Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2021 4:11 am
boop
I don’t know how to feel about you constantly prodding people on me, you seem quite invested in your TR on meIn post 780, the worst wrote:hey house. who are gamma's partners?
I don’t think that it’s spammy though? And it’s content even if it’s not what’s traditional content. I don’t want to vote out someone like that today.In post 923, Titus wrote:In post 872, House wrote:That shit was setup spec.In post 868, Something_Smart wrote:Did it not bother you the first four times he did that?
I'm less than clueless about setup spec in this game.
Activity theorizing, however, I'm very familiar with. I'm a spammy motherfucker as either alignment and have always been that way, so it's something i see a lot of discussion about.Bee, being spammy with no content is suggestive of scum. We don't need an ironclad case D1 just >rand scum.In post 891, Bee wrote::/
I think voting Thor is a bad idea unless someone has a case other than busywork/not normal content. Like, is the information being put forward actually being used maliciously or anything?
Oh cool, you're town!In post 925, PenguinPower wrote:boop
Literally not what I’m doing, and you’ve refused to engage me when I’ve said that before so until you do I’m taking it as willful ignorance.In post 788, House wrote:So, yeah, go ahead and eliminate me based off of outside influence. Because that's totally within the rules.
Sure, as I said, I'm always happy to discuss specifics.In post 912, Flea The Magician wrote:Thats why I'm hard-engaging you here. Because I want to squeeze it out of you.
Tension produces more content - would you agree?Something_Smart wrote:I'm not convinced that speeding up the game or pressuring are worthy goals. (This is why I vote so little in the first place.)
:/In post 924, Something_Smart wrote:Moderate scum off of draft position + your posts have done nothing to reverse it.In post 921, Bee wrote:What’s your read on me?
Hey, what am I, chopped liver?In post 915, Something_Smart wrote:But I've been asked this before. Usually the reasons are something something wagon analysis something accountability but I've never seen anyone draw any productive information out of a vote that I placed on request.
Enchant or H and HIn post 927, Bee wrote:Who else would you want to vote?
Solid choiceIn post 933, Titus wrote:Enchant
How were you “fast with townreads”?
Bringing it up to give evidence of the human element, because frankly I ain't a normal human. You look at the list, and think about what you would pick, then compare to what I'd narrowed my options to - bearing in mind even if I was the first to pick, that would be my pool.In post 911, Bee wrote:Wait what does your role and what you wanted have anything to do with this, like, offhandedly bringing this up?In post 899, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm starting to lean that way.In post 885, Something_Smart wrote:Do you think it's scummy?In post 880, Flea The Magician wrote:OK this is absolutely busywork and some weird ass BS.
I love mech spec, and if you look at the style of games I play I tend to go for mech heavy or bastard games. Looking at the games I've run (all 2 of them - still need an outside reviewer for the second) you can see I love mech weirdness.
If you want me to get down and dirty in the mech here, I can and I will, but the conclsion is always going to be the same. The human element alone here is enough to throw the spec out of the window.
I can tell you what my options were that I was going to choose from, and few people will actually believe me because of how I approach these games.
I was looking at PGO, Vengeful and Universial Backup. I'm not going to say what I actually selected but I was looking at those as I sent my number in.
Your vote on Thor was :/ to me because I see him as you in Yin and Yang where everyone jumped on you for not playing the game the same way. What differences do you see in your play there and what’s happening now?
I mentioned what I did in response to this. For no other reason.In post 385, House wrote:He never rushes to make these kinds of calls on me when he's town.
... OR TOWN.In post 930, Harvey and Haley wrote:It's difficult to act perfectly naturally when it looks like the game is headed in the wrong direction for you as scum
True, but I'd rather sift through <Earnest town unnatural play vs Scum panic play> as opposed to <town chilling vs scum chilling>.In post 940, House wrote:... OR TOWN.In post 930, Harvey and Haley wrote:It's difficult to act perfectly naturally when it looks like the game is headed in the wrong direction for you as scum
PR's have motive to stay alive too, especially on D1.
How can you categorize earnest & unnatural together? That doesn't make any sense.In post 943, Harvey and Haley wrote:True, but I'd rather sift through <Earnest town unnatural play vs Scum panic play> as opposed to <town chilling vs scum chilling>.In post 940, House wrote:... OR TOWN.In post 930, Harvey and Haley wrote:It's difficult to act perfectly naturally when it looks like the game is headed in the wrong direction for you as scum
PR's have motive to stay alive too, especially on D1.
-Harvey
Sometimes, but it's not alwaysIn post 930, Harvey and Haley wrote:Tension produces more content - would you agree?
Yes. However it is also difficult to act in a way as town that doesn't make people suspicious that this is happening. Particularly the type of people who are prone to getting pressured are often also the type of people that do weird things or freak out under pressure.It's difficult to act perfectly naturally when it looks like the game is headed in the wrong direction for you as scum - would you agree to this?
What about what, your posts?In post 931, Bee wrote:What about them though?
Have you done that? Sorry if I forgot. What game was it?In post 932, Titus wrote:Hey, what am I, chopped liver?
We're thinking of variant definitions for "natural", I guess. I mean in the sense of deviating from how you'd play without pressure. I believe that deviations in town play and scum play, while both might be different from usual under pressure, have differences in that town know they're being wrongly limmed.In post 944, House wrote:How can you categorize earnest & unnatural together? That doesn't make any sense.
I feel like when I’m scum I end up refreshing the page when I post something I’m worried might not go over wellIn post 858, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Some scum can also be scared of opinions of their posts after they post