Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:53 am
Incorrect
Incorrect
I told notty when I saw that today's coin was contingent on not exceeding 150 posts that scum would use this as an excuse to not post and coast for much of the day. Wisdom mentioning "saving his posts" early on fit this mold but I decided to let it play out as I know he generally has a high post count in games.In post 898, Pavowski wrote:Case it so I can sheep it
nah
I'm doing the same thing though in a way. Why no push on us?In post 901, Bowser Jr. wrote:I told notty when I saw that today's coin was contingent on not exceeding 150 posts that scum would use this as an excuse to not post and coast for much of the day. Wisdom mentioning "saving his posts" early on fit this mold but I decided to let it play out as I know he generally has a high post count in games.In post 898, Pavowski wrote:Case it so I can sheep it
Now that we're close to deadline, what exactly was he saving his posts for?
~Spiffy
In post 885, Bowser Jr. wrote:VOTE: DV
Thinking some. Will be back later.
Might revote wheme.
@wheme- towns who confirm overnight to one person are called friendly neighbors. Also just a weird thing to have as a fakeclaim.
This is an intriguing progression.In post 899, Bowser Jr. wrote:Juliet why did you care so much about my DV read explanation? It seems like you used my not answering your question as a reason to complain about people ignoring you but you also haven't done anything with my response?
~Spiffy
What is intriguing about it?In post 911, DeasVail wrote:This is an intriguing progression.
--
Also is there a reason why some people seem desperate for a non-Juliet option?
Idgi
In post 885, Bowser Jr. wrote:VOTE: DV
Thinking some. Will be back later.
Might revote wheme.
@wheme- towns who confirm overnight to one person are called friendly neighbors. Also just a weird thing to have as a fakeclaim.
In post 909, Off The Hook wrote:nah
btw I'm gonna UNVOTE: , could maybe vote JC but she's closer to null rn than scum (but I think she is in that nullscum range)
-GE
In post 771, Icebox wrote:I don't like this mentality. But on the otherhand, who cares what I like and don't like.In post 768, Lukewarm wrote:I think I am good with either a JC or a wheme elim, and just people who are off both wagons should pick a side so we can see where the chip fall.
-Bell
These questions don't seem like questions intended to better your read of me. They just seem like questions.In post 915, Bowser Jr. wrote:What is intriguing about it?In post 911, DeasVail wrote:This is an intriguing progression.
--
Also is there a reason why some people seem desperate for a non-Juliet option?
Idgi
And name names, who do you see as "desperate" for a non-Juliet option?
~Spiffy
that's not scum-indicative for me, I'm gonna stop ya right thereIn post 917, DeasVail wrote:OTHIn post 909, Off The Hook wrote:nah
btw I'm gonna UNVOTE: , could maybe vote JC but she's closer to null rn than scum (but I think she is in that nullscum range)
-GE