Mafiascum.net

In post 924, Ame wrote:Right now I'm thinking Am as the best course of action.

Is this cheeky third-person or are you going to make me sad

I don't want to make you sad! 1 sec

In post 838, Team STRQ wrote:i'll hammer am if it let's wooper live

In post 844, Wooper wrote:VOTE: Amrun #yolo again

In post 846, Ame wrote:VOTE: Amrun

In post 849, Wooper wrote:gonna put your money where your mouth is qt

In post 853, Wooper wrote:no hammer = strq scum

At the point of STRQs post, wooper was going to be lynched, so from the perspective of AM-STRQ why would Stark make this statement just to not follow through? It just makes an unnecessary association. I understand that townStark is claiming it was a disagreement between heads, but I don't see the point of it if it's scumStark with scumAm. This leads me to think it was intentionally made to draw an association between the two (I've forgotten what the term for this is).

And I think Am is ideal because no one is actually scum reading her and she is also in the midst of most people's PoE, so flipping her is I think has the most benefit for solving.

In post 922, Ame wrote:S_S are you dsj?

Am I what now?

Correct, I am not dsjstr.

In post 904, Something_Smart wrote:so we get that information asap

I've just seen him use this phrase before. It is a meme?

No, sounds like a coincidence.

Loool wut. No way you phrased it in the exact same way

In post 928, Ame wrote:

In post 838, Team STRQ wrote:i'll hammer am if it let's wooper live

In post 844, Wooper wrote:VOTE: Amrun #yolo again

In post 846, Ame wrote:VOTE: Amrun

In post 849, Wooper wrote:gonna put your money where your mouth is qt

In post 853, Wooper wrote:no hammer = strq scum

At the point of STRQs post, wooper was going to be lynched, so from the perspective of AM-STRQ why would Stark make this statement just to not follow through? It just makes an unnecessary association. I understand that townStark is claiming it was a disagreement between heads, but I don't see the point of it if it's scumStark with scumAm. This leads me to think it was intentionally made to draw an association between the two (I've forgotten what the term for this is).

I'm not yet fully sold on STRQ-scum.

I agree this is at least a point of evidence against them being scum together. I think it's possible it could possibly be explained away by hydra disagreements on how to play, though.

In post 937, Ame wrote:Loool wut. No way you phrased it in the exact same way

Nvm he said 'get that intel'

In post 938, implosion wrote:possible it could possibly be explained away by hydra disagreements on how to play, though.

Something as significant as bussing their partner? Seems too wonky to go about in thread

What's your degree of sold-ness on STRQ scum/most compelling reasons?

In post 698, Amrun wrote:Implosion, why is trying to engage with you like trying to engage my toddler in a game of chess? You say you’re bored but I open a dialogue and you drop it.

He's probably untrusting of you.

In post 700, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:4 hrs left and I def had a really bad night.
Words of advice. Don't mix liquors kids. Im heading off to bed and will be asleep by deadling.

In post 701, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

Vote Wooper

Just something about this rubs me the wrong way still in the end of this. Sorry friend.

In post 861, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Whooper I'm sorry.
Now crap. I can't vote any of my reads.
And to anyone knowing I was asleep at deadline. Perks of working nights. I have like 5 pages to read up on.

These disclaimers and excuses make me trust you less.

In post 761, Something_Smart wrote:0

Try to live please.

The eleventh-hour vanity push could be theater for town cred. It's not relevant for me. Especially with permanent scum daytalk.

• What's with this use of the word "spicy"? Did I miss something?
  
• @Ame: I've never felt so seen in my life. Thank you so much for the effort and the attention to detail. I can't wait until I get a read on you.
  
• I don't want to go to Heaven because then I won't get to talk to you guys anymore
  
• I regret not being around; I would've voted for STRQ if it meant saving Wooper (Doesn't matter now, though; woulda, coulda, shoulda)
  
• This could've been purposefully done, but Heaven VOTE: popsofctown. She's my strongest townread, and we get to get rid of her font. It's either her or implosion, who can't figure out if he's livid or not.

I understand implosion is untrusting of me but being untrusting of someone typically makes me want to engage more if I am town and trying to read them. Meh.

But, you're the infamous Amrun. You could talk your way out of a paper bag, and then negotiate your way back in. It's terrifying.

I heard Amrun was the one who taught politicians to lie.

"You just tell them the wrong thing...and they believe you!" Class dismissed.

I don’t know if that’s a compliment. Lol

In post 941, Looker wrote:These disclaimers and excuses make me trust you less.

Because I had a shot of patron with people over and 4 beers later I'm nursing a hangover?
And on top of that I had work the next day and I work nights driving so me having an actual On why I wasn't going to be around at deadline makes you trust me less.
Get out.

Ya know what. Gut check time...
At this point I'm going to just trust my reads.
VOTE: pops.

In post 946, Amrun wrote:I don’t know if that’s a compliment. Lol

It is.

In post 947, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

In post 941, Looker wrote:These disclaimers and excuses make me trust you less.

Because I had a shot of patron with people over and 4 beers later I'm nursing a hangover?
And on top of that I had work the next day and I work nights driving so me having an actual

REASON

On why I wasn't going to be around at deadline makes you trust me less.
Get out.

Get out of where? Is rudeness necessary? Reiterating the excuses doesn't make them more believable. I think that you are lying.

In post 948, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Ya know what. Gut check time...
At this point I'm going to just trust my reads.
VOTE: pops.

VOTE: Ame New two top townreads - Ame and implosion.