Page 368 of 385
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:47 pm
by Ankamius
holy shit
RR literally showed that his bulletproof is 1-shot today
there's no claimed ability to prevent kills on that night because all claimed actions have been disproven
SO THE ONLY WAY THE KILL COULD'VE BEEN STOPPED IS BY SCUM, MEANING SCUM NO KILLED
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:47 pm
by Titus
In post 9169, Flavor Leaf wrote:3 town JOATS, tracker, watcher, voyeur, plus Vanilla Cop, scum have a ninja to counteract it.
That’s what I expected Ankamius to claim, that or follower instead of watcher.
The logical action for scum last night was to kill you or Pine. Not gobble. The only reason to deviate is if you knew a watcher was coming. Ank knew his fake would be watching Pine.
What's doubly interesting is we could have used the Watcher role to give Espy another use of his role.
I am perfectly ok with an Ank lynch.
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:48 pm
by Ankamius
I'll give you a hint
I've been clearing RR this game because I didn't see a plan to confirm them mechanically
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:48 pm
by Flavor Leaf
That’s our only protective, the big 1 shot bp, and I think I believe it. No other reasons setup spec why on town’s side. Scum didn’t no kill there.
That’s confirmed now with the final claim.
RR is town. TSE no Venged.
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:48 pm
by Titus
In post 9170, Flavor Leaf wrote: In post 9166, Titus wrote: In post 9159, Ankamius wrote:now tell me
WHY DOES NOBODY DIE ON THE NIGHT THAT GOBBLE WAS SUPPOSEDLY PROTECTED BY RR?
RR wifomed it and protected FL instead.
Either scum shot FL and TSE no venged OR scum no killed.
Scum RR doesn't likely no kill unless he's certain TSE dies in the near future.
You know what, TSE probably didn’t mean to no venge, they were probably just MIA the entire time, and straight up missed the timer.
Timer was cut short. Either TSE chose to no venge, or he venged RR.
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:49 pm
by Sherlock and Watson
why the fuck are you still debating this, scum definitely no killed
-S
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:49 pm
by Ankamius
TSE choosing to no venge means if RR is town, the lynch is his fault and nobody else's
this is strong evidence that RR is scum
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:50 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 9179, Titus wrote: In post 9170, Flavor Leaf wrote: In post 9166, Titus wrote: In post 9159, Ankamius wrote:now tell me
WHY DOES NOBODY DIE ON THE NIGHT THAT GOBBLE WAS SUPPOSEDLY PROTECTED BY RR?
RR wifomed it and protected FL instead.
Either scum shot FL and TSE no venged OR scum no killed.
Scum RR doesn't likely no kill unless he's certain TSE dies in the near future.
You know what, TSE probably didn’t mean to no venge, they were probably just MIA the entire time, and straight up missed the timer.
Timer was cut short. Either TSE chose to no venge, or he venged RR.
I don’t think that’s what happened, that requires a No kill by scum. Why no kill?
They didn’t. They shot and it didn’t go through. That’s also why Ankamius is pushing the “why would scum no kill?” They didn’t, and she knows we can’t answer that correctly
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:50 pm
by Flavor Leaf
Why would they no kill? Who were they soft confirming?
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:51 pm
by Titus
Scum no killing definitely points to someone who could be cleared by the babysitting TSE role, assuming we wouldn't lynch to clear the issue.
Otherwise, a no kill risks creating a random townfirm that scum must deal with.
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:52 pm
by Ankamius
and if you think my claim is 'too perfect,' then consider this
1. Why do you think I went out of my way to get scumread throughout the game
2. Why do you think I was so secretive about my PR, to the extent that I only willingly claimed it when my neighbor was being ran up
3. Why do you think I forcibly shut down a massclaim
4. Why do you think I CLAIMED TO HAVE A MANIPULATIVE ROLE?
5. Why do you think I wouldn't bank on a watcher shot to be my main contribution to the game when the way it progressed makes it nearly impossible for me to have contributions by play?
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:52 pm
by Sherlock and Watson
the game is full of fucking joats and the ninja was dead
they needed to drain out any remaining track/watches/whateverthefuckelses
-S
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:52 pm
by Ankamius
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:53 pm
by Titus
Which definitely means someone largely townread to survive against a townfirm or eat it themselves, which is back to Ank
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:53 pm
by Ankamius
I'm largely townread???
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:53 pm
by Alisae
SHE WATCHES PINE KEKW
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:53 pm
by Sherlock and Watson
In post 9184, Titus wrote:Otherwise, a no kill risks creating a random townfirm that scum must deal with.
no kill keeps the game on evens before scum knew that vanilla results meched people as town
it was meant to push the game more into mountainous I think
-S
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:55 pm
by Titus
In post 9191, Sherlock and Watson wrote: In post 9184, Titus wrote:Otherwise, a no kill risks creating a random townfirm that scum must deal with.
no kill keeps the game on evens before scum knew that vanilla results meched people as town
it was meant to push the game more into mountainous I think
-S
Keeping the game on evens benefits town more than scum. We get an extra lynch and I keep plan T if we lynch in mylo. We'll have a conftown if it gets that far anyway.
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:55 pm
by Flavor Leaf
Okay, I believe that, however that actually raises Ank’s town equity...? Nah, it’s super late, they can’t have expected that many more. There has to be some other reason. It’s a reason, but idk if that’s strong enough considering.
Ank’s role fits really nicely, almost too nicely, and like, I was thinking about that exact role...interesting.
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:56 pm
by Sherlock and Watson
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:56 pm
by Titus
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:57 pm
by Titus
It does. Gobble requested me not to explain. I am going to ask you to trust me here.
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:57 pm
by Ankamius
k well
I have nothing more to add
let me know when it's time to prodge
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:57 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 9184, Titus wrote:
Scum no killing definitely points to someone who could be cleared by the babysitting TSE role, assuming we wouldn't lynch to clear the issue.
Otherwise, a no kill risks creating a random townfirm that scum must deal with.
What night was the no kill?
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:59 pm
by Titus
In post 9198, Flavor Leaf wrote: In post 9184, Titus wrote:
Scum no killing definitely points to someone who could be cleared by the babysitting TSE role, assuming we wouldn't lynch to clear the issue.
Otherwise, a no kill risks creating a random townfirm that scum must deal with.
What night was the no kill?
Night 4.
We then lynched TSE after the NK because I wanted to actually confirm Ank.