Since you take credit for Juls death, enlighten us as to why you pwnt juls.
Rhinox - 2 (Korts, tubby)
Korts - 1 (Rhinox)
Not Voting - 4 (Vi, freeko, Raider, TonyMontana)
With seven alive, it takes four to lynch.
Korts wrote:Also even if you're really the cause of that kill you may still be scum with a one-shot vig in addition
How many 1-shots do I have you say I killed Occam, who was mugged. I say I killed juls, who was stabbed. If I'm 1 shot, how does that explain Jul's death if you alledgedly got information that I killed Occam, and how would I be able to kill tonight?korts wrote:I don't want him to nightkill tonight.
Its right here:freeko wrote:RHinox, you said that you are not part of teh town. Does that make you something then more in the way of an SK.
Since you take credit for Juls death, enlighten us as to why you pwnt juls.
And no, I'm not part of the town in flavor, but my job is to protect the town - I win and lose with the town, so stucturally, I'm all town.Rhinox wrote:I didn't use my ability at all night one, because of being limited to an unknown number of uses, and not wanting to waste my uses and accidentally hitting town.I killed Juls night 2. I wasn't entirely sure she was town, but I wanted to use my ability because we already had 2 mislynches, and I would be able to vig without causing the town to lose, and provide information to the town based on Juls death, and at worst give the town better odds at hitting scum today by removing a player from consideration. I was also putting some trust into Vi's belief that Juls was scum.Since Juls was scum, thats what caused me to believe Vi was town and use my * signal, desperately hoping Vi would pick it up.
fixed a typoRhinox wrote:I didn't use my ability at all night one, because of being limited to an unknown number of uses, and not wanting to waste my uses and accidentally hitting town.I killed Juls night 2. I wasn't entirely sure she wasSince Juls was scum, thats what caused me to believe Vi was town and use my * signal, desperately hoping Vi would pick it up.townscum, but I wanted to use my ability because we already had 2 mislynches, and I would be able to vig without causing the town to lose, and provide information to the town based on Juls death, and at worst give the town better odds at hitting scum today by removing a player from consideration. I was also putting some trust into Vi's belief that Juls was scum.
I think it is, as there are only 4 roles that have not fully claimed and 3 of those have semi-claimed. TM is the only role that we have no idea about.freeko wrote:Thats believeable enough. Think its time for the mass claim game now?And no, I'm not part of the town in flavor, but my job is to protect the town - I win and lose with the town, so stucturally, I'm all town.
I got that part (not that I agree), what i was wondering was which you think i'm doing now? scum or town?tubby216 wrote:@tm what i am saying is you post less and your posts are smaller when you are scum, you put more detail in as town
The only 1:1 trade that's gonna happen here is if someone else claims the juls kill. In absence of a counterclaim, I have to believe Rhinox.Korts wrote:Here's my offer. I still think Rhinox is scum; hell, I'm convinced 100%. I don't want him to nightkill tonight. So lynch Rhinox today, lynch me tomorrow if he turns out to be what he claims to be-which he won't. A 1:1 trade is very good even at this point.
Oh good 2 quiestions here so you get 2 answers.I got that part (not that I agree), what i was wondering was which you think i'm doing now? scum or town?
Maybe a forecasxt of things to come? Lets see.Well it certainly doesn't help me, when I don't know what your reasons for believing so are.AFAIK, there could be black sheeps, so to speak.
So you say you are a sheep here on your post #15 then here comes post #16.. oh wait its your next post after your "claim"Baaah.
But I have reason to believe I wouldn't count towards raiders supposed two sheep.
I can't really say for sure though, since I don't have any idea what his info is.
Now wtf is this. A takeback on the claim? Maybe so. More to the dislike of me is the part after that.. Lets everyone just shut up huh? How does that help the town exactly?I take it back, I'm not a sheep :p
But seriously, sheep, keep your mouth shut, and lets stop this premature claiming, sheep or not.
Gee I wonder why. I do not believe this little faux pas has been explained yet. The rest of teh day is prety much wasted by trying to shift attention with a vote on me and then as afatchic turned the end of the day insto a circus he was more than happy to indulge. Thats about his whole day 2.I didn't say I wanted everyone to shut up about claiming. I said I didn't want anyone to claim sheep.
First of all, talk about a travesty of an out-of-context quote.freeko wrote:Now wtf is this. A takeback on the claim?I take it back, I'm not a sheep :p
But seriously, sheep, keep your mouth shut, and lets stop this premature claiming, sheep or not.
Honestly, the ":p" and "But seriously" didn't give away that I was jokingly pretending to take back the sheep claim because I just hypothesized being an outed sheep could be dangerous? Anyone who continues to bring up this "faux pas" is either a dimwit or opportunistic. Or possibly both.TonyMontana wrote:Your win condition isn't to prevent this from happening, is it?raider 609 wrote:Someone is trying to make sure the sheep get to the next town for who knows what reason. Its a make sure they get there type thing and not a everyone must be dead type thing. That is why I think the sheep is town.
I'm being (sort of) facetious, but in any case, if there's an objective of getting some sheep to town, is it not possible someone has an objective of stopping this? Or it might just simply be in the interest of the scum.
I take it back, I'm not a sheep:p, sheep, keep your mouth shut, and lets stop this premature claiming, sheep or not.
But seriously
weaksauce.tubby216 wrote:ok i think i'l claim as well
i am a dumb sheep all i care about is getting to my next meal, i win when all threats to the town have been eliminated
mmm.... inconsistencies I see...Korts wrote:Ok, here's my claim. I am a ram, and I am bulletproof because my wool has grown too thick. I can survive one nightkill attempt per night. I win when every threat to the town has been eliminated.
The information that Rhinox is scum was not role-based. Unfortunately I can't be less ambiguous about this. See my post 844.
What we know is at least 1 of the 3 sheep are lying. I believe its korts because he's BSing information about how I "killed Occam" - Korts, why don't you give us a summary of what was told to you in your own words... sorta like how raider did.tubby216 wrote:ok is it beneficial for those that are sheep to claim at this point?
to me is seems anti town for them to claim.
i also see freeko's relentless persuit of this highly anti town.
that mixed with his posts appear to be missleading.
so with that
vote freeko
"bulletproof" is the general role name of a NK-immune townie. It is not flavor in this instance.Rhinox wrote:There are no guns in this game. There are (apparently) wolves who maul things, and a vig with a pike. No guns, unless anybody wants to claim to have a gun to back up your claim. That means, bulletproof you are not. NK immune GF or SK perhaps?
I cannot be any less ambiguous. See my post 844.Rhinox wrote:What we know is at least 1 of the 3 sheep are lying. I believe its korts because he's BSing information about how I "killed Occam" - Korts, why don't you give us a summary of what was told to you in your own words... sorta like how raider did.