Mafiascum.net

In post 897, Luca Blight wrote:Ame, don’t let my claim be in vain. Please let’s lynch Insomnia today.

In post 891, insomnia wrote:Well, yeah, i'm not going to lie, i've been sapped of will power because of the recent posting which is honestly obvious, like you can tell. But it's not that I'm not engaged, I just am sapped of any wim when my points keep getting discredited and people don't notice. I have a hard time actually countering this as well, whenever i come back and push my scum read, i get discredited and he's always here, calling me obvscum and cherrypicking everything, even going as far as checking my meta without actually reading anything I post in a game at all, nor looking at my post count. When I talk level of engagement I literally mean post count. I can fake being engaged if i want to, but this is honestly a bad argument to even consider in the context of this game, because i am mentally tired of having to point out to what I perceive as obvious and i just get countered on semantics and trivial stuff.

and i have to deal with nobody listening to me and everyone suggesting i work with my scum read which is just dumb.

and i already posted about your second link thing with aaron's progression. he didn't react poorly to pressure, aaron had a progression on luca and was baffled by his asinine claim, which was the fact that he would've changed his game style radically within 1 game experience apart. which is just mind boggling, it's diametrically opposite, i have proven it's diametrically opposite. especially, aaron raised a good point about luca saying he would've gained experienced after a scum game in which he...slipped and died day one? what?

In post 902, insomnia wrote:no it doesn't, it just proves I read you correctly and was genuinely scum hunting. so here goes your lack of engagement argument, what do you know

In post 905, Luca Blight wrote:but if Insomnia was lynched I’d be conftown anyway.

In post 904, Ame wrote:

In post 891, insomnia wrote:Well, yeah, i'm not going to lie, i've been sapped of will power because of the recent posting which is honestly obvious, like you can tell. But it's not that I'm not engaged, I just am sapped of any wim when my points keep getting discredited and people don't notice. I have a hard time actually countering this as well, whenever i come back and push my scum read, i get discredited and he's always here, calling me obvscum and cherrypicking everything, even going as far as checking my meta without actually reading anything I post in a game at all, nor looking at my post count. When I talk level of engagement I literally mean post count. I can fake being engaged if i want to, but this is honestly a bad argument to even consider in the context of this game, because i am mentally tired of having to point out to what I perceive as obvious and i just get countered on semantics and trivial stuff.

and i have to deal with nobody listening to me and everyone suggesting i work with my scum read which is just dumb.

and i already posted about your second link thing with aaron's progression. he didn't react poorly to pressure, aaron had a progression on luca and was baffled by his asinine claim, which was the fact that he would've changed his game style radically within 1 game experience apart. which is just mind boggling, it's diametrically opposite, i have proven it's diametrically opposite. especially, aaron raised a good point about luca saying he would've gained experienced after a scum game in which he...slipped and died day one? what?

-What about my Wimpy progression was unfakeable?
-In the first link, you stated that you had not read Luca v Aaron. But you were scumreading Luca for misreading Aaron. How could you know that Luca's reasoning was bad if you didn't even read their diologue?
-The point Luca was making in the second link was about deflection not falling under pressure. Aaron reacted similarly in MN2115. It doesn't influence your perspective on Aaron?

In post 909, Luca Blight wrote:Lol, you’re the complete buffoon for your utterly blatant lies about my Frost argument. If you’re Town you’re an even bigger buffoon, but I sincerely doubt that’s the case.

In post 912, insomnia wrote:

In post 909, Luca Blight wrote:Lol, you’re the complete buffoon for your utterly blatant lies about my Frost argument. If you’re Town you’re an even bigger buffoon, but I sincerely doubt that’s the case.

you're the avatar of town's defeat, claiming masons d1 and pushing a mislynch on a person that can be BoP'd and can have a huge impact on town cohesion and direction.

you're doing it wrong.

In post 913, Luca Blight wrote:Frost SR me before I pushed him? Where?

In post 915, Luca Blight wrote:I thought you didn’t buy my claim btw?

In post 918, insomnia wrote:Your whole push on me was more about "who has a bigger dick" contest rather than actually pushing a scum read. you are misplacing confidence in bad points because you're confbiased and you'll look like a complete buffoon and earn your title as the avatar of town's defeat.