Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2021 4:01 am
vote count 1.11
with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-09-03 17:20:00).
^ This is true. He was having fun and doing his own thing when he was town in this game. https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12932079In post 896, Enchant wrote:This is Town Thor.
As scum he suddenly turned passive and boring in our game.
I don't believe he would act differently if he is scum from start.
My original mention of the counterwagon referred to the one on Enchant. At the time he posted, in the same page, there were multiple votes on Enchant, so it was a little odd that he popped in with a Manatee vote without mention of Enchant, the counterwagon.In post 877, Flea The Magician wrote:Meanwhile I can fully agree with house after the gamma spat, using ongoing is a dirty tactic because frankly we can go look for games and it brings OGI into this game. I don't see what the counterwagon has to do with this?
TLDR: Laziness and cruising along.
I see you respond only when prompted. I don't see you following up which is my main beef. You're asking questions, and seemingly doing nothing. It's looking busy while doing nothing.
You're goddamn right I am! Hell yeah!House wrote: I guess you're town!
Literally typed "What would it cost me to have you vote somewhere, Something_Smart" and deleted itPenguinPower wrote:Would be cool to see s_s have a vote somewhere....very cool
Odd jump but indulge me.In post 888, Thor Ragnarok wrote:This is my playstyleIn post 884, Flea The Magician wrote:Happy to join you on a Thor train.In post 870, Titus wrote:Enchant + Thor is a great place to start.
Actually, not a terrible take.In post 896, Enchant wrote:This is Town Thor.
As scum he suddenly turned passive and boring in our game.
I don't believe he would act differently if he is scum from start.
You're town!In post 900, Datisi wrote:boop?
Wait what does your role and what you wanted have anything to do with this, like, offhandedly bringing this up?In post 899, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm starting to lean that way.In post 885, Something_Smart wrote:Do you think it's scummy?In post 880, Flea The Magician wrote:OK this is absolutely busywork and some weird ass BS.
I love mech spec, and if you look at the style of games I play I tend to go for mech heavy or bastard games. Looking at the games I've run (all 2 of them - still need an outside reviewer for the second) you can see I love mech weirdness.
If you want me to get down and dirty in the mech here, I can and I will, but the conclsion is always going to be the same. The human element alone here is enough to throw the spec out of the window.
I can tell you what my options were that I was going to choose from, and few people will actually believe me because of how I approach these games.
I was looking at PGO, Vengeful and Universial Backup. I'm not going to say what I actually selected but I was looking at those as I sent my number in.
I'll go back and have a look at that, and I may not know who you are but I fully know you have the capability to create content and generate it where needed.In post 904, Harvey and Haley wrote:My original mention of the counterwagon referred to the one on Enchant. At the time he posted, in the same page, there were multiple votes on Enchant, so it was a little odd that he popped in with a Manatee vote without mention of Enchant, the counterwagon.In post 877, Flea The Magician wrote:Meanwhile I can fully agree with house after the gamma spat, using ongoing is a dirty tactic because frankly we can go look for games and it brings OGI into this game. I don't see what the counterwagon has to do with this?
TLDR: Laziness and cruising along.
I see you respond only when prompted. I don't see you following up which is my main beef. You're asking questions, and seemingly doing nothing. It's looking busy while doing nothing.
In most cases where I don't visibly act on responses to me, it's because there's no game-progressing reason to. Again, if you think I'm asking empty questions - shoot me specifics and what kind of follow-up you'd expect with them.
-Harvey
I don't believe you believe that.
There is usually not much of a downside to voting, aside from outside quickhammer chances and people assuming the vote indicates a scumread and asking me to justify it.In post 904, Harvey and Haley wrote:Literally typed "What would it cost me to have you vote somewhere, Something_Smart" and deleted it
I agree the information gain is little, but your vote would play a part in speeding up the game via pressure - no?In post 915, Something_Smart wrote:Usually the reasons are something something wagon analysis something accountability but I've never seen anyone draw any productive information out of a vote that I placed on request.
that is very surface levelIn post 764, ManateeGal wrote:not really!! i was just skimming their iso and i was like "i like the amount of question marks in here"In post 761, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Is there a particular line of questioning you liked?
What’s your read on me?In post 918, Something_Smart wrote:You can read me 100% by checking your scum PT and seeing that I am not listed there
In post 872, House wrote:That shit was setup spec.In post 868, Something_Smart wrote:Did it not bother you the first four times he did that?
I'm less than clueless about setup spec in this game.
Activity theorizing, however, I'm very familiar with. I'm a spammy motherfucker as either alignment and have always been that way, so it's something i see a lot of discussion about.
Bee, being spammy with no content is suggestive of scum. We don't need an ironclad case D1 just >rand scum.In post 891, Bee wrote::/
I think voting Thor is a bad idea unless someone has a case other than busywork/not normal content. Like, is the information being put forward actually being used maliciously or anything?
Moderate scum off of draft position + your posts have done nothing to reverse it.In post 921, Bee wrote:What’s your read on me?