Page 37 of 147

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 2:04 am
by Datisi
ico, i'd like some shotgun reads when you catch up, aight?

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:01 am
by Iconeum
In post 899, Datisi wrote:i take that approach as scum

mostly because i take it as town and have to fake it as scum

soooooo
i don't recall you doing that as town

*shrug*

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:08 am
by Iconeum
In post 900, Datisi wrote:ico, i'd like some shotgun reads when you catch up, aight?
this i can do

Townie

A50 prob town, really reading like his previous game recently
SirC
Bingle

Varying degrees of nullishness

Datisi
Not_Maf
SA
Enchant

Scummy

Dunn
GE
VP
Fun and Games

Probably not all players in the game, i'd actually need to look up the playerlist

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:11 am
by Datisi
In post 902, Iconeum wrote:SirC
Bingle
explain these two?

also why am i nullish?

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:17 am
by VP Baltar
Opens game after day and a half gone:
In post 902, Iconeum wrote:Scummy
Dunn
GE
VP
Fun and Games
Oh well this should be entertaining.

It'll take me a minute to catch up this morning because I have some work to finish, but I can't wait to see how me and my scum reads are teammates.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:23 am
by Iconeum
it's not a team read

they're literally shotgun reads

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:25 am
by VP Baltar
In post 873, Iconeum wrote:it's a very shallow and general binning of like 4? players?

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:28 am
by VP Baltar
I've skimmed. I'll put up detailed responses in a bit.

Gamma having a one sided conversation with me while I was gone and taking pot shots doesn't look great.

Also, the pressure dissipating on Gamma and Dunn as soon as I was away looks suspicious. Shenanigans are afoot.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:31 am
by Iconeum
do you think i should be townreading you, vp?

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:34 am
by Iconeum
In post 903, Datisi wrote:
In post 902, Iconeum wrote:SirC
Bingle
explain these two?

also why am i nullish?
SirC's been pushing and seeking support for his pushes - i like his general thread presence
I don't really know why i put Bingle up there. I like it when i'm reading his posts. there was some mech talk which I for some reason Always townread even tho i know that's bad

You are literally null because i've been liking posts and yet there's this thing with the little 1v1 we had with the whole read on me thing

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:35 am
by Iconeum
In post 907, VP Baltar wrote:I've skimmed. I'll put up detailed responses in a bit.

Gamma having a one sided conversation with me while I was gone and taking pot shots doesn't look great.

Also, the pressure dissipating on Gamma and Dunn as soon as I was away looks suspicious. Shenanigans are afoot.
I don't mind pushing Dunn together with you and going from there ;)

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:35 am
by Fun and Games
In post 879, Iconeum wrote:Fun and Games' scumread on me feels really weak. They are pushing Datisi as associative with me because they know i'm yeetbait and the *one* thing standing in their way for easy achievement of that is Datisi townreading me

So this could literally be scum!Fun and Games (damn that name, i tried abreviating that) pushing town!tisi into some sort of corner with regards to my slot, trying to 1) make sure there's no town!tisi defending me and 2) stopping potential town cohesion from forming
Uh that's pretty likely to backfire on me, no? If dats eventually comes to the conclusion you're town, wont he be sus of me for this whole thing?
~ skitter

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:36 am
by Iconeum
Dunn is still a solid yeet for today imo

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:36 am
by VP Baltar
In post 908, Iconeum wrote:do you think i should be townreading you, vp?
You can have whatever read you want on me. I think it is illogical to put me in a scumpile with dunn/Gamma.

Those theories of the game are in direct conflict with each other. Or at least they would appear to be if i was in your shoes.

Seems a bit contrived.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:36 am
by Fun and Games
In post 887, Iconeum wrote:
In post 883, Fun and Games wrote:
In post 881, Iconeum wrote:and the way you seem to be forcing Datisi in taking a stance on me feels off as well. you know that he's capable of reading me, yet you keep forcing the issue
so you are saying town!me would not try to get Datisi to take a stance on you because ?
ofcourse you would, but i feel you would be less pushy about it
i dont see a benefit in forcing the matter for town!you
He's good at reading you, and you're a slot that i'm concerned about, so:
- i wanted to hear his opinion
- its worrying when *he* wasnt worried

~ skitter

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:37 am
by Iconeum
His follow up where he unvotes Gamma, one of his 2 suspects and then completely neglects Fun and Games without really doing anything else

yeah

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:37 am
by Iconeum
In post 913, VP Baltar wrote:
In post 908, Iconeum wrote:do you think i should be townreading you, vp?
You can have whatever read you want on me. I think it is illogical to put me in a scumpile with dunn/Gamma.

Those theories of the game are in direct conflict with each other. Or at least they would appear to be if i was in your shoes.

Seems a bit contrived.
So Fun and Games is equally bad with their readslist because they have me as scum *with* Dunn, whom I want yeeted today?

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:38 am
by Fun and Games
In post 902, Iconeum wrote:Scummy
Dunn
GE
VP
Fun and Games
I'm also scumreading 2/3 of the other names in this list ...

And vp iirc was as well

~ skitter

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:39 am
by Iconeum
In post 911, Fun and Games wrote:
In post 879, Iconeum wrote:Fun and Games' scumread on me feels really weak. They are pushing Datisi as associative with me because they know i'm yeetbait and the *one* thing standing in their way for easy achievement of that is Datisi townreading me

So this could literally be scum!Fun and Games (damn that name, i tried abreviating that) pushing town!tisi into some sort of corner with regards to my slot, trying to 1) make sure there's no town!tisi defending me and 2) stopping potential town cohesion from forming
Uh that's pretty likely to backfire on me, no? If dats eventually comes to the conclusion you're town, wont he be sus of me for this whole thing?
~ skitter
Datisi might come to townread me anyway, so I don't see why you wouldn't try and force the matter now. Especially with him townreading you, there's no real downside I think.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:39 am
by Fun and Games
I want to see a vc but probably voting ico

~ skitter

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:40 am
by Fun and Games
Ok why is that more likely to come from scum-me truing to misflip you vs town-me wanting to get a better read on you ?

Ok work now later

~ skitter

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:41 am
by Iconeum
there's 0 or maybe 1 vote on me I think

so you can just go ahead and vote me

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:41 am
by Datisi
In post 909, Iconeum wrote:You are literally null because i've been liking posts and yet there's this thing with the little 1v1 we had with the whole read on me thing
why? is that? scummy?

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:42 am
by Iconeum
In post 920, Fun and Games wrote:Ok why is that more likely to come from scum-me truing to misflip you vs town-me wanting to get a better read on you ?

Ok work now later

~ skitter
because it feels manipulative, town!you doesn't need a solid read on me on day 1, and scum!you can use the easy misyeet

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:42 am
by VP Baltar
In post 916, Iconeum wrote:
In post 913, VP Baltar wrote:
In post 908, Iconeum wrote:do you think i should be townreading you, vp?
You can have whatever read you want on me. I think it is illogical to put me in a scumpile with dunn/Gamma.

Those theories of the game are in direct conflict with each other. Or at least they would appear to be if i was in your shoes.

Seems a bit contrived.
So Fun and Games is equally bad with their readslist because they have me as scum *with* Dunn, whom I want yeeted today?
I haven't looked for associatives between you and Dunn yet. I will say that F&G hasn't struck me as super suspicious to this point. I saw you were making some kind of case against them in the last few pages. I'll give that a careful look when I do a detailed catchup post in a few hours.