Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:13 pm
"Launder, Craft Fetish and Ward can also cause insanity"
Questions and votes aren't lovers. They can and do exist without each other. Much like how I asked you this!Because there's no point throwing more questions at people who are already being interrogated adequately. I'm looking for people who are ducking attention.
Soooo you're pretty clearly saying one of the huge wagons is someone you think is scum.Out of those tingling my scumdar and not already dogpiled, I choose Bowser.
reply to this seacoreFurcolow wrote:if you are an investigator why are you suspicious of me for warding?
are you claiming i didnt ward?
if you are claiming i didnt ward, why would i claim ward BEFORE ANYONE ELSE?
if I didn't ward, why did El Goosuki hear noise?
i also read that wards would cause you to hear noise, but percy changed the rule on me
furthermore, i really thought my ward had gone down alphabetically at one point
how is this not convincing to you, seacore?
if you want to HELP the town, find some scum
I'm not suspicous of you for warding. I think warding was one of the good actions. I don't entirely believe your ward claim, that is my point.Furcolow wrote:if you are an investigator why are you suspicious of me for warding?
I have no idea what you did or didn't do, I just feel there's evidence heavily suggesting that you have lied about your night action, whether you have lied about your action, target or bothare you claiming i didnt ward?
why wouldn't you claim that? It's a really safe action that explains noiseif you are claiming i didnt ward, why would i claim ward BEFORE ANYONE ELSE?
Perhaps you stalked them, or perhaps you're cult and a fetish was made of them.if I didn't ward, why did El Goosuki hear noise?
Well I'm trying to do that, but currently I'm having to defend myself against, what I feel were, responses to two causes of concern, you and Benmage.i also read that wards would cause you to hear noise, but percy changed the rule on me
furthermore, i really thought my ward had gone down alphabetically at one point
how is this not convincing to you, seacore?
if you want to HELP the town, find some scum
Ward could not cause an insanity on N0 as it only causes one on a dead target.Furcolow wrote:"Launder, Craft Fetish and Ward can also cause insanity"
(i) Faraday attributed his Triglav vote to "mostly gut" in the QT, so you'd have to ask him for more detail. I was okay with the vote because I thought Trig's vote on xvart was weak, and because Triglav was lurking and needed some pressure on him to step up their activity.AurorusVox wrote:I've mostly liked Lost Butterfly's earlier posts, but (i) the vote for Triglav on page 4 came out of nowhere. I asked for clarification on this earlier. (ii) Also, the "bad vibes" from VP Baltar's post is odd - attributed to the smilies, of which he uses one (I get that it's a joke but it's also factually inaccurate!). (iii) His vote on Furc after saying how town he finds him stinks of opportunistic voting. The speed at which he declared it a technical error was astounding
Okay, admitidly I totally forgot about denial, although lets face it, that would not be a good insanity for a potential murderer to pick.Plum wrote:Well if you FLIP Investigator no one's going to go 'HERP DERP HE MIGHT BE A MURDERER'. Before they go Psycho, Murderers can be reformed or even just be misguided Townies who eant to stay Investigator. And besides, what if someone wanted to go Murderer and took Denial last Night HUH Mister wiseguy? In conclusion, your premise is full of holes.
Sorry, but I'm going after Cult until we actually get people Murdering. Benmage doesn't count because claimed one-time Murdering Investigators make it almost impossible for them to win or do damage as Murderers if the Town doesn't fall over dead drunk.
Though youcan[ only get an Insanity from Ward if you Ward someone who's dead, so that happens to be inapplicable.
Lost Butterfly wrote:Oh, and I still haven't ISO'd AurorusVox, but I've been feeling better about AurorusVox and worse about SpyreX as the day has progressed. Plum and Benmage--aka, the people who'd cast doubt on SpyreX--exactly what in particularly bothers? Personally, he looked blindingly town at first, but it seems as though he's forcing his case a bit.
Lost Butterfly wrote:I already suspected Baltar and xvart (although I'd be surprised if both were scum based on how xvart followed Baltar onto me), and have had doubts of RC because of how shamelessly he jockeys for influence by kissing up to people, appealing to their past history, and padding his posts with fluffy jokes. (I've been meaning to ask Magna and Plum--both of whom have experience with him but have come to completely opposite reads--for a while if all the obnoxious buddying and joking is in character with ReaperCharlie's town self.)
Lost Butterfly:Seacore wrote:Wow, just wow. What exactly have you brought to the game Furc? Your list of certain scum? Please wait until I'm lynched and revealed as somebody with 0 insanity points before you answer that.Furcolow wrote:unvote;
vote: seacore
even if this guy is town, he will not help us
he obviously is incapable
I've haven't got there because a.) I still have a hate-on for AV despite all you tsk, tskers. b.) you'll notice I'm holding a whole MESS of things closer to the vest than I would normally due to the madness of the setup.Butterfly wrote:SpyreX: I'd like to know why you've only attacked AurorusVox, but not people whose interactions concerning the Furc/Ben/Fate clusterfuck have been worse IMO (for example, MagnaofIllusion, xvart--other than a throwaway sentence--kunkstar, Baby Spice, rewq, us when Lost Butterfly had voted Furcolow).
Also, what do you think of Trilobite? Because I think Furpants is looking miles better than Trilobite in their exchange...and yet you only seem to mind Furpants.
Because if somehow you got THAT being what I'm getting at then I may, in fact, explode.I now have a slight town read on AurorusVox after ISO reading him. His big oopsies seem to be that he wasn't willing to instantly clear Furcolow, being wishy-washy on Benmage, and perhaps trying to take too much credit for clearing Furc.
Plum, I'm not saying I'm a great player. I'm fairly rubbish at scumhunting through posts, my talent comes from moments of insight when I combine investigations with claims, find holes of logic and catch scum that way. I caught 2 scum in PYP1 through that.Plum wrote:I'm not saying you were, I'm saying that given your position on Benmage this was a bit . . . yeah:
Seacore wrote:Wow, just wow. What exactly have you brought to the game Furc? Your list of certain scum? Please wait until I'm lynched and revealed as somebody with 0 insanity points before you answer that.Furcolow wrote:unvote;
vote: seacore
even if this guy is town, he will not help us
he obviously is incapable
Furcolow wrote:"Launder, Craft Fetish and Ward can also cause insanity"
If anybody is keeping a tally of how confused Furc seems to be getting about the consequences of his claimed N0 action, please add this to it.Furcolow wrote:that being said, it did not cause me any insanity, so i don't know why that's in the OP. Perhaps if you ward a stalk, or the passing of a fetish.
Questions without votes are fine, when people you're asking questions of are answering. Seems like Bowser could use a little nudge to contribute.SpyreX wrote:Questions and votes aren't lovers. They can and do exist without each other. Much like how I asked you this!
I'm also saying that I think there are other, non-wagonned people I think might be scum. But I don't have any reasonable basis to point fingers yet, nor do I think I'll extract more information for town by putting more pressure on players already under pressure from others.SpyreX wrote:Soooo you're pretty clearly saying one of the huge wagons is someone you think is scum.Out of those tingling my scumdar and not already dogpiled, I choose Bowser.
I'm sure missing words that back that up.
My statement implies that the total group of players is divided in two ways:SpyreX wrote:Ok, I'm tired and have to sleep.
But I'm not seeing at ALL how:
Out of those tingling my scumdarand not already dogpiled, I choose Bowser.
=
I'm also saying that I think there are other,non-wagonned peopleI think might be scum.
:GOODPOSTING:Furpants_Tom wrote:Bit curious about this Seacore wagon, now. What's the purpose? We've got 8 days to go, there's no information you guys particularly seem to be looking for from him, and yet you're happy to take much of the pressure off other suspects who haven't talked so much - like Bowser, <redacted> and <redacted>, for example.
Attention: Trilobite and hitogoroshi, very interested in your votes in this regard.
P.S. Rethought pinging my other scumreads on the preview screen; since I'm not ready to explain them. One at a time, easy as she goes.