Mafiascum.net

In post 613, Noraa wrote:everyone else is even more meh.

In post 916, teacher wrote:

In post 796, bob3141 wrote:

In post 681, teacher wrote:

In post 569, bob3141 wrote:Taylor-directed post

I dont really like this post and line of thought at someone who hasnt been here, I dont think? Like obviously she hasnt thought about her vote/whether or not it is still RVS/the wagon comp, ya? So why is the tone of this seemingly attacking rather than "so what do you make of that"?

Do you not feel like its a valid question for her when she does come back. Her vote is currently on the leading wagon. Which is just ahead of the wagon that grew shortly after the shelly wagon formed.

I think it’s a valid question, but not a valid framing. The most nested/snipped post read:

wrote: Do you still consider your vote on shelly to be a rvs vote?



Also what do you think of the fact that menal and datisi are both now on that wagon with you. As you raised something about how you didnt like how they townread each other yet were on opposite sides of the noraa v bm.

To me, this somehow gave the impression that Taylor was actively “considering” her vote and ignoring the wagon comp’s inconsistency — that she was willingly voteparking rather than simply being absent.

In post 922, teacher wrote:

In post 897, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 896, Alonzo wrote:Also interested who Taylor , Shelly and TGP think scum on their wagon might be.

not sure as i still have to catch up on 15 pages but theres only 2 votes on me. shelly always scumreads me so thats NAI, and teacher i feel like should be able to see that im town but ??. i havent read why they voted me

I didn’t like either your entry or your absence. It was more of a pressure thing.

In post 925, teacher wrote:

In post 613, Noraa wrote:everyone else is even more meh.

That interchange came before this ya? So why this?

In post 890, Alonzo wrote:

In post 845, Gypyx wrote:

votecount 1.5

Alonzo (0) :

Tayl0r Swift (2) : Shellyc ; Teacher

TheGoldenParadox (3) : Iconeum ; iamausername ; Battle Mage

Iconeum (1) : piisirrational

iamausername (0) :

Datisi (0) :

teacher (0) :

Battle Mage (1) : Noraa

piisirrational (1) : bob3141

bob3141 (1) : Alonzo

shellyc (4) : Tayl0r Swift ; Menalque ; Datisi ; TheGoldenParadox

Exe-3

Noraa (0) :

Menalque (0) :

Not Voting (0) :

With 13 players alive, it takes 7 votes to yeet someone, the day will end in (expired on 2020-10-05 14:15:57)

Random fact : Strawberry, as it name says, isn't a berry

Is this VC up to date?

In post 799, TheGoldenParadox wrote:that being said, shelly is looking worse and worse to me and feels like they're basically blindly following and supporting ico so i'm still inclined to keep my vote where it is

In post 816, Tayl0r Swift wrote:shelly youve scumread me in literally every single game we've been in together i think

In post 830, bob3141 wrote:

In post 696, shellyc wrote:

In post 532, TheGoldenParadox wrote:uhh yeah this post scumpings hard wth
this is basically textbook manipulation VOTE: shelly

golden with this opportunistic wagon hopping

im not getting limmed today, you are

I don't quite see what you mean by opportunistic wagon hopping. Golden comes in with a read that he thinks noraa vs bm is actually svs. So at the point of the nora vote he claims to have scum read on both. And then later he says that he sees Nora as newb town. When he moves his vote to the other player he player he scum read at that point.

And his 3rd vote to you. Do you see all the votes as opportunistic or just the one on you. As that's the vote with least progression before it aswell as the one you quoted.

What i dont get is why the first thing you would think of is that he is being opportunistic. Maybe if it had pushed to l-1 or giving intent on that small post. But l-3 does feel like bit of exaggeration when its only pushed you to l-3. A point its sat at for the last day.
his vote on me is scummy. not noraa vote
like idk it seems like it's not a logical or progressed thought, its just sheeping dats and menal and trying to hop onto and easy miselim
Forgetting that you claiming that you beleive the nature of his vot was opportunistic. what do you think of his read on you?

In post 866, bob3141 wrote:Shelly do you still think both golden and nooraa are scum?

As your voting for taylor over two of your scum reads. Although you voted for taylor you did say you wanted to pressure her at the time. So what do you think of taylors catch up?

In post 935, shellyc wrote:

In post 866, bob3141 wrote:Shelly do you still think both golden and nooraa are scum?

As your voting for taylor over two of your scum reads. Although you voted for taylor you did say you wanted to pressure her at the time. So what do you think of taylors catch up?

taylor worse than noraa and golden
i wanna believe that noraa is LHF

In post 937, shellyc wrote:I mean I do genuinely find you scummy in this position
I don’t really like “untunnel me stop constantly scumreading me”

I’ve also got pings on piirational

In post 937, shellyc wrote:I mean I do genuinely find you scummy in this position
I don’t really like “untunnel me stop constantly scumreading me”

I’ve also got pings on piirational

In post 399, shellyc wrote:still wanna hear an elaboration from taylor regarding that read because it isnt well explained
like ico spent ages trying to discover the TvT-ness of that conflict and I buy it

In post 938, Tayl0r Swift wrote:does that mean that normally when you state a scumread on me it isnt genuine? which of piisirrational's four posts was particularly scummy to you?

In post 942, shellyc wrote:

In post 938, Tayl0r Swift wrote:does that mean that normally when you state a scumread on me it isnt genuine? which of piisirrational's four posts was particularly scummy to you?

no and 220’s just a bunch of IIoA and voting ico instead of voting for their SR (noraa menal)

In post 804, TheGoldenParadox wrote:noraa is low hanging fruit

In post 818, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 361, Iconeum wrote:

In post 219, Datisi wrote:right, nulltown
i just saw him above null and sorted it as townlean

In post 216, Menalque wrote:Serious thoughts on icon reading our PT and not responding to me in it especially after he specifically asked me to play in this game?

level-zero-thinking says kinda sus

for more elaborate thought ask me later

datisi is actually scum

with menal? maybe

even if i was in a pt, datisi would Always be protecting me here because they know

IT'S MY WEEKEND VLA

you just shaded me for my only pings being datisi and menal being scum together, and here you are saying the same thing. boo you.

In post 842, Battle Mage wrote:you're telling me! back in my day, 20 pages would be plenty!

In post 845, Gypyx wrote:shellyc (4) : Tayl0r Swift ; Menalque ; Datisi ; TheGoldenParadox Exe-3