Mafiascum.net

I was going to post "They are here to troll the game" to ruin their intro, but i thought of it too late.

[youtube]ZvMsp7s78Do[/youube]

A lot of quiet’s early posts seem non-committal and don’t really say much. I’m rather intrigued by the slot. Like they’re claiming to be somewhat of a newbie so give them some room, but the posts actually seem well thought out. Except for the fact that... there’s barely any fire to them.

I’ll give an example. 598 is analyzing a post by Luca that well, was harshly criticizing Mini for not really contributing anything useful. But quiet is interpreting it as a legitimate argument. It’s a strange take. And this question about whether Scum ever produce filler content? Of course they do! Everybody does. It’s not AI actually unless you start seeing a lot of filler as a means of distraction.

I don’t know, I’ll keep reading.

etymonline.org wrote:

re-

word-forming element meaning "back to the original place; again, anew, once more," also with a sense of "undoing," c. 1200, from Old French and directly from Latin

re-

"again, back, anew, against," "Latin combining form conceivably from Indo-European

*wret-

, metathetical variant of

*wert-

"to turn" [Watkins]. Often merely intensive, and in many of the older borrowings from French and Latin the precise sense of

re-

is lost in secondary senses or weakened beyond recognition. OED writes that it is "impossible to attempt a complete record of all the forms resulting from its use," and adds that "The number of these is practically infinite ...." The Latin prefix became

red-

before vowels and

h-

, as in

redact

,

redeem

,

redolent

,

redundant

.

Official Votecount 1.10

Not_Mafia (6): Gamma Emerald, NorwegianboyEE, quiet, Nero Cain, Norfolk Boy1, Rannygazoo

[E-5]

PlusJOYED (5): Luca Blight, DrippingGoofball, Titus, Andresvmb, Bypasser Catcher
MiniMegabyte (2): BBMolla, Vaxkiller
Titus (1): PlusJOYED
DrippingGoofball (1): MiniMegabyte
NorwegianboyEE (1): Not_Mafia
Andresvmb (1): Momrangal

Not Voting (3): Hayker*, Binatog13, chkflip

*

Hayker may be voting BBMolla, waiting on confirmation that is what they meant.

With 20 players alive, it takes 11 votes to achieve an elimination.

Day 1 will end in (expired on 2021-01-16 23:15:00).

Can you please not.

Koba you’re not even in the game what the hell hahahaha

Plz no

Where did DK come from

In post 892, Momrangal wrote:Did you miss the entire catch up wall within the spoiler or something?

Have you not seen me rail incessantly about exactly that post? What?

In post 908, Momrangal wrote:Where did DK come from

Dkkoba alt slipping.

@Mizzy
Can you please clean up those spamposts and give a warning to both players.

In post 910, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 908, Momrangal wrote:Where did DK come from

Dkkoba alt slipping.

@Mizzy
Can you please clean up those spamposts and give a warning to both players.

In post 629, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 622, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 618, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 529, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game needs an actual good push to get some good discussion going.

I've actually found this game to be quite refreshing so far, with decent discussion with minimal shit posting. Do you just not like any of the current wagons?

Actually i like this.
Competing wagons between Cheeky/Mini makes the game much easier for me to read in terms of finding scum.

Possibly more, because would scum really bus at this point?

Haha! I have a game for you...

In post 875, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 825, Bypasser Catcher wrote:i have a daycop guilty on mini

I really hate that Mini’s catch up post with all my heart. But I’m starting to think that Mini is just Town that won’t help solve the game. They want to get to motivation but don’t really know how but ask why multiple times at one point for example, and just seem very defensive.

@Mini what do you think of my slot? Maybe this helps me sort you better.

This one did run away from me, but like I still don't understand how you can get such an impression when Mini isn't even talking about people on his wagon, save for his vote on norwee

In post 912, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 629, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 622, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 618, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 529, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game needs an actual good push to get some good discussion going.

I've actually found this game to be quite refreshing so far, with decent discussion with minimal shit posting. Do you just not like any of the current wagons?

Actually i like this.
Competing wagons between Cheeky/Mini makes the game much easier for me to read in terms of finding scum.

Possibly more, because would scum really bus at this point?

Haha! I have a game for you...

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12285030 ?

In post 894, Not_Mafia wrote:

S

U

P

C

L

O

D

P

O

L

E

S

,

I

'

M

T

H

E

J

E

S

T

E

R

A

N

D

I

'

M

H

E

R

E

T

O

T

R

O

L

L

T

H

E

F

E

C

A

L

M

A

T

T

E

R

O

U

T

O

F

T

H

I

S

G

A

M

E

!

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

Oh no.

In post 125, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 88, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 38, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 34, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm aware of the fallacy but from an emotional standpoint there's still some validity there I think. I'm not saying hes scum butonestly I will look for any excuse to bypass Rvs.

Don’t worry I had a feeling that you were really just trying to push me in some sort of way to get a reaction and see if you can figure out my alignment from that. Unfortunately it just won’t be that easy. I’ll try and make it obvious to you this is still my Town self though.

Idk bro your vibe’s kind of off
VOTE: Andres

I agree with this.
It seems like an overly quick conclusion for such an dubious claim to believe it and nit only that but call it: "the towniest miller claim"
Not the strongest case but i like it as my first wagon.
VOTE: Andresvmb

In post 327, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It’s also somewhat towny how Ranny calls out and votes someone that called them town.
Screw it.
VOTE: DrippingGoofball

Norwee, I think it’s weird that I’m not higher in your townreads considering that you were sheeping me for a bit.

(None of these were captured in the vote counts. Nice going.)

Wait, Not_Mafia always votes themselves on joining a game.
Ergo, Norwegianboy is Not_Mafia

ergo, not mafia and norwegianboy are the same person and thus multiaccounting.

(/s based on not_mafia meta obviously moderinos no bannerino)

Hey Ranny, what do you think about two slots going hard about the fact that they are newbs this gsme

In post 917, Rannygazoo wrote: Norwee, I think it’s weird that I’m not higher in your townreads considering that you were sheeping me for a bit.

I just didn't like your push on Norfolk Boy. But you're more null than scummy to me.

you and your Nor this and Nor that how about you XOR out of here huh

In post 921, Bypasser Catcher wrote:you and your Nor this and Nor that how about you XOR out of here huh

What?

discrete math joke

In post 919, Momrangal wrote:Hey Ranny, what do you think about two slots going hard about the fact that they are newbs this gsme

Uh, I feel like I’ve already addressed them individually? I caught some flak for the pressure vote on Binatog, but people are coming around to the idea that the slot might not be acting in good faith, and my pressure didn’t really change anything. I’d be willing to elim if it went that way.

As for quiet, I thought his request for citations in triplicate was an attempt to slow down the wagon on mini or cheeky, or at the very least, have an excuse for not joining them. It’s not actually going to stop anyone, though. Null on this slot for now.