Mafiascum.net

In post 921, Datisi wrote:so i'm not yet openwolfing hard enough for you to consider yeeting me? noted

it's not just that, it's also the usage of "hip-shot" wording (yes, in fact, i am aware that suspecting someone for reusing a phase they once used in a game of mafia like a year ago is bonkers, shut the fuck up), and the fact you made sure to say the word "notes" twice

and it's like

if you're scum, obviously you want me to townread you. but, you know that those tiny bits of my "things that town!vp does" list won't help you because we both know they're on that list. bUT ALSO, you know that i know that. so now i'm like, would scum!baltar purposefully drop these little hints, *knowing* that i'm gonna notice them and start losing sleep over them, in order to get into my head?

because i know how much you wanna fool me, but my issue is, like, in the times when i first noticed you doing these tells, they felt more natural. like it made sense for you to bring up notes at the time in oligarchy or guardians because you were catching up on a lot. but here, they were mentioned in the context of a readslist from a half-shitposty first 10 pages of a game. and the "changing votes" thing, originally they were said with much more confidence and self-assurance that i've noticed town!baltar has, while here they just feel said to make sure they've been said

In post 925, Nordom wrote:I didn't think Daitsi would expose themselves so easily in going for the popular lynch once again.

In post 927, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 925, Nordom wrote:I didn't think Daitsi would expose themselves so easily in going for the popular lynch once again.

Are you going to vote me yet?

In post 928, Nordom wrote:Long posts that require doesn't necessarily equal town. Just want to get that on the record.

In post 927, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 925, Nordom wrote:I didn't think Daitsi would expose themselves so easily in going for the popular lynch once again.

Are you going to vote me yet?

In post 913, Datisi wrote:

In post 727, Nordom wrote:

In post 726, VP Baltar wrote:What's the bullet point case on datisi again?

Basically, Daitisi was one to throw their hat into the popular pressure of Wu and Monkey. It just came off as lazy and convenient to me.

that's not my name

did you actually read this game or did you just read a bad cliffnotes version in the scum pt? i said that i find monkey scummy on the surface but that i'm aware it doesn't automatically make him scum since i know he's better than that. and i agreed with generalwu's iso being bad. that's it. this post is kinda implying that i did not do anything else this game up until that point (due to the "lazy" comment), which like??? push on tenebro? push on skitter? HE-LLO?

In post 736, Nordom wrote:Pressure, throwing shade, what does it matter? My point is that he felt to give attention to him when Monkey was an obvious player of contention. If it were a "passing observation" it'd be one thing, but he felt that he had to get involved in the process with the pressure on Monkey. It wouldn't be such a red flag with me, but Datisi was also involved with the shit with Wu, which I felt was a weak push in the first place.

lol the backpedalling

again, i said the shitty iso up until that point didn't make him scum (he probably is scum, but not because of that part). and where did i "get involved"? i had like, at most ONE post on generalwu, and that post happened after i got shit for

ignoring

nero's case on wu! like

In post 932, Datisi wrote:

In post 927, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 925, Nordom wrote:I didn't think Daitsi would expose themselves so easily in going for the popular lynch once again.

Are you going to vote me yet?

he doesn't even know my name and he's not bothering to even read my responses, instead just going "datisi scum tho", of course he won't

In post 934, Nordom wrote:Why are you appealing to VP though?

In post 935, Datisi wrote:"datisi is going for popular wagons of wu and monkey"

"that's wrong, i was going after tene and skitt, and i was the first on both of those wagons. and, i specifically said monkey's posting doesn't make him town, and i commented about wu *after being asked to*, so what you on about?"

"datisi failed spectacularly"

lol

In post 936, Datisi wrote:

In post 934, Nordom wrote:Why are you appealing to VP though?

because he's around and he is actually reading the game

In post 939, Datisi wrote:you did not, but for the record, where is that "explanation" so that i can point out why you're full of shit?

In post 937, Nordom wrote:I think you're deliberately trying to discredit me here, which town would not do!

In post 941, Datisi wrote:

In post 937, Nordom wrote:I think you're deliberately trying to discredit me here, which town would not do!

town that's currently a leading wagon who's being wagoned for nonsense would not try to discredit someone who continuously makes bad faith arguments at them and refuses to actually explain their "thought process"! y'all heard it here first, folks!

In post 940, Nordom wrote:

In post 939, Datisi wrote:you did not, but for the record, where is that "explanation" so that i can point out why you're full of shit?

I'm really this hard mafia to you?

In post 944, Nordom wrote:Although, I am curious here. If Datisi maf, why decide to push on me? Did they believe I was some noob that could get punted aside or is this a genuine town?

In post 710, Nordom wrote:

In post 708, Yeet wrote:It is interesting that Datisi is pretty much universally very unpopular today (except in Aristeia’s eyes, but I worry she may be biased. Nevertheless I am still keeping her opinion very much in mind because I presume she knows him well).

Is he normally this unpopular at gamestart?

Why is it interesting? I would say Wu and Monkey have gotten more shade thrown on them than Daitisi has.

In post 493, Nordom wrote:Alright, this wagon on Wu feels pretty weak. You can argue that "Well, they haven't really scumhunted, they've lurked, and yadda yadda yadda", but I mean it hasn't even been 24 hours since this game skyrocketed into an absurd twenty pages. Not to mention, I'm getting some opportunistic vibes going on with these votes.

VOTE: Daitisi

Content to just push on players who are getting attention thrown their way and I haven't really gotten the impression that it's a town tell of "Pressuring for information" from them.

In post 727, Nordom wrote:

In post 726, VP Baltar wrote:What's the bullet point case on datisi again?

Basically, Daitisi was one to throw their hat into the popular pressure of Wu and Monkey. It just came off as lazy and convenient to me.

In post 740, Nordom wrote:Wu needs to step the fuck up and start contributing to the game.

In post 868, Nordom wrote:

In post 865, DeasVail wrote:

In post 727, Nordom wrote:

In post 726, VP Baltar wrote:What's the bullet point case on datisi again?

Basically, Daitisi was one to throw their hat into the popular pressure of Wu and Monkey. It just came off as lazy and convenient to me.

I kind of feel like you've done the same with the pressure of Datisi

I'm not so sure about that. I think I may have been the first one to vote Datisi.

In post 854, skitter30 wrote:- this thing with nordam is probably a miscommunication/having different priorities to sort people. I dont really get what he's asking but probably isnt scummy

In post 946, Datisi wrote:

In post 944, Nordom wrote:Although, I am curious here. If Datisi maf, why decide to push on me? Did they believe I was some noob that could get punted aside or is this a genuine town?

what happened do me being scum who's going for all the easiest votes?

and i'm not answering that until you point out where you explained the wu/monkey thing. good faith needs to go both ways, sorry.