Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2022 4:05 pm
boy there's like 3 left
I feel like the first bit was already pretty well explained. Why I did not vote the moment I saw the thing that pinged me. Why I voted when I did. Why I played it off as a joke (despite it never actually being a joke vote). And why my vote is still there - after his return to the thread, it is my desire is for Ircher to die today.In post 896, Vivax wrote:So you pointed out Ircher's mistake first? I think. But you only voted when Peta had to make you vote. Then it was a joke vote, but...
But you're still voting Ircher are you not? Occasionally popping in to question people who townread you.
Fair enough. But you were just playing the receiving end, what kind of engaging is that?In post 903, Lukewarm wrote:I feel like the first bit was already pretty well explained. Why I did not vote the moment I saw the thing that pinged me. Why I voted when I did. Why I played it off as a joke (despite it never actually being a joke vote). And why my vote is still there - after his return to the thread, it is my desire is for Ircher to die today.In post 896, Vivax wrote:So you pointed out Ircher's mistake first? I think. But you only voted when Peta had to make you vote. Then it was a joke vote, but...
But you're still voting Ircher are you not? Occasionally popping in to question people who townread you.
So it does feel like you are not genuinely engaging with me, so I think I'll stop responding to you today
whatIn post 884, Uncrowned wrote:i don't get why you question me, gets answers, ignore them, and then shift your vote from me to titus after ydrasse unvotes me
it's like you want to engage but then when you actually receive answers, you just go to something else while still throwing shade, like keeping your options open?
"idk why people think uncrowned is town because ive looked at his scumplay, but it also looks like his townplay" or whatever. it's just constant hedging and has been a theme of your play this game. your actual solidified reads are few and far between and it seems like you're leaving doors open to keep your play flexible, something i'd attribute much more as +scum. maybe it's the low confidence thing you're talking about, but this seems awfully non-committal
i was responding to a specific meta point that someone made, idk why it would apply to meIn post 886, Uncrowned wrote:it's like you see opportunities to make comments but then not provided much follow up? like the titus vote in general doesn't feel super convincingIn post 598, fireisredsir wrote:it kinda seems like her thoughts are surface level intended to sound reasonable tho? like she hasn't said anything super out there it's just that they don't feel like they quite click into a consistent mindset, like luke was saying
also, couldn't we apply this same logic to you? what makes your two slots different? up until your vote on her, you had very little to say about her so what changed? from what i'm aware of, her main string of posting had already occurred before your vote on me, and you didn't have a lot to say then
i think his responses to you do have a sort of self-focus to them? idk how to describe. insistence on being understood, maybeIn post 899, Vivax wrote:I'd say Luke displays some characteristics you'd associate with a martyr mindset, but according to some, feeling of guilt being scum-indicative is somewhat of an unbased rumour
I understand Luke, but also that their position wasn‘t an independent one. Lots of pressure to act quickly, it seems.In post 907, fireisredsir wrote:i think his responses to you do have a sort of self-focus to them? idk how to describe. insistence on being understood, maybeIn post 899, Vivax wrote:I'd say Luke displays some characteristics you'd associate with a martyr mindset, but according to some, feeling of guilt being scum-indicative is somewhat of an unbased rumour
anyway, it's p in line with what ive seen from town luke and i lean that way so far. i haven't seen scum luke in person tho, only from a distance
i thought we were waiting for bluebloodedtoffee to make an appearance and that's why there hasn't been a hammer yetIn post 908, Vivax wrote:Time will tell, but I feel there‘s a good roster of hesitating people around Ircher. A town flip would throw my perception around though.
Eh, I was waiting for something else, but interference will prevent it. I don‘t have reasons left to play this game, should just use them for a story. But the distant memory will stick.In post 910, fireisredsir wrote:i thought we were waiting for bluebloodedtoffee to make an appearance and that's why there hasn't been a hammer yetIn post 908, Vivax wrote:Time will tell, but I feel there‘s a good roster of hesitating people around Ircher. A town flip would throw my perception around though.
it dependsIn post 779, Andresvmb wrote:Since when do you not care about votes on you? Or engaging with the people voting you? I just don’t remember you posting like this when we’ve played in the past. Do I have it wrong? Like why the nonchalance? I usually get irritated when I’m read wrongly and people get all stubborn about it. I remember you caring a bit. What happened? Is there anything specific to this game?In post 486, Ydrasse wrote:Trewly i do not careIn post 484, Uncrowned wrote:ydrasse how do you feel about your wagon
I've played with some that prob think that way.In post 810, Andresvmb wrote:genuinely enjoy accusing others of lying or not making sense and getting screamed at in return.
would be funny if Ircher was just town that unknowingly "slipped" and the scum are voting him b/c they think he knows too much about the setup.In post 828, Andresvmb wrote:I’m of the opinion that you would have seen Scum be more obvious about the assumption to try and avoid it being interpreted as a slip
I think that if he's scum his intention is to antagonize and annoy you. Or maybe I'm the one being dumb b/c I have a very very hard time believing that he actually thinks this.In post 843, Andresvmb wrote:Hahaha okay. I think you’re Scum doubling down on a bad take.
this is a dumb post and totes not what he said.In post 853, Something_Smart wrote:You think Ircher deliberately baited a wagon on himself? How?In post 851, RCEnigma wrote:Wit that said, Ircher is the type of scum that’s willing to take a bullet for a partner. So I don’t think Titus’ argument that Irchers wagon sprung up to divert from someone else is merit-less.
In post 862, RCEnigma wrote:I don’t agree that it makes you/SS 1 or 2 scum. Though I do think there is scum between you.In post 858, Ircher wrote:No, it is meritless because there was no wagon to divert from.In post 851, RCEnigma wrote:Wit that said, Ircher is the type of scum that’s willing to take a bullet for a partner. So I don’t think Titus’ argument that Irchers wagon sprung up to divert from someone else is merit-less.
Normally I'd agree but I can't see talking about much that would help us and not give useful info to scum. There are a few different roles I could think of with this mechanic that could counter things.In post 912, Nero Cain wrote:my unabated tinfoil is that scum are trying to rush d1 b4 town understand/talk about mechanics. I also really hate mech focused games.
Mark my words, I won‘t rest until all of you have caterpillars crawling out of your eyecorners while reading my posts, spit your beverages and buy my farts in a jar for 5kIn post 918, Nero Cain wrote:Who are u?
Tis a disarmed country, sirIn post 921, Nero Cain wrote:How come RNG is so cruel and wouldn't grant me bullets? I'd give petapans left foot to see a dead Vivax