I really don’t see scum no killing in this setup, so my current theory is RR is 1-shot BP for some reason, maybe Alisae chose that, and then SS trolled and didn’t put town killing roles, however, RR 1-shot BP, no killed to help confirm their eventual claim and actions, but then got venge shot so them being BP still and gambiting actually ended up ruining their gambit.
I can’t see any other reason scum would no kill, tbh, besides the babysitter-Ankamius thing, but even then, Ank could have just killed elsewhere.
Why does Hectic no kill? Because he’s afraid of getting caught/having a town confirmed? Nah, you gotta play it that way. Also, Hectic in BGP risked it for the biscuit, and decided to shoot masons N1/n2 before seeing if there were protective. He risks it for the biscuit.
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:24 pm
by Sherlock and Watson
The main argument for hectic no killing would be because as a claimed joat he needed to use his hood shot at some point otherwise he's get autolynched
Not a great reason and I'm still happy to do rr first
-S
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:25 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 9261, Sherlock and Watson wrote:The main argument for hectic no killing would be because as a claimed joat he needed to use his hood shot at some point otherwise he's get autolynched
Not a great reason and I'm still happy to do rr first
-S
Damn, that is a good argument, actually
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:26 pm
by Flavor Leaf
Then it’s just WIFOM at this point, tbh.
Lynch RR->Ankamius—>Hectic
I think we c an both agree scum is in there.
If espeonage or pine is scum, i think they’d have been outed by now. I think it’s just them town
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:33 pm
by Ankamius
Why didn't hectic use it n3 then
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:36 pm
by Ankamius
Its just rr
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 1:58 am
by Espeonage
I got rando'd to FL
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 2:20 am
by Hectic
gut tells me it's Ankamius
she feels desperate not to be lynched and while knowing we win if she finds 2 other town in the 4, she's not putting effort in to explain which are town and why, to possibly win that way if she does get lynched
Ankamius, did you crumb your J-word this game?
specifically the watcher part
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 2:26 am
by Titus
Can we please feed the blood gods? They're hungry. They don't care about pride.
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 2:28 am
by Hectic
oh so the argument is that the night 4 no kill suggested Reasonably Rational protected someone with their bodyguard, but they still had their 1-shot bulletproof since they didn't die to the TrueSoulEnergy vengekill
so we know scum must have no killed, and there's a lot more reason for Reasonably Rational to do that then any other scum who doesn't even know Reasonably Rational's role at that point
i understand now
VOTE: Reasonably Rational
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 2:29 am
by Hectic
In post 9268, Titus wrote:Can we please feed the blood gods? They're hungry. They don't care about pride.
In post 9268, Titus wrote:Can we please feed the blood gods? They're hungry. They don't care about pride.
hope they like rations
(L-1)
They settle for rations because if rations are evil, they're smart enough to figure out the failsafe. They just want everyone not conftown dead.
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 3:00 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 9269, Hectic wrote:oh so the argument is that the night 4 no kill suggested Reasonably Rational protected someone with their bodyguard, but they still had their 1-shot bulletproof since they didn't die to the TrueSoulEnergy vengekill
so we know scum must have no killed, and there's a lot more reason for Reasonably Rational to do that then any other scum who doesn't even know Reasonably Rational's role at that point
i understand now
VOTE: Reasonably Rational
Correct; however you neighborized the night of the kill on last scum, so you’re a little sketch, but I think it’s RR.
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 3:08 am
by Hectic
doesn't neighbourising the same night as a kill make me less sketch because i'd have to be multitasking?
or do you mean no kill?
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 3:20 am
by Ankamius
In post 9269, Hectic wrote:oh so the argument is that the night 4 no kill suggested Reasonably Rational protected someone with their bodyguard, but they still had their 1-shot bulletproof since they didn't die to the TrueSoulEnergy vengekill
so we know scum must have no killed, and there's a lot more reason for Reasonably Rational to do that then any other scum who doesn't even know Reasonably Rational's role at that point
i understand now