Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2020 4:36 am
I refuse to engage in that because that is itching for a rule break and fuck that.
I dont bitch. If I bitch. Its for good reason.
I dont bitch. If I bitch. Its for good reason.
Best post of the game so farIn post 916, Lady Chloe wrote:Farkran,
See what occurs when I am displeased?
My psyche is split between two dimensions that impact both at once.
I must assassinate my clone to retain sanity. Good morning to you.
This seems deraily.In post 926, Ginngie wrote:Im gonna make the bold claim that everyone over 100 posts as of this moment is town.
In post 665, springlullaby wrote:@MOD: Are quest leader votes displayed to everyone when we enter quest?
In post 926, Ginngie wrote:Im gonna make the bold claim that everyone over 100 posts as of this moment is town.
This is ad hominem by the way Giingie.In post 922, Ginngie wrote:I refuse to put in effort when you're a live. You're a fucking headache and I'm not going to get drowned out by 20 posts a day spam.
Alright, so your case here is that Farkan is approaching the advantages to lynching springlullaby in too many directions, correct? Since he's proposed lynching her allows us to look into-In post 891, Ame wrote:Nope. It's literally what you said:In post 888, Farkset wrote:No. This is what you forced upon me, the false dichotomy that you've been talking about but was never there in the first place. The true dichotomy is "people who behaved weirdly around springlullaby" VS "people who had reasons behind their behavior around springlullaby". And it's different than what you said there.In post 553, Farkset wrote:1) distance themselves byhaving the scumteam side with or against springlullaby
2) those who are(and the majority) aresiding against herpushing a very easy lhf
3) those who arewill besiding with herhard because she is the one with surface reads/reactionspocketing herIn post 656, Farkset wrote:There are people whiteknighting him for very little reason and people who instead sheep the attackers. Depending on her flip i thinkwe can identify if she was being TMIed town or chainsaw defended as scum.
You are correct. I think she's probably town but it's a read I'd feel terrible about being wrong on. I keep trying to engage with her because I see thought processes/reads that don't make sense to me, but she doesn't seem to want to answer my questions with anything other than "^scum that doesn't read the thread", so I've given up now. I don't have a reason for not trying to push anyone else.In post 792, Ame wrote:I don't think in your heart (or possibly mind) you really believe she is scum. Don't let the bias cloud your judgment! If Spring is just a fallback why haven't you pushed anyone else? Also why do you keep engaging with Spring when clearly nothing is coming out of your interaction except a loop of 'NO U'
1 - Pretty weak honestly. I think the theory is towny though because a tinfoil theory like that is more likely to come from someone with a green role, to be thinking about those sort of things.In post 798, Ame wrote:Hectic (1) what do you think about the case Farkset made in 454? (2) What do you think about the reasoning in their post here:(3) Are you able to interpret the first part of 760? And if so could you translate? If not, what's your best guess?In post 553, Farkset wrote:Unless i have past experiences with you, i'd like to see you quote some posts of mine that are surface level and delusional/manipulative.
For the record, based on this post, 550 and 313 VS the "opposition" i think there is a clear fracture around springlullaby and how to treat her slot. There is only one reason currently to believe she could be town, and that's how others are behaving around her. I think it's more than plausible that scum are putting up a theater to achieve several results:
1) distance themselves by having the scumteam side with or against springlullaby
2) those who are siding against her (and the majority) are pushing a very easy lhf
3) those who are siding with her will be pocketing her hard because she is the one with surface reads/reactions
I agree on not capturing springlullaby today. However, do you not think it beneficial to capture someone due to what Kerset said here?In post 902, Lady Chloe wrote:Blessed Ones,
This is the underlying point on why I haven't voted to capture springlullaby.In post 862, Pink Ball wrote:And even if spring was scum which is unlikely, roleblocking a claimed voyeur is not ideal
As well as point on my hesitance to capture. Some PRs may mechanically need as many XP-gain opportunities as available to effectively serve town.
Capture is not a lynch, but some town players may feel the reward of using their powers to it's highest potential to outweigh the risk of claiming.
This is my final point on the ability of no capture. I accept rebuttals.
In post 693, Farkset wrote:You forgot about xp drain. When scum gets captured they lose all xp and they can't gain this on n1. On n2 they need to train, so it disables their killing abilities them up to n3.
It's main advantage is that it narrows down people capable of nighkilling.
~Kerset
^This
It says you're online on the bottom of the page.In post 938, Hectic wrote:How can you tell I'm here lurking, Ame?
Nice. You carefully take out the hydra you had stored in your backpack. This one has 3 heads, and you hear several complaints behind you about how you're "ruining the game" and that "all hydras should be policy lynched". Your hydra snaps at them and scares the heathens away.In post 773, Lady Chloe wrote:Hectic,
Hydra. They have more eyes for different ways of seeing, and lips to make it harder to speak any lies.In post 674, Hectic wrote:As you wish, Lady Chloe.
You are on the RMS Moriarty. The course is set forXP Island. However, a tragedy has occurred. Captainthe worstwas killed in a freak accident whileVending Fruitto aParanoid Gun Owner. The PGO fled the scene before anyone got a good look at them.
A short time later: springlullaby was found singing poems about Farkset nearby, while Ame was practising her demonic faces. You have a [Hydra, and Portable Ram] at your disposal.
You're bamboozling me, right?In post 941, Ame wrote:It says you're online on the bottom of the page.In post 938, Hectic wrote:How can you tell I'm here lurking, Ame?
https://i.ibb.co/NmWShfM/ms/snippet015.jpgIn post 944, Hectic wrote:You're bamboozling me, right?In post 941, Ame wrote:It says you're online on the bottom of the page.In post 938, Hectic wrote:How can you tell I'm here lurking, Ame?
Prove it with a screenshot.
