Mbaki
idk if this is scum 8ball its still a good lynch for town
This is a wolfy perspective because I think scum are more likely to be focused on the 8-ball setup because it's more important for them to lynch it
We are lynching on this list today. No, not being here does not necessarily mean a town read. If you vote off this list I will be irritated.
Trying to control votes so early on despite not doing much themselves + no real reasoning at all.
In post 625, mbaki wrote:I thought Chennis was town; he was not on my original lynch list (separate statements). I just dislike his play/style. Honestly, I'm very disappointed at this playerlist, I was much happier with the first one. If I noticed how much it changed I probably would not have stayed in.
Like wolfy af, lynching someone because you dont agree with their playstyle is unneeded
In post 625, mbaki wrote:I thought Chennis was town; he was not on my original lynch list (separate statements). I just dislike his play/style. Honestly, I'm very disappointed at this playerlist, I was much happier with the first one. If I noticed how much it changed I probably would not have stayed in.
VOTE: Mbaki
idk if this is scum 8ball its still a good lynch for town
This is a wolfy perspective because I think scum are more likely to be focused on the 8-ball setup because it's more important for them to lynch it
We are lynching on this list today. No, not being here does not necessarily mean a town read. If you vote off this list I will be irritated.
Trying to control votes so early on despite not doing much themselves + no real reasoning at all.
In post 625, mbaki wrote:I thought Chennis was town; he was not on my original lynch list (separate statements). I just dislike his play/style. Honestly, I'm very disappointed at this playerlist, I was much happier with the first one. If I noticed how much it changed I probably would not have stayed in.
Like wolfy af, lynching someone because you dont agree with their playstyle is unneeded
I am not placing a vote. I will be voting by end of day, do not worry.
Disagree with Shadow read, and I dont see a reason not to vote
I don't like the vote for one post+case later thing at all tbh
Yeah I don't really like the slot, plus overall seems less aggressive than I've seen them lately.
Eh, I only really play agressivly when I have a larger WIM.
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 12:08 pm
by 0verki11
And yes I still maintain my Ches read, as I liked the posts I mentioned earlier and none of their posts particular feel scummy to me currently.
I feel like the LAMIST posts are NAI for them.
In post 625, mbaki wrote:I thought Chennis was town; he was not on my original lynch list (separate statements). I just dislike his play/style. Honestly, I'm very disappointed at this playerlist, I was much happier with the first one. If I noticed how much it changed I probably would not have stayed in.
VOTE: Mbaki
idk if this is scum 8ball its still a good lynch for town
This is a wolfy perspective because I think scum are more likely to be focused on the 8-ball setup because it's more important for them to lynch it
We are lynching on this list today. No, not being here does not necessarily mean a town read. If you vote off this list I will be irritated.
Trying to control votes so early on despite not doing much themselves + no real reasoning at all.
In post 625, mbaki wrote:I thought Chennis was town; he was not on my original lynch list (separate statements). I just dislike his play/style. Honestly, I'm very disappointed at this playerlist, I was much happier with the first one. If I noticed how much it changed I probably would not have stayed in.
Like wolfy af, lynching someone because you dont agree with their playstyle is unneeded
In post 625, mbaki wrote:I thought Chennis was town; he was not on my original lynch list (separate statements). I just dislike his play/style. Honestly, I'm very disappointed at this playerlist, I was much happier with the first one. If I noticed how much it changed I probably would not have stayed in.
VOTE: Mbaki
idk if this is scum 8ball its still a good lynch for town
This is a wolfy perspective because I think scum are more likely to be focused on the 8-ball setup because it's more important for them to lynch it
We are lynching on this list today. No, not being here does not necessarily mean a town read. If you vote off this list I will be irritated.
Trying to control votes so early on despite not doing much themselves + no real reasoning at all.
In post 625, mbaki wrote:I thought Chennis was town; he was not on my original lynch list (separate statements). I just dislike his play/style. Honestly, I'm very disappointed at this playerlist, I was much happier with the first one. If I noticed how much it changed I probably would not have stayed in.
Like wolfy af, lynching someone because you dont agree with their playstyle is unneeded
I am not placing a vote. I will be voting by end of day, do not worry.
Disagree with Shadow read, and I dont see a reason not to vote
I don't like the vote for one post+case later thing at all tbh
Yeah I don't really like the slot, plus overall seems less aggressive than I've seen them lately.
Eh, I only really play agressivly when I have a larger WIM.
That's the only thing you object to?
i mean the one post and then case thing is also trash and makes very little sense.
Can you explain it.
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 1:27 pm
by Reasonably Clever
In post 866, Fuscosco wrote:Cant go after every jerkhead who picks a bone with you.
I didn’t care for Chenn’s push on us either but at least his tone seems better.
The issue which is frustrating me because it continues to be ignored is that TD initially sr us, then tr us and insisted we couldn’t possibly be scum’s pick for 8 ball and when we called him out on his bs, he went right back to insisting we were scum. My point from the beginning has been, that their entire progression on us has been illogical and faked. TD just wants to push us for any damned reason they can pull put of their ass. basically.
In post 866, Fuscosco wrote:Cant go after every jerkhead who picks a bone with you.
I didn’t care for Chenn’s push on us either but at least his tone seems better.
The issue which is frustrating me because it continues to be ignored is that TD initially sr us, then tr us and insisted we couldn’t possibly be scum’s pick for 8 ball and when we called him out on his bs, he went right back to insisting we were scum. My point from the beginning has been, that their entire progression on us has been illogical and faked. TD just wants to push us for any damned reason they can pull put of their ass. basically.
In post 920, NanceFloor wrote:My point from the beginning has been, that their entire progression on us has been illogical and faked. TD just wants to push us for any damned reason they can pull put of their ass. basically.
~ND
Do you think theyre the best choice today? Who else would be acceptable? Could we cop them up tomorrow instead?
