Mafiascum.net

In post 922, Ausuka wrote:

In post 915, Panopticon wrote:

In post 909, Ausuka wrote:

In post 904, Panopticon wrote: kicking up a huge fuss in the thread over nothing and being a distraction from any and all play

In post 904, Panopticon wrote: and overall annoyance with playstyle)

Why do these things make Quick scum to you?

Because this type of play tends to get players townread, despite all logical reasons otherwise. A fact I have used to my advantage before.

~The Observer

Why does that make Quick scum for playing this way though? It's not like town can't do these things?

[1]

pedit: I was talking to quick, not you, pano.

[2]

and @quick, I never said I townread cheeky. I said my read was balanced, because I liked her tone, but I didn't like the vote on brigand. and I said this after I ISO'd her, because I was asked to give my thoughts on her.

In post 922, Ausuka wrote:

In post 915, Panopticon wrote:

In post 909, Ausuka wrote:

In post 904, Panopticon wrote: kicking up a huge fuss in the thread over nothing and being a distraction from any and all play

In post 904, Panopticon wrote: and overall annoyance with playstyle)

Why do these things make Quick scum to you?

Because this type of play tends to get players townread, despite all logical reasons otherwise. A fact I have used to my advantage before.

~The Observer

Why does that make Quick scum for playing this way though? It's not like town can't do these things?

pedit: I was talking to quick, not you, pano.
and @quick, I never said I townread cheeky. I said my read was balanced, because I liked her tone, but I didn't like the vote on brigand. and I said this after I ISO'd her, because I was asked to give my thoughts on her.

In post 929, Creature wrote:I guess I need to gather my townreads first.

In post 924, Ausuka wrote:

In post 919, Quick wrote:

In post 918, Ausuka wrote:are you seriously trying to say I'm lying about having to sleep and go to school? really?

I'm not.

Then I have no idea what point you're trying to make.

In post 926, Panopticon wrote:

In post 922, Ausuka wrote:

In post 915, Panopticon wrote:

In post 909, Ausuka wrote:

In post 904, Panopticon wrote: kicking up a huge fuss in the thread over nothing and being a distraction from any and all play

In post 904, Panopticon wrote: and overall annoyance with playstyle)

Why do these things make Quick scum to you?

Because this type of play tends to get players townread, despite all logical reasons otherwise. A fact I have used to my advantage before.

~The Observer

Why does that make Quick scum for playing this way though? It's not like town can't do these things?

[1]

pedit: I was talking to quick, not you, pano.

[2]

and @quick, I never said I townread cheeky. I said my read was balanced, because I liked her tone, but I didn't like the vote on brigand. and I said this after I ISO'd her, because I was asked to give my thoughts on her.

1: Because it pays off later in the game. If quick isn't lynched today, he will coast to endgame.
2: My bad

~The Observer

In post 932, Quick wrote:

In post 924, Ausuka wrote:

In post 919, Quick wrote:

In post 918, Ausuka wrote:are you seriously trying to say I'm lying about having to sleep and go to school? really?

I'm not.

Then I have no idea what point you're trying to make.

You don't have to. Just please answer my questions and I can either clear you or condemn you.

In post 934, Ausuka wrote:

In post 932, Quick wrote:

In post 924, Ausuka wrote:

In post 919, Quick wrote:

In post 918, Ausuka wrote:are you seriously trying to say I'm lying about having to sleep and go to school? really?

I'm not.

Then I have no idea what point you're trying to make.

You don't have to. Just please answer my questions and I can either clear you or condemn you.

I answered your question.

In post 935, Quick wrote:

In post 934, Ausuka wrote:

In post 932, Quick wrote:

In post 924, Ausuka wrote:

In post 919, Quick wrote:

In post 918, Ausuka wrote:are you seriously trying to say I'm lying about having to sleep and go to school? really?

I'm not.

Then I have no idea what point you're trying to make.

You don't have to. Just please answer my questions and I can either clear you or condemn you.

I answered your question.

Who asked you to ISO Cheeky?

In post 933, Ausuka wrote:

In post 926, Panopticon wrote:

In post 922, Ausuka wrote:

In post 915, Panopticon wrote:

In post 909, Ausuka wrote:

In post 904, Panopticon wrote: kicking up a huge fuss in the thread over nothing and being a distraction from any and all play

In post 904, Panopticon wrote: and overall annoyance with playstyle)

Why do these things make Quick scum to you?

Because this type of play tends to get players townread, despite all logical reasons otherwise. A fact I have used to my advantage before.

~The Observer

Why does that make Quick scum for playing this way though? It's not like town can't do these things?

[1]

pedit: I was talking to quick, not you, pano.

[2]

and @quick, I never said I townread cheeky. I said my read was balanced, because I liked her tone, but I didn't like the vote on brigand. and I said this after I ISO'd her, because I was asked to give my thoughts on her.

1: Because it pays off later in the game. If quick isn't lynched today, he will coast to endgame.
2: My bad

~The Observer

well yes, that does mean that if Quick is scum, he's more likely to win, but why do you think it makes Quick more likely to be scum in the first place? because right now I think quick is the perfect lynchbait, and I don't like your push on him.

In post 931, Panopticon wrote:

In post 929, Creature wrote:I guess I need to gather my townreads first.

While you're doing that, can you explain your vote on Brian?

~The Observer

In post 900, northsidegal wrote:

Votecount 1.21

Centipede Syndrome(6)

~ CheekyTeeky(51), Creature(73), Gorkington(45), Quick(157), Tchill13(2), Hopkirk(54)

Srceenplay(2)

~ Brigand Vvulf(18), Toranaga(97)

Hopkirk(2)

~ Thor665(10), Brian Skies(34)

Brian Skies(2)

~ Spiffeh(31), Bins(15)

Tchill13(1)

~ Ausuka(35)

Spiffeh(1)

~ MariaR(5)

Quick(1)

~ Srceenplay(19)

CheekyTeeky(1)

~ GreyICE(21)

Ausuka(1)

~ Panopticon(30)


Not Voting (6): Town Gunner(0), Mafia Gunner(0), Beeboy(56), The Worst(2), Centipede Syndrome(71), Nero Cain(46)

With 21 alive it takes 11 to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2018-04-25 12:53:00)

In post 938, Panopticon wrote:Even if town, his play makes the game hard to read, which is honestly enough reason on it's own to lynch him.

In post 941, Creature wrote:

In post 938, Panopticon wrote:Even if town, his play makes the game hard to read, which is honestly enough reason on it's own to lynch him.

-_-

In post 941, Creature wrote:

In post 938, Panopticon wrote:Even if town, his play makes the game hard to read, which is honestly enough reason on it's own to lynch him.

-_-

In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.

In post 946, Brian Skies wrote:

In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.

That posting style Quick quoted looks familiar to me. Would I be accurate if I said we've played together before?

In post 945, Quick wrote:UNVOTE:

I know what role you are.

In post 948, Ausuka wrote:

In post 945, Quick wrote:UNVOTE:

I know what role you are.

i, uh, haven't really been softing???