Mafiascum.net

I also loved this one:

In post 917, marcistar wrote:i mean, theres a difference between the games but whatever

Weird, the circumstances of the games explain the differences I saw.

Yet, I didn't scumread her in Eurybia for those differences. I townread her.

In post 912, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 881, RH9 wrote:

In post 880, marcistar wrote:what posts

840 and 844
He showed active attempts to solve and sort players in those posts.

I think this is overstated

OK.
It was a bit but I still think that STD is putting in a lot of effort in solving.

RH9, any thoughts on 923 and 925?

In post 927, Faker wrote:RH9, any thoughts on 923 and 925?

I think that the quoted posts in 923 from marci are unusual because she seems to be TRing STD for his interactions with you. But outside of those interactions, it seems that there isn't much reason why he's being TRed.
I'm not sure about 925 though marci seems mildly defensive in the quoted post. Though, I'm not sure if that is AI.

I think there's a little further to go in 925 that I did not make more implicit.

If this is true: I know marcistar is town in this game + I notice the differences in Eurybia (which marcistar agrees exist) -> I'd have scumread marcistar in Eurybia for those differences.

Then: I didn't scumread marcistar in Eurybia -> I either didn't notice the differences between the games, or .

Her saying "The games are circumstantially different!" is not the defense she thinks it is.

This isn't 100% airtight and there are other possibilities, but I hope the simplification helps illustrate my point. (ex. There is also no evidence in Eurybia that I based my read on this game at all, as it should be. I also might have noticed marcistar was town in Eurybia despite the differences, then move to exploit them.)

that I did not make more explicit*

In post 929, Faker wrote:I think there's a little further to go in 925 that I did not make more implicit.

If this is true: I know marcistar is town in this game + I notice the differences in Eurybia (which marcistar agrees exist) -> I'd have scumread marcistar in Eurybia for those differences.

Then: I didn't scumread marcistar in Eurybia -> I either didn't notice the differences between the games, or

I instead knew that marcistar isn't town this game

.

Her saying "The games are circumstantially different!" is not the defense she thinks it is.

This isn't 100% airtight and there are other possibilities, but I hope the simplification helps illustrate my point. (ex. There is also no evidence in Eurybia that I based my read on this game at all, as it should be. I also might have noticed marcistar was town in Eurybia despite the differences, then move to exploit them.)

I see.
This makes more sense now. It also weakens her defence.

I've got a few ideas for candidate meta-tells for RH9 but I'm probably going to wait until tomorrow. Like I said I'm tired after that slog through Eurybia and want a break.

I liked Dwlee99's last explanation about the minigames.

??

"not the defence i think it is"?

??

??

??

??

the fuck are you on rn?

In post 929, Faker wrote:If this is true: I know marcistar is town in this game + I notice the differences in Eurybia (which marcistar agrees exist) -> I'd have scumread marcistar in Eurybia for those differences.

Then: I didn't scumread marcistar in Eurybia -> I either didn't notice the differences between the games, or

I instead knew that marcistar isn't town this game

.

Her saying "The games are circumstantially different!" is not the defense she thinks it is.

This isn't 100% airtight and there are other possibilities, but I hope the simplification helps illustrate my point. (ex. There is also no evidence in Eurybia that I based my read on this game at all, as it should be. I also might have noticed marcistar was town in Eurybia despite the differences, then move to exploit them.)

they different circumstances

why did you bring up eurybia if you weren't trying to use it to push ur point along?

u KNOW my gamestyle is all over the place prism

In post 932, Faker wrote:I liked Dwlee99's last explanation about the minigames.

Me too.
914 made me flip my read.
I think that Dwlee's explanation is sound and in addition to 914, they are showing that they want to solve and help Town sort.

lol @ 933

In post 934, RH9 wrote:

In post 932, Faker wrote:I liked Dwlee99's last explanation about the minigames.

Me too.
915 made me flip my read.
I think that Dwlee's explanation is sound and in addition to 914, they are showing that they want to solve and help Town sort.

EBWOP

In post 936, RH9 wrote:

In post 934, RH9 wrote:

In post 932, Faker wrote:I liked Dwlee99's last explanation about the minigames.

Me too.
914 made me flip my read.
I think that Dwlee's explanation is sound and in addition to 913, they are showing that they want to solve and help Town sort.

EBWOP

My memory is failing me.

In post 937, RH9 wrote:

In post 936, RH9 wrote:

In post 934, RH9 wrote:

In post 932, Faker wrote:I liked Dwlee99's last explanation about the minigames.

Me too.
914 made me flip my read.
I think that Dwlee's explanation is sound and in addition to 912, they are showing that they want to solve and help Town sort.

EBWOP

My memory is failing me.

EBWOP again.
Sorry.

In post 697, marcistar wrote:i still think rh9 is thinking of things backwards,

clearly faker is just egging them on.

I'm really undecided if posts like this, and all the "Faker is buddying you!" posts are +town for RH9 or +scum for RH9.

Similar to how I don't need to convince RH9 I'm town as scum, marcistar doesn't have to either.

In post 939, Faker wrote: Similar to how I don't need to convince RH9 I'm town as scum, marcistar doesn't have to either.

Unless she somehow thinks that I can influence MD.
Which she hasn't really said so far.
So best case scenario, it's NAI.

My concern is more that she's phoned it in on MD in the hopes of making Dragons look bad and you look good.

Question for the well-rested Faker of tomorrow, though. I find it hard to turn my brain off but I really don't want to go meta-diving you right now to see if I can figure you out that way.

In post 941, Faker wrote:My concern is more that she's phoned it in on MD in the hopes of making Dragons look bad and you look good.

Question for the well-rested Faker of tomorrow, though. I find it hard to turn my brain off but I really don't want to go meta-diving you right now to see if I can figure you out that way.

I see.
Have a good night.

Sillyposting

won by the

hackers

.

Mafia Discussion

Faker [1]:

marcistar

not voting [2]:

Faker,

Meuh

Stop Getting Banned

not voting [3]:

RH9, Dwlee99, Save the Dragons

mod notes

~ this votecount is to make you know i have not abandoned you
~ this is a mod note.

By the way, Faker, is there a reason why you're not cross-posting?
That's usually the norm.

In post 944, RH9 wrote:By the way, Faker, is there a reason why you're not cross-voting?
That's usually the norm.

EBWOP

Yeah, we don't want Meuh to actually hammer the minigame.

Scum up 1-0 means that if Meuh votes marcistar, and I don't hammer, I'm clear and we don't actually have to kick me out of the overall game by formally finishing the minigame. The hard part is actually coordinating so that scum can't selfhammer to deny the second clear.

In post 946, Faker wrote:Yeah, we don't want Meuh to actually hammer the minigame.

Scum up 1-0 means that if Meuh votes marcistar, and I don't hammer, I'm clear and we don't actually have to kick me out of the overall game by formally finishing the minigame. The hard part is actually coordinating so that scum can't selfhammer to deny the second clear.

I see.
That seems really smart of you.
So you want SGB to resolve first if you get cleared? Or am I misinterpreting?

i dont think meuhs that dumb lol

ive never seen meuh hammer without reason

i think ur just trying to fake concern