Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 2:04 am
ico, i'd like some shotgun reads when you catch up, aight?
i don't recall you doing that as townIn post 899, Datisi wrote:i take that approach as scum
mostly because i take it as town and have to fake it as scum
soooooo
this i can doIn post 900, Datisi wrote:ico, i'd like some shotgun reads when you catch up, aight?
Oh well this should be entertaining.
In post 873, Iconeum wrote:it's a very shallow and general binning of like 4? players?
SirC's been pushing and seeking support for his pushes - i like his general thread presence
I don't mind pushing Dunn together with you and going from thereIn post 907, VP Baltar wrote:I've skimmed. I'll put up detailed responses in a bit.
Gamma having a one sided conversation with me while I was gone and taking pot shots doesn't look great.
Also, the pressure dissipating on Gamma and Dunn as soon as I was away looks suspicious. Shenanigans are afoot.
Uh that's pretty likely to backfire on me, no? If dats eventually comes to the conclusion you're town, wont he be sus of me for this whole thing?In post 879, Iconeum wrote:Fun and Games' scumread on me feels really weak. They are pushing Datisi as associative with me because they know i'm yeetbait and the *one* thing standing in their way for easy achievement of that is Datisi townreading me
So this could literally be scum!Fun and Games (damn that name, i tried abreviating that) pushing town!tisi into some sort of corner with regards to my slot, trying to 1) make sure there's no town!tisi defending me and 2) stopping potential town cohesion from forming
You can have whatever read you want on me. I think it is illogical to put me in a scumpile with dunn/Gamma.In post 908, Iconeum wrote:do you think i should be townreading you, vp?
He's good at reading you, and you're a slot that i'm concerned about, so:In post 887, Iconeum wrote:ofcourse you would, but i feel you would be less pushy about itIn post 883, Fun and Games wrote:so you are saying town!me would not try to get Datisi to take a stance on you because ?In post 881, Iconeum wrote:and the way you seem to be forcing Datisi in taking a stance on me feels off as well. you know that he's capable of reading me, yet you keep forcing the issue
i dont see a benefit in forcing the matter for town!you
So Fun and Games is equally bad with their readslist because they have me as scum *with* Dunn, whom I want yeeted today?In post 913, VP Baltar wrote:You can have whatever read you want on me. I think it is illogical to put me in a scumpile with dunn/Gamma.In post 908, Iconeum wrote:do you think i should be townreading you, vp?
Those theories of the game are in direct conflict with each other. Or at least they would appear to be if i was in your shoes.
Seems a bit contrived.
I'm also scumreading 2/3 of the other names in this list ...
Datisi might come to townread me anyway, so I don't see why you wouldn't try and force the matter now. Especially with him townreading you, there's no real downside I think.In post 911, Fun and Games wrote:Uh that's pretty likely to backfire on me, no? If dats eventually comes to the conclusion you're town, wont he be sus of me for this whole thing?In post 879, Iconeum wrote:Fun and Games' scumread on me feels really weak. They are pushing Datisi as associative with me because they know i'm yeetbait and the *one* thing standing in their way for easy achievement of that is Datisi townreading me
So this could literally be scum!Fun and Games (damn that name, i tried abreviating that) pushing town!tisi into some sort of corner with regards to my slot, trying to 1) make sure there's no town!tisi defending me and 2) stopping potential town cohesion from forming
~ skitter
why? is that? scummy?In post 909, Iconeum wrote:You are literally null because i've been liking posts and yet there's this thing with the little 1v1 we had with the whole read on me thing
because it feels manipulative, town!you doesn't need a solid read on me on day 1, and scum!you can use the easy misyeetIn post 920, Fun and Games wrote:Ok why is that more likely to come from scum-me truing to misflip you vs town-me wanting to get a better read on you ?
Ok work now later
~ skitter
I haven't looked for associatives between you and Dunn yet. I will say that F&G hasn't struck me as super suspicious to this point. I saw you were making some kind of case against them in the last few pages. I'll give that a careful look when I do a detailed catchup post in a few hours.In post 916, Iconeum wrote:So Fun and Games is equally bad with their readslist because they have me as scum *with* Dunn, whom I want yeeted today?In post 913, VP Baltar wrote:You can have whatever read you want on me. I think it is illogical to put me in a scumpile with dunn/Gamma.In post 908, Iconeum wrote:do you think i should be townreading you, vp?
Those theories of the game are in direct conflict with each other. Or at least they would appear to be if i was in your shoes.
Seems a bit contrived.