Mafiascum.net

@Toog, why did you roleblock nomnomnom instead of letting him resolve?

In post 924, Titus wrote:

In post 918, Toogeloo wrote:At what point did you start town-reading nom³, Titus?

I'm not sure exactly when I did. At first, I was looking for this that would refute his claim, but I didn't find any.

I also struggled with how opportunistic the day feels.

Nomnomnom posting this way is generally consistent.

Why were you looking for things that would refute his claim?

Miller D2 seems plenty to me.

Why did you ask me to hold off until Tuesday while still voting Nom?

In post 926, MathBlade wrote:Why were you looking for things that would refute his claim?

Miller D2 seems plenty to me.

Why did you ask me to hold off until Tuesday while still voting Nom?

If nomnomnom's claim was proven bullshit, we could get a turbolim there and I'd feel confident it was the right play.

I wanted time to get caught up psychologically. I had read but I wanted to look deeper.

That bar is literally impossible short of a day cop.
You know this.
I am feeling Titus + nom hard and Titus is moving way down in my rankings.
I don’t buy this explanation at all.
You said holiday now it’s “look psychologically” whatever that means.

I am kinda feeling all scum in (nom,DGB,A50,Titus) right now.

Nom’s claim is so preposterous and instead of doing what’s probable you’re doing what’s possible.

Day 2 VC #11

DrippingGoofball (1): nomnomnom (818)
Xlos (2): WhemeStar (654), Titus (885)
Almost50 (2): Xlos (765), Galron (862)
Jake the Wolfie (0):
MathBlade (0):
Titus (0):
WhemeStar (1): Almost50 (870)

nomnomnom (4) (F-2): DrippingGoofball (466), Toogeloo (670), T3 (671), MathBlade (905)

Not Voting (1): Jake the Wolfie (665)

You’ve had two days pushing on a third and for what?
The only memorable thing is A50’s fishing shit show.

What exactly are you doing?

Because right now I am really regretting not just hammering when I could have.

I guess if you’re scum it helped fix my read of you so bonus?

In post 928, MathBlade wrote:You said holiday now it’s “look psychologically” whatever that means.

Are you claiming that Titus is lying about needing a break to psycologically catch up? Are you really about to commit to fact that Titus is lying about her mental state just to get away from a game?

In post 776, Titus wrote:

In post 775, Galron wrote:There are too many non-voters.

Why? I don't feel inclined to vote anyone until Tuesday or unless I get more time to get thoughts going.

@A50/MathBlade, I see you both there.

@A50, What are your thoughts of Xlos trying to get everyone to claim what branch of math we were?

Jake, I read this as wanting time for the holiday as my previous response.
Her response now seems to be that she wants to read people psychologically whatever that means.
No I would never denigrate mental health of a persons specifically.
I'm sorry if it came off like that.

</hyperventilate>

What are your reads Jake?

I wanted to take the holiday to look deeper at things psychologically. It's literally the same thing.

Okay…then you should be able to explain what you’ve seen so far. Give me something you’re learning. What things have you pushed for or attempted to learn?

Do you want a recap of the thread since Saturday?

I feel like I've learned quite a lot.

In post 934, MathBlade wrote:What are your reads Jake?

This game is quite hard to read. DGB and Nom decided to get into a tuef war, then A50 and Toog decided to shake things up by straight up claiming.

I'm a little put out of this game because players are claiming for the hell of it.

I don't trust that DGB's claim is entirely true, and I don't believe they targetted Nom.
Nom played this bad, and is probably scum.
Toog is probably scum with Nom.
A50 is just ???

Overall, I don't get good vibes from.. anyone, really. All of y'all are scum, and I'm the only townie.

In post 937, Titus wrote:Do you want a recap of the thread since Saturday?

I feel like I've learned quite a lot.

I’d love it from your POV yes.

I’ve only been asking a while now.

And damn Jake that’s like the towniest thing you’ve said I like it. Keep it up please

In post 925, Titus wrote:@Toog, why did you roleblock nomnomnom instead of letting him resolve?

I found it suspicious that anyone who is town would openly claim they could use a role after meeting conditions on Day 1. Town would likely fear a blocking mechanic from scum more than scum would fear one from town.

In post 939, MathBlade wrote:

In post 937, Titus wrote:Do you want a recap of the thread since Saturday?

I feel like I've learned quite a lot.

I’d love it from your POV yes.

I’ve only been asking a while now.

And damn Jake that’s like the towniest thing you’ve said I like it. Keep it up please

DGB likely checked nom and got a result.
I like nomnomnom defense.
I find Toog's play around nomnomnom weird. Why block someone who is obviously limited action (if he believed nomnomnom at the time)? Why shade me for discrediting nomnomnom for asking basic questions?
Xlos's flavor positions don't make any sense.
T3 is likely town for events prior to the thread.
Whemestar is just out of it. I don't like it but I am inclined to give a pass for today bc T3.
Jake's kinda there.
Math is giving a pass to Jake because he can agree with their S v S theory (normal) but giving Xlos a pass when he's voting A50 doesn't make sense.
I feel Galron is town but I need to sort him more.

Argh nom is scum

An ungated friendly neighbor who is also a miller and gains STILL SECRET additional powers on prime day ends that are POORLY defined

And was oh so conveniently roleblocked

And OH claimed miller after I softed a guilty

IS LYING SCUM

It's all laid bare right in front of us

In post 942, DrippingGoofball wrote:Argh nom is scum

An ungated friendly neighbor who is also a miller and gains STILL SECRET additional powers on prime day ends that are POORLY defined

And was oh so conveniently roleblocked

And OH claimed miller after I softed a guilty

IS LYING SCUM

It's all laid bare right in front of us

The way I understand it is that nomnomnom can only act on prime ends, not that he gets additional power from prime ends.

In post 943, Titus wrote:The way I understand it is that nomnomnom can only act on prime ends, not that he gets additional power from prime ends.

correct

In post 940, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 925, Titus wrote:@Toog, why did you roleblock nomnomnom instead of letting him resolve?

I found it suspicious that anyone who is town would openly claim they could use a role after meeting conditions on Day 1. Town would likely fear a blocking mechanic from scum more than scum would fear one from town.

If nom is scum and scum has a roleblocker... maybe not!!!

In post 944, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 943, Titus wrote:The way I understand it is that nomnomnom can only act on prime ends, not that he gets additional power from prime ends.

correct

Oh well that's new

The claim changed again thanks to Titus feeding answers.

In post 945, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 940, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 925, Titus wrote:@Toog, why did you roleblock nomnomnom instead of letting him resolve?

I found it suspicious that anyone who is town would openly claim they could use a role after meeting conditions on Day 1. Town would likely fear a blocking mechanic from scum more than scum would fear one from town.

If nom is scum and scum has a roleblocker... maybe not!!!

Or maybe nom is town and scum jumped at the chance to roleblock someone who said they weren't VT.

Scum team is Titus, Toogeloo and Nom, I rest my case.

In post 946, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 944, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 943, Titus wrote:The way I understand it is that nomnomnom can only act on prime ends, not that he gets additional power from prime ends.

correct

Oh well that's new

The claim changed again thanks to Titus feeding answers.

Where did he say it the other way?