Mafiascum.net

In post 922, Flea The Magician wrote:What reaction were you hoping for?
What did you make of the reaction you got?

i wasn't hoping as much as wondering, it is hard for me to tell how much skitter is considering my play in the past when interacting with me

In post 925, team rocket queen wrote:it is hard for me to tell how much skitter is considering my play in the past when interacting with me

like she called me out for not voting, in addition to dunnstral doing so

and in mystery box g9 i went two day phases without voting except for rvs

and in that game dunnstral replaced skitter, so i can't tell if them pushing me to vote is related to this or not, like if it is a me specific thing or an in general thing,

so i wanted to see if skitter would react to my voting in an alignment indicative way, which to me she didn't

Given Noraa isn't in the game, it's kinda obvious that GLoria was joking about being the hammer.

Glorias confident enough in her read of TGP to place him at E1, and is happy giving me the hammer for whatever reason.

Save me the ISO dive, your vote on TGP is wearing a birthday suit - yet TGP hasn't commented on it. happy to give Dunn a good shove for a vote that's at least wearing a fig leaf in comparison. Any thoughts on why that would be?

PEDIT: But it is a reaction, and after that mech talk started again.
What did you make of the reaction you got?

PEDIT PEDIT: OK, that's fair.

Given you've not placed your vote back, I assume you're not that confident in your read on TGP currently, who else would you consider in the pool for today?

In post 927, Flea The Magician wrote:Given Noraa isn't in the game, it's kinda obvious that GLoria was joking about being the hammer.

i think perhaps obvious to you and obvious to me are not the same thing.

In post 927, Flea The Magician wrote:Any thoughts on why that would be?

because thegoldenparadox does not want to engage with me, i assume. same reason they disengaged from me earlier.

In post 928, Flea The Magician wrote:Given you've not placed your vote back, I assume you're not that confident in your read on TGP currently, who else would you consider in the pool for today?

i don't see the benefit of anyone being at e-1. currently i am most suspicious of thegoldenparadox, gloria cleary, and hopkirk. but it's not like a static thing. why would i be confident now when even the person i think is the most likely to be mafia would still almost always be under 50%?

In post 927, Flea The Magician wrote:after that mech talk started again.

also my read of gypyx isn't mech talk, it comes from the mech talk

In post 929, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 927, Flea The Magician wrote:Given Noraa isn't in the game, it's kinda obvious that GLoria was joking about being the hammer.

i think perhaps obvious to you and obvious to me are not the same thing.

In post 927, Flea The Magician wrote:Any thoughts on why that would be?

because thegoldenparadox does not want to engage with me, i assume. same reason they disengaged from me earlier.

In post 928, Flea The Magician wrote:Given you've not placed your vote back, I assume you're not that confident in your read on TGP currently, who else would you consider in the pool for today?

i don't see the benefit of anyone being at e-1. currently i am most suspicious of thegoldenparadox, gloria cleary, and hopkirk. but it's not like a static thing. why would i be confident now when even the person i think is the most likely to be mafia would still almost always be under 50%?

Fair on the first.

Would you speculate at all on why TGP doesn't want to interact with you? I haven't ISO'd you yet, [you're definitely on my list though], what will I find on you trying to interact with TGP beyond the birthday suit reaction test vote?

*swats* leave hoppy alone Your pool is on a USR, a UTR and Gloria who I think is also pretty town read, nothing wrong with causing a bit of friction.

Let hit some theory
Someone said there's a rule of 3 or something for scum, if 3 or more people are given by scum there's 1 buddy mentioned or something. Based on this supposed rule, there's stronger tells between you and TGP currently. Whats your thoughts on this? (again, this is entirely theoretical and I'm curious about your opinion on this)

In post 930, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 927, Flea The Magician wrote:after that mech talk started again.

also my read of gypyx isn't mech talk, it comes from the mech talk

I don't see the relevance here?

In post 929, team rocket queen wrote:i think perhaps obvious to you and obvious to me are not the same thing.

isis can add me to her 'cognitive load' list if she so wishes

In post 931, Flea The Magician wrote:Would you speculate at all on why TGP doesn't want to interact with you? I haven't ISO'd you yet, [you're definitely on my list though], what will I find on you trying to interact with TGP beyond the birthday suit reaction test vote?

729 and the ten or so posts following.

like mafia indicative reasons would be that their read on me was just to say something and they hadn't thought it through. like i wanted them to go into why they thought i was making my posts kinda the way they did with gypyx, but it felt to me as if they hadn't really considered what i was saying, just saw that i hadn't said "i think x is scum" or "i think x is town" or even just saw other people saying it about me or me saying 'i don't have reads' and like used that. which is also part of why i did that of course even though i had thoughts on the game, to see who would consider what i was saying otherwise and who would just go 'she doesn't have reads!!'

if thegoldenparadox is town they might disengage just to not interact with me. like i can't say this has never happened before.

In post 931, Flea The Magician wrote:Let hit some theory
Someone said there's a rule of 3 or something for scum, if 3 or more people are given by scum there's 1 buddy mentioned or something. Based on this supposed rule, there's stronger tells between you and TGP currently. Whats your thoughts on this? (again, this is entirely theoretical and I'm curious about your opinion on this)

titus says this sometimes! and i quite enjoy titus thoughts especially with regards to how towns should function. i haven't actually done the research to see if it based in any factual evidence though.

In post 932, Flea The Magician wrote:I don't see the relevance here?

because it felt like you were dismissing a read i feel strongly about because it was 'mech talk' even though it wasn't, it just arose out of the mech talk that had occurred earlier

In post 933, team rocket queen wrote:like mafia indicative reasons would be that their read on me was just to say something and they hadn't thought it through. like i wanted them to go into why they thought i was making my posts kinda the way they did with gypyx, but it felt to me as if they hadn't really considered what i was saying, just saw that i hadn't said "i think x is scum" or "i think x is town" or even just saw other people saying it about me or me saying 'i don't have reads' and like used that. which is also part of why i did that of course even though i had thoughts on the game, to see who would consider what i was saying otherwise and who would just go 'she doesn't have reads!!'

which would also lead into like, would they had to have been specifically looking at gypyx iso to make gypyx post if they also had a read on me but they hadn't considered my slot in the same way, which just seems like mafia indicative yeah

In post 931, Flea The Magician wrote:leave hoppy alone

if you could look at 575 and explain it in the context of the skitter/hopkirk interactions surrounding it to me i think that would be productive.

to me it feels like, if i think of each of their statements to eachother in that time period as certain colors, and then close my eyes and try to put them in the right order it comes out differently from how it is

or if it was like tennis it feels like 575 is hopkirk attempting to serve while skitter has the ball

In post 886, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 876, Isis wrote:I don't want to respond to Jessie's last post because I think we might be talking past eachother and I want to start fresh with her.

it's like, hm, okay,

so you say that you think that i am good as mafia:

In post 403, Isis wrote: she's excellent at scum

In post 748, Isis wrote:I think you're great at scumplay

and also that i haven't towntold:

In post 698, Isis wrote:Jessie mostly hasn't towntold yet and has touched on a lot of topics where I'd expect her to have towntold.

but i know that you know that i know what the version of 106 or whatever post that gets me townread looks like

so it feels like that way of trying to read me should be logically inconsistent from your pov? but idk if that's alignment indicative

like had i taken the setup speculation to extremes would you have thought, ah yes she is town?

Hm. I might be projecting Jessie. I also think I'm good at scum, but as I've told Hectic before, I usually don't know what to post that will get me townread when I play scum. I only know what to post that won't get me scumread.

I don't have a thorough understanding of why you're good at scum or how your strengths work, I just know I saw you win a hard lobby, and it wasn't one of those cases were several townies acted it in a wonky manner that made it super clear why they became miseliminations. The other thing is having an emotional relationship with mafia that works in your favor, probably as both alignments (I think you get emotional about games, but you don't get emotional about some aspects of it that others do, and those are the things where it's a detriment)

If Flea is a diva can we book them to perform at the wedding? I'm ok with them having multiple roles.

(squeaky toy noise)

In post 936, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 931, Flea The Magician wrote:leave hoppy alone

if you could look at 575 and explain it in the context of the skitter/hopkirk interactions surrounding it to me i think that would be productive.

to me it feels like, if i think of each of their statements to eachother in that time period as certain colors, and then close my eyes and try to put them in the right order it comes out differently from how it is

or if it was like tennis it feels like 575 is hopkirk attempting to serve while skitter has the ball

I think 575 was like, “I know you wanted to engage with me, I have to go now here’s when I can do it in real time”. I think hopkirk saw skitter posting and didn’t want her to be confused when he left for a bit.

flea feels pure of heart with their interrogation

I feel like if I had to explain why I townread Flea I would be profoundly embarrassed yet feel I had not right to be embarrassed, like a parent who is asked about their favorite piece of art in all the world, and has to pull a sheet of paper covered in glitter, stickers, and fingerpaint off the front of the fridge because anything else would be dishonest

that's a good ninjapost too

In post 933, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 929, team rocket queen wrote:i think perhaps obvious to you and obvious to me are not the same thing.

isis can add me to her 'cognitive load' list if she so wishes

*blinks in dumbass* ... huh?

In post 933, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 931, Flea The Magician wrote:Would you speculate at all on why TGP doesn't want to interact with you? I haven't ISO'd you yet, [you're definitely on my list though], what will I find on you trying to interact with TGP beyond the birthday suit reaction test vote?

729 and the ten or so posts following.

like mafia indicative reasons would be that their read on me was just to say something and they hadn't thought it through. like i wanted them to go into why they thought i was making my posts kinda the way they did with gypyx, but it felt to me as if they hadn't really considered what i was saying, just saw that i hadn't said "i think x is scum" or "i think x is town" or even just saw other people saying it about me or me saying 'i don't have reads' and like used that. which is also part of why i did that of course even though i had thoughts on the game, to see who would consider what i was saying otherwise and who would just go 'she doesn't have reads!!'

if thegoldenparadox is town they might disengage just to not interact with me. like i can't say this has never happened before.

Fair, good response.

In post 933, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 931, Flea The Magician wrote:Let hit some theory
Someone said there's a rule of 3 or something for scum, if 3 or more people are given by scum there's 1 buddy mentioned or something. Based on this supposed rule, there's stronger tells between you and TGP currently. Whats your thoughts on this? (again, this is entirely theoretical and I'm curious about your opinion on this)

titus says this sometimes! and i quite enjoy titus thoughts especially with regards to how towns should function. i haven't actually done the research to see if it based in any factual evidence though.

Thats why its theory You're a well respected player for your scum game it seems so you're a good candidate to discuss this with.

In post 934, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 932, Flea The Magician wrote:I don't see the relevance here?

because it felt like you were dismissing a read i feel strongly about because it was 'mech talk' even though it wasn't, it just arose out of the mech talk that had occurred earlier

Not at all, your read on gypx may be useful later, but considering it now would be to grasp at straws and trying to speedrun a dot to dot.

In post 935, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 933, team rocket queen wrote:like mafia indicative reasons would be that their read on me was just to say something and they hadn't thought it through. like i wanted them to go into why they thought i was making my posts kinda the way they did with gypyx, but it felt to me as if they hadn't really considered what i was saying, just saw that i hadn't said "i think x is scum" or "i think x is town" or even just saw other people saying it about me or me saying 'i don't have reads' and like used that. which is also part of why i did that of course even though i had thoughts on the game, to see who would consider what i was saying otherwise and who would just go 'she doesn't have reads!!'

which would also lead into like, would they had to have been specifically looking at gypyx iso to make gypyx post if they also had a read on me but they hadn't considered my slot in the same way, which just seems like mafia indicative yeah

I haven't looked fully at gypvx yet, so this isn't really an area of my concern for the moment. They are on my list however and have been looked at briefly in connection to TGP.

In post 942, Isis wrote:I feel like if I had to explain why I townread Flea I would be profoundly embarrassed yet feel I had not right to be embarrassed, like a parent who is asked about their favorite piece of art in all the world, and has to pull a sheet of paper covered in glitter, stickers, and fingerpaint off the front of the fridge because anything else would be dishonest

<3 this post

I am disappointed Isis hasn't asked me to go skydiving with her yet.

o( ❛ᴗ❛ )o My reads so far Pt.3 o( ❛ᴗ❛ )o


(ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧ Special ☆ ～('▽^人)

Isis



٩(｡•́‿•̀｡)۶ Town-Friends (≧◡≦)

Ydrasse
Gloria
Tweetie
Flea The Magician

\(^ヮ^)/ Positive-Null \(^ヮ^)/

Hopkirk
skitter30
team rocket queen
Infinity 324

＼(º □ º l|l)/ Nullish ＼(º □ º l|l)/

Dunnstral


(￣ヘ￣)Suspicious(￣ヘ￣)

Gypyx
TheGoldenParadox

Pooky you have told me you would go skydiving with me without a parachute; that doesn't actually make me want to go skydiving with you

what makes gypyx scummy?