Page 38 of 79

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:38 pm
by Sonic Boom
istott wrote:There is a general consensus that I am a one shot miller.
You investigate me, I show as guilty, youre probably sane. You investigate me and I show as innocent, you're probably insane.


Oh, I forgot you replaced that jackal dude LOL

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:38 pm
by istott
I'm not sure why Mollie voted for me. I think my 920 may have looked somewhat over confident in other players reads of me.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:39 pm
by istott
Sonic Boom wrote:
istott wrote:There is a general consensus that I am a one shot miller.
You investigate me, I show as guilty, youre probably sane. You investigate me and I show as innocent, you're probably insane.


Oh, I forgot you replaced that jackal dude LOL

Yeah.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:39 pm
by Sonic Boom
Sonic Boom wrote:
istott wrote:At this moment, I still feel comfortable voting prohawk. I would also be fine with Guille being lynched. These two are my main scumreads at the moment.
For Guille, take a look at this:
guille2015 wrote:Fine Fine,
My shos explanation is Up there.
I'll get into more detail in a little while.

guille2015 wrote:Little by little sonic is growing in scummyness. But if my memory serves correctly i've played the heads or hydra and they have played similarly. Don't recall if they were scum or not.
Must check it later.

guille2015 wrote:The sad part about everything is that i don't understand why others pinned you as town during your first half of the game.
I must check that.

guille2015 wrote:and yes, I know the deadline is coming up.
I'll get to it
when my mind clears.

guille2015 wrote:
Ok, I'm going to have to ISO prohawk without any bias
. Can't do it right know.

Are you a politician? You are reeking of active lurking.
In fact, while I am still scumreading Prohawk, I feel my vote would be better on VOTE: Guille.
I plan on doing a quickfire round of questions, if anyone has any questions they would like me to answer (that can be answered quickly), fire away!


Istott is town


I thought you were referring to this


Apparently it was the '1 shot miller' which I expressed great displeasure

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:42 pm
by istott
Please clarify the last sentence of that post, boom. I didn't understand it.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:00 pm
by Sonic Boom
I don't like the '1 shot miller' claim, and I would have called Jackal scum based on it. You appear townier, thus I am just going to ignore the claim instead of calling you scum too.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:04 pm
by Bulbazak
pirate mollie wrote:VOTE: istott


I'm assuming this is for the miller claim?

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:26 pm
by istott
Sonic Boom wrote:I don't like the '1 shot miller' claim, and I would have called Jackal scum based on it. You appear townier, thus I am just going to ignore the claim instead of calling you scum too.

By ignoring the claim, do you mean that you don't believe it?

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:08 pm
by istott
Bulbazak wrote:
pirate mollie wrote:VOTE: istott


I'm assuming this is for the miller claim?

I dunno, I claimed in one of my first posts.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:10 pm
by Mathdino
VOTE: Sonic Boom

Don't believe you.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:18 pm
by Bulbazak
You don't think Mollie is town?

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:18 pm
by Mathdino
I don't believe Sonic's a cop.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:25 pm
by Bulbazak
I do. Claiming a guilty on Mollie and then turning around to say that he must be insane is not a pro-scum move. It essentially turns him into policy lynch material, which is bad for a scum wincon. He'd have been better off claiming an innocent on a town player and leaving sanity ambiguous. The only way this makes sense for Sonic-scum is if you also believe Mollie is scum, which you've given zero indication.

Plus, I believe Sonic-town would investigate Mollie for those reasons.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:29 pm
by Mathdino
That entire argument is WIFOM unfortunately. Voided flipped sane cop. The only way to avoid the multiple cops scenario is to impilcitly claim non-sane cop.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:38 pm
by Bulbazak
Is there a reason other than the claim why you think he is scum, or are you going after the easy lynch?

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:58 pm
by Mathdino
He was scummy enough prior to his claim to warrant voting him. I just don't believe the claim.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:13 pm
by pirate mollie
Bulbazak wrote:I do. Claiming a guilty on Mollie and then turning around to say that he must be insane is not a pro-scum move. It essentially turns him into policy lynch material, which is bad for a scum wincon. He'd have been better off claiming an innocent on a town player and leaving sanity ambiguous. The only way this makes sense for Sonic-scum is if you also believe Mollie is scum, which you've given zero indication.

Plus, I believe Sonic-town would investigate Mollie for those reasons.


I have survived 3 fake cop claims from scum!

it is true!

I missed a page and missed sonic's fake claim guilty on me!

I don't believe for a second that they are so retarded that if they questioned their sanity that they would not test it against something proveable.

VOTE: sonic boom

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:15 pm
by Bulbazak
Mollie, you didn't answer my last question.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:16 pm
by istott
Why did you vote me, Mollie?

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:29 pm
by pirate mollie
Bulbazak wrote:Is there a reason other than the claim why you think he is scum, or are you going after the easy lynch?


what would be the positive return for going after lynchbait this early in the game? ffs, go after strong town, shit up the game and make it unreadable for town on d2. that is pretty standard scum play.

I was wondering if istott was lying cos in quicklynch I saw scum claim miller d1 and make it to endgame based on that claim. I don't know istott and yes the vote is based on his claim. I missed sonic claiming a guilty!

I don't hate sonic but fully expect you people to get retarded on me. his claim on d1 looked fake as shit and he is trying to do a save for his team me thinks. points to coaching methinks.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:00 pm
by Bulbazak
pirate mollie wrote:
what would be the positive return for going after lynchbait this early in the game?


The lynch bait in this game are easy policy lynches. Nobody would look twice if scum stuck a vote there.

pirate mollie wrote:
ffs, go after strong town, shit up the game and make it unreadable for town on d2. that is pretty standard scum play.


I don't think there's such a thing as standard scum play. You've seen enough variation to know this. Why are you pushing the opposite?

Also, what is the scum advantage to claiming 1-shot miller over regular miller?

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:09 pm
by pirate mollie
Bulbazak wrote:
pirate mollie wrote:
what would be the positive return for going after lynchbait this early in the game?


The lynch bait in this game are easy policy lynches. Nobody would look twice if scum stuck a vote there.

pirate mollie wrote:
ffs, go after strong town, shit up the game and make it unreadable for town on d2. that is pretty standard scum play.


I don't think there's such a thing as standard scum play. You've seen enough variation to know this. Why are you pushing the opposite?

Also, what is the scum advantage to claiming 1-shot miller over regular miller?


the advantage would more than likely be the same as claiming infinitive miller?

I mean this is hedging on a miller claim.

on 1 hand I get metal might have viewed me if he was town but I DON'T get why not test it against the claimed miller first.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:11 pm
by Bulbazak
I get that, but then I remember it's Metal, so I can see how that can happen.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:11 pm
by Bulbazak
He also forgot Istott was a claimed miller.

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:20 pm
by mastin2
Right. You guys are fast. Totally forgot that fact.