Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:06 am
OK, so I've read over Xtoxm's recent posts, and I'm actually beginning to second guess myself about his alignment. I have pretty good history with Xtoxm (we've played roughly 4 or 5 completed games with one another of varying alignments), and his play here is beginning to remind me more of his town play as opposed to his scum play. Xtoxm is one of those players who has a tendency to look scummy as town mainly because his playstyle is so unorthodox but when he's scum, he's generally much more lurky and a lot less aggressive in my opinion. I'm going to spend today rereading sthar8 to see if I get the same feeling about him -- the main thing that I disliked about his Day 1 play was the fact that from a very early time period, he pretty much set himself on three main targets (Crazy, iLord, and Raging Rabbit) and showed very little sign of adapting his stances to changing circumstances. Town can do this when they develop tunnel vision, yes, but I can think of reasons for scum to do this as well. I was also bothered by the fact that he didn't seem too open to looking at the new information we gathered from the lynch of scum to possibly garner additional information about other people's alignments.
I still like an icemanE lynch. I looked through his predecessors' play and while there wasn't much there since the two of them were generally lurky (for both of them, this looked somewhat real life related), I did notice two things that really caught my attention.
First with fuzzylightning, I mentioned previously that I really didn't like his FoS of springlullaby during the time that her and I were feuding:
Interestingly, RandomGem did something very similar to fuzzylightning in his single post of content:
icemanE's "posts of content" (I place that in quotations because there's hardly anything there that resembles content) gives me a bad feeling about this role too.
I'm going to spend my time reading the rest of the game today and trying to post my feelings about everyone either later today or within the week. With a little more than a week until deadline, we really need to get a move on this game.
I still like an icemanE lynch. I looked through his predecessors' play and while there wasn't much there since the two of them were generally lurky (for both of them, this looked somewhat real life related), I did notice two things that really caught my attention.
First with fuzzylightning, I mentioned previously that I really didn't like his FoS of springlullaby during the time that her and I were feuding:
I believe it was Guardian who mentioned that he was receiving bad vibes from Jahudo because he felt like Jahudo might have been engaging in a sort of "hedging behavior" where he doesn't completely commit himself to the argument of two townies (me and springlullaby) -- he basically waits it out and offers side comments about the debate here and there waiting to see which of the two wagons gains some traction. fuzzylightning's FoS of springlullaby in the above post gives me a very similar feeling here; I think he may have been engaging in a similar type of "hedging" behavior. If he had actually placed a vote down, I might have not felt as bad about his behavior but the fact that he used an FoS gives me that feeling that he may have been tentatively waiting the feud out to see where it went.[url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1329725#1329725]115[/url], fuzzylightning wrote:Overall, I believe that spring's attack on incog is fairly weak and almost entirely dismissed because of the used of an unverified statistic. Incog also defends himself very well, and even points out the contradiction in the case by saying spring is asking questions of someone he thinks is scum, which he was criticizing incog of doing. Currently I am receiving a pro-town vibe from incog and a slight scum read from lullaby, but not enough for a vote, soFoS: Springlullaby, for a weak, contradictory case and that seemingly random statistic.
Interestingly, RandomGem did something very similar to fuzzylightning in his single post of content:
Again, we see a similar usage of an FoS, and he primarily focuses on the two of us instead of commenting on anyone else. Also, going from memory here, I think it was eldarad who mentioned that he didn't like RandomGem's FoS of iLord since it didn't make sense; RandomGem was claiming that iLord's play looked different from his play from the previous site they played on, but RandomGem mentioned that iLord was[url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1374944#1374944]488[/url], RandomGem wrote:I also agree with Incognito's description of springlullaby's angry meta, and I am leaning towards his side, so
FoS: Guardian, iLord.
scum
in those off-site games. Therefore to FoS someone for playing differently
from how he or she typically plays as scum strikes me as very odd.icemanE's "posts of content" (I place that in quotations because there's hardly anything there that resembles content) gives me a bad feeling about this role too.
This makes me suspect you either might have some sort of a scum power role (like a roleblocker) that might be able to protect you from a vig-bullet or if there's two scum left, your scum buddy might hold a more important role than you, and you're sacrificing yourself to allow him or her to survive. Why do you specifically request to be vigged as opposed to being lynched?[url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1455445#1455445]903[/url], icemanE wrote:Vig me instead.
I'm going to spend my time reading the rest of the game today and trying to post my feelings about everyone either later today or within the week. With a little more than a week until deadline, we really need to get a move on this game.