Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:07 am
like if Noraa is scum here she's playing suicidal and it doesn't make any sense
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
dunno what else you except from someone with a 3 month join date but if ur solution is just "PL all newbies", ur the silly one.In post 913, VP Baltar wrote:You understand how silly this post is, right?In post 911, Noraa wrote:Kinda rude for u to say that. ur basically just justifying a vote on me as a Pl and *assuming* all 4 are town.In post 909, VP Baltar wrote:My gut says gamma is more scummy overall, but if we do have a four town situation, I think Noraa is less utility because I don't read Cakez as scum at all right now and she seems keyed up to auto challenge him.
Ur like gamma is scummier but Noraa is more negative utility to town. Hence justifying ur vote on both largest wagons of the day.
Maybe I can see
Vp/Notsci/Cake/__
I mean, you're saying I'm justifying my vote when you literally said you'd yeet anyone who isn't you, nbd.
This is why I'm saying if you're town, you're pretty low utility. I tried to work with you and you came up with a harebrained theory that I'm scum because of that. It's not a town mentality. I honestly feel bad if you eat a lot of D1 yeets, but if this is your town play....what do you expect to happen?
wat so u TR me now?In post 916, Untrod Tripod wrote:*gestures vaguely in the direction of the concept that people tend to like people who act like they do*In post 915, VP Baltar wrote:I don't understand townreading noraa over pooky here
Maybe a better term was I SL all of them.In post 919, lilith2013 wrote:??? Here’s the post you made:In post 755, Noraa wrote:Oh I SRed all three of them at the time that I made that post.In post 731, lilith2013 wrote:I’m planning on rereading gamma in the context of VP’s points against him but have to do work so hopefully later today
Also I reeeeeally don’t like noraa’s posts being like “this is why the other people in the pool are scummier than me” but not actually scumreading any of themwhich implies that you didn’t have a firm scumread onIn post 714, Noraa wrote:In the current bracket, im not sure who is scum or if there even is scum.anyof them, let alone all of them, and now you’re trying to make it seem like that post saying you’d vote anyone wasn’t sketchy af
Town!cake doesn't act this calm and composed. It just doesn't happen.In post 921, SirCakez wrote:you're so confibiased it's unreal
maybe instead of doing mental gymnastics to somehow confirm to yourself that I'm scum why not just look at the obvious and realize I'm not voting you because I'm not scum and I'm not scumreading you
when I'm not being fuckwagoned to elim on day 1 then yeah I don't get pissy lolIn post 928, Noraa wrote:Town!cake doesn't act this calm and composed. It just doesn't happen.In post 921, SirCakez wrote:you're so confibiased it's unreal
maybe instead of doing mental gymnastics to somehow confirm to yourself that I'm scum why not just look at the obvious and realize I'm not voting you because I'm not scum and I'm not scumreading you
I am not a meta expert but when someone is far out of their town range, I can see it.
First, you've played many games, so spare me the I'm a newbie crap.In post 926, Noraa wrote:dunno what else you except from someone with a 3 month join date but if ur solution is just "PL all newbies", ur the silly one.
Quantity =/= Quality lol.In post 930, VP Baltar wrote:First, you've played many games, so spare me the I'm a newbie crap.
Second, that isn't my policy at all. In fact, I probably give newer players too much benefit of the doubt, aka me letting stuff slide for you in mafiaSunny
Quote ANY evidence of this from any other game for me pleaseIn post 931, Noraa wrote:No no. Cake is scum. Clear as day.
He doesn't talk logic to me if he's town. He just tunnels me if he's town. This calmness is just not town!cake and I won't believe otherwise.
This calmness wasn't present in Betrayal. I can't provide other games yet.In post 933, SirCakez wrote:Quote ANY evidence of this from any other game for me pleaseIn post 931, Noraa wrote:No no. Cake is scum. Clear as day.
He doesn't talk logic to me if he's town. He just tunnels me if he's town. This calmness is just not town!cake and I won't believe otherwise.
if they read the last Hidden Temple game, the scum team would know that it's very beneficial in this setup to bus the absolute shit out of someone. at 8:4 it's pretty unlikely to get all misyeets, so preparing for and executing a bus when the time comes would be essential to make it to endgame as a team. a suicidal scum makes perfect sense to me as a person who has played scum in this setup.In post 925, SirCakez wrote:like if Noraa is scum here she's playing suicidal and it doesn't make any sense
she plays like this all the time? jesus christ.In post 924, SirCakez wrote:when I see actual scum motivation and not just Noraa's typical AtE biased flailIn post 922, Untrod Tripod wrote:at what point for you does the preponderance of weird/bad posts become scummy?
how in the heck could the post you quoted possibly mean that?In post 926, Noraa wrote:In post 916, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 915, VP Baltar wrote:
I don't understand townreading noraa over pooky here
*gestures vaguely in the direction of the concept that people tend to like people who act like they do*
wat so u TR me now?
meta is trashIn post 928, Noraa wrote:Town!cake doesn't act this calm and composed. It just doesn't happen.In post 921, SirCakez wrote:you're so confibiased it's unreal
maybe instead of doing mental gymnastics to somehow confirm to yourself that I'm scum why not just look at the obvious and realize I'm not voting you because I'm not scum and I'm not scumreading you
I am not a meta expert but when someone is far out of their town range, I can see it.
In post 936, SirCakez wrote:Your one game of (bad) evidence is making you 100% sure I'm scum?
Noraa wrote:Soul reads work like that.
lolNoraa wrote:they don't need much evidence. After all they are entirely based on feeling/vibes.
It does not strike me as odd. It's Day 1. He clearly doesn't see it as a priority.In post 904, Gamma Emerald wrote:would it not do to shore that read up though? It's the same issue I brought up regarding baltar where the solving is not present imo
Of the four, I find Gamma's sustained behavior most likely to come from scum. I could see an argument for Pooky gambitting with the autochallenge, but the followup hasn't given me those vibes. VPB has been, to me, the most logically consistent all throughout. Noraa I still get townvibes from overall. Haven't loved recent posting, but most of it I can chalk up to some level of frustration. A little concerned about VPB's statement of inconsistencies between PT and this thread, and there's been some recent alarm bells, but I'm not close to switching.In post 906, Untrod Tripod wrote:AGar, why the Gamma vote?
I loathe this post. I hate the intentional misconstruing of 909, and the attempt at a solve that follows.In post 911, Noraa wrote:Kinda rude for u to say that. ur basically just justifying a vote on me as a Pl and *assuming* all 4 are town.In post 909, VP Baltar wrote:My gut says gamma is more scummy overall, but if we do have a four town situation, I think Noraa is less utility because I don't read Cakez as scum at all right now and she seems keyed up to auto challenge him.
Ur like gamma is scummier but Noraa is more negative utility to town. Hence justifying ur vote on both largest wagons of the day.
Maybe I can see
Vp/Notsci/Cake/__
is this actually new terminologyIn post 937, Noraa wrote:Soul reads work like that.
okay but I don't think it's gonna happenIn post 943, AGar wrote:Of the four, I find Gamma's sustained behavior most likely to come from scum
but gamma is in the pool?In post 946, Untrod Tripod wrote:okay but I don't think it's gonna happenIn post 943, AGar wrote:Of the four, I find Gamma's sustained behavior most likely to come from scum
isn't it wild how some of the people actually up for yeeting today want us to spend all of our time talking about people we can't yeet, our reads on whom will depend on today's flip?
really make u think