Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 3:48 am
V/LA until Thursday night
Our first game. You repped out for whatever reason. You pinged me and your replacement solidified it.In post 894, Rebel Radio wrote:I'm trying to not be as aggressive as I used to be in games - this is a new playstyle I'm trying. Regardless no matter how smart you think you are, you're not going to catch me based on my personality because I play the same between alignments in that regard. I don't remember you ever catching me as scum as I don't think I have rolled scum against you.
You are sorted. Show me where and how I am discrediting you.In post 894, Rebel Radio wrote: You're just cementing my belief that you are uninterested in trying to sort me and are keen on discrediting me / painting me as scum.
Then counter what I'm saying instead of asking for quotes and not responding.In post 894, Rebel Radio wrote: And I'm not disputing anything you're saying? I'd say that trying to pull more reasoning out of you is quite the opposite.
You've told me I'm wrong, you've given me no reason why other than "I'm town"[sic]In post 894, Rebel Radio wrote:I'm not scum - so you think I'm gonna just nod my head and be like "yup thats correct" instead of tell you you're flat out wrong on your points?
I have elaborated, what more do you want for a D1? You're info farming and withholding information.In post 894, Rebel Radio wrote:I'm trying to get you to elaborate and you're just giving these vague nothings that are NAI for me. Of course I'm going to dismiss your points when they aren't really points against me. Try harder.
I counter this with:In post 894, Rebel Radio wrote: And I never mentioned you having townreads. I said you don't have many reads at all here - and acknowledged that point was moreso not as relevant.
Emphasis mine.Rebel Radio wrote:Flea, when you're town your reads actually have substance, which here it's blatant you don't and, similarly to raya, are tunneled in on me and are unable to comment on others(while that specific trait is something you are able to avoid when scum though.)
Take your bad faith argument with lubricant and place it firmly where the sun does not shine.In post 894, Rebel Radio wrote: How about you try engaging me in good faith if you're town? Or are you feeling trapped into tunneling me because you are indeed scum?
-koba
In post 895, Raya36 wrote:I already did explain why I think you're mafia though. And I also think Flea has a good point too.In post 878, Rebel Radio wrote:preferred wagon bc I fos you raya you can't even explain why I'm mafia. You did this last game too
-koba
What are your reads?In post 897, Raya36 wrote:What? I'm aware of others?In post 882, Rebel Radio wrote:raya is tunneled in on only my slot because as scum they need to not be aware of others in the gamestate, something they were guilty of as scum in a previous game with both of us.
-koba
In post 857, Flea The Magician wrote:In post 427, Rebel Radio wrote:withholding rnIn post 426, Flea The Magician wrote:Humour me Koba, are you actually willing to go into deep behaviour analysis to root out fakeclaims?
If you are, then whats your opinion on my behaviour so far?
-kobaYou're making this a little easy on me koba.In post 431, Rebel Radio wrote:Both withholding!
Yes. Because this is a WIFOM Mr Meeseeks Box.In post 907, Rebel Radio wrote:Do you think scum!koba unvotes hayker here to keep the day going with me as the 2nd largest wagon(granted not by a lot) - this is just simple occam's razor, I'm actively diffusing a wagon in order to get better reads on everyone because there will be blood likely tonight in the slots that are threats to the various scum factions. So I feel an imperative to get as much info on the table as we can on d1.
-koba
keep the humility going since u misread me last game bc I townread u here again and im not going thru that again pleaseIn post 911, unwnd wrote:I am willing to believe Rebel's change in tone is not exclusive to their alignment and will instead be judging them on their intentions
Given this is directly relevant to my considerations of your thoughts behind a massclaim, this is relevant now.In post 909, Rebel Radio wrote:That's one thing, and easily explained that I don't want you to adjust your behavior/claim based on what I am saying. I will explain in the future if it does become relevant and we have claims. Anything else?
-koba
we aren't massclaiming right now.In post 914, Flea The Magician wrote:Given this is directly relevant to my considerations of your thoughts behind a massclaim, this is relevant now.In post 909, Rebel Radio wrote:That's one thing, and easily explained that I don't want you to adjust your behavior/claim based on what I am saying. I will explain in the future if it does become relevant and we have claims. Anything else?
-koba
Are you willing to do deep behaviour analysis of every player in this game as a result of a massclaim happening, which not only gives scum full setup information and a target list, but has zero pro-town benefits aside from finding 1 scum.
It's WIFOM, koba, it doesn't make you scum but it doesn't make you not scum.In post 912, Rebel Radio wrote:Like if you think that thats some smoking gun that makes me scum, then it must make the whole table scum with that level of standards for scumreading someone.
-koba
Deflection - there was never going to be enough support for a massclaim anyway but the motivations and things said by you in support of it still need to be analysed.In post 916, Rebel Radio wrote:we aren't massclaiming right now.In post 914, Flea The Magician wrote:Given this is directly relevant to my considerations of your thoughts behind a massclaim, this is relevant now.In post 909, Rebel Radio wrote:That's one thing, and easily explained that I don't want you to adjust your behavior/claim based on what I am saying. I will explain in the future if it does become relevant and we have claims. Anything else?
-koba
Are you willing to do deep behaviour analysis of every player in this game as a result of a massclaim happening, which not only gives scum full setup information and a target list, but has zero pro-town benefits aside from finding 1 scum.
drop it.
-koba
This stands as you're still withholding read information based on it.Flea The Magician wrote: Are you willing to do deep behaviour analysis of every player in this game as a result of a massclaim happening, which not only gives scum full setup information and a target list, but has zero pro-town benefits aside from finding 1 scum.
But you're convinced I"m scum based off that since you cited it. What else is there then?In post 917, Flea The Magician wrote:It's WIFOM, koba, it doesn't make you scum but it doesn't make you not scum.In post 912, Rebel Radio wrote:Like if you think that thats some smoking gun that makes me scum, then it must make the whole table scum with that level of standards for scumreading someone.
-koba
Gods above and I'm the one mid BPD episode rn...