Mafiascum.net

In post 9394, EspressoPatronum wrote:@ML - Your whole point of disagreement with me comes from why I thought/think Wooper over Zora, but I've already said that it has to be one or the other. I'm not interested in voting outside of that, and perhaps that's why we're talking past one another.

My point of "disagreement" comes from you presenting cherry-picked facts and twisted context as evidence against wooper

In post 9399, BBmolla wrote:

In post 9396, Wooper wrote:

In post 9393, BBmolla wrote:

In post 9348, Wooper wrote:Nope, as I said if I were ascetic I would have claimed it first post. Fml pc BBM is confirmed blocked that night.

my motivated ability worked though

??

what happened exacrly?

I was motivated

you were my first target and my action failed

second action succeeded

Wot
Maybe you got hit by two roles that gave you like + and - 1 action but the minus one was shown as a block
Idk

In post 9400, Miss Lane wrote:

In post 9394, EspressoPatronum wrote:@ML - Your whole point of disagreement with me comes from why I thought/think Wooper over Zora, but I've already said that it has to be one or the other. I'm not interested in voting outside of that, and perhaps that's why we're talking past one another.

My point of "disagreement" comes from you presenting cherry-picked facts and twisted context as evidence against wooper

The fact that you haven't given ground on any of our discussion points tells me we're never going to reach an amicable resolution here. I think it's best you put me down as scumlean or whatever you need to do... I'm going to continue doing my thing with the mechanics and flavour of the game.

I'll just make a note to self that you strongly dislike mechanics + move on from there.

In post 9402, EspressoPatronum wrote:

In post 9400, Miss Lane wrote:

In post 9394, EspressoPatronum wrote:@ML - Your whole point of disagreement with me comes from why I thought/think Wooper over Zora, but I've already said that it has to be one or the other. I'm not interested in voting outside of that, and perhaps that's why we're talking past one another.

My point of "disagreement" comes from you presenting cherry-picked facts and twisted context as evidence against wooper

The fact that you haven't given ground on any of our discussion points tells me we're never going to reach an amicable resolution here. I think it's best you put me down as scumlean or whatever you need to do... I'm going to continue doing my thing with the mechanics and flavour of the game.

I'll just make a note to self that you strongly dislike mechanics + move on from there.

I think you completely fail to grasp what I'm getting at and it shows very much here.

The mechanics are here, I'm not going to not use them. I think you're justifying me pointing out the flaws in your arguments with the fact that I don't like games that are mechanically solveable, and trying to turn that into "Miss Lynch is objecting to the mechanics here, not me." I think this is likely true, because you seem to think that I'm objecting to the mechanics here and not the way you're using them. Also because I don't think you've given me a direct response that displays an understanding of what I'm saying yet.

I think you're being destructive to town and justifying it by saying you're trying to use the mechanics of the game to game solve, even though your argument was literally "Wooper is scum outside of the mechanics of the game" and my anger at your pile of bullshit you tried to present as a reasonable discussion on the matter is rooted almost entirely in you presenting Wooper as scum outside of the mechanics of the game. Actually, I'm almost certain that none of the points that I'm contesting you on have really much at all to do with the mechanics, so I'm really not sure where you're getting this from if you aren't just having difficulty understanding that I'm opposed to your lack of reasoning in your argument.

If you don't want to talk anymore, please stop trying to say why we should stop talking, because every time you do, you seem to be putting words in my mouth that I'm not saying, intentional or not.

Dynamax Gamma Emerald, use Max Airstream.

I’m getting townie vibes from Wooper in the past few pages. Let’s get the other one on Amawesome’s list

Wot

we can literally just lynch both of them ffs why are we arguing about this

In post 9090, pisskop wrote:I think wooper is by far the most likely town out of the lurkers, and I think its incredibly low hanging fruit to push. its lazy, and its flips provides us with very limited info.

Like, you're ignoring everything about why he's in a poe except the lurking bit, which isn't even a big reason to scumread wooper and isn't a major reason he's being wagoned.

In post 9409, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 9090, pisskop wrote:I think wooper is by far the most likely town out of the lurkers, and I think its incredibly low hanging fruit to push. its lazy, and its flips provides us with very limited info.

Like, you're ignoring everything about why he's in a poe except the lurking bit, which isn't even a big reason to scumread wooper and isn't a major reason he's being wagoned.

EP would disagree with you

You wanna bring those other reasons up, though?

Ah, damn. I’m the highest poster still alive. I’m gonna get got soon

someone ask me some questions. I'll be respondy today

In post 9414, Elements wrote:someone ask me some questions. I'll be respondy today

Can you make a super strong town case on me so I don’t have to talk about myself more?

In post 9415, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 9414, Elements wrote:someone ask me some questions. I'll be respondy today

Can you make a super strong town case on me so I don’t have to talk about myself more?

Don't lynch FL. I'll shoot them tonight.

Not technically what you asked for, but it has the same effect

Theres a pattern to disagreements with Enter that has happened at least three times this game. I wonder if this will persist a fourth time?

Taking on bets for it.

In post 9418, Firebringer wrote:Theres a pattern to disagreements with Enter that has happened at least three times this game. I wonder if this will persist a fourth time?

Taking on bets for it.

ooohhhhh

do share!

and then share how this is in any way productive

also in your 5 page essay, i'd like you to include why it's appropriate to begin trying to dismiss other players as simply disagreeable just because you can't figure out that you should probably maintain the same standard you're trying to hold others to

after that, I'd like you to make another five page essay on why you shouldn't make passive aggressive comments with the intent of making other people angry for no real reason other than to sate your lust for revenge after having to deal with public shame because you acted like an ass in front of everyone

if I wanted to be productive, I wouldn't be playing mafia my friend.

and probably one more after that on trying to get the last word in while still trying to look like you maintained your composure even though you still seem pretty darn mad that you can't just waltz in here and then accuse other people of not having read your posts when you haven't read theirs and you're both nowhere near up to date. In this one you should include discussion on why it's important to respond to people when they do sorts of things like try and get on the same page as you with something other than "fuck you read my posts" if you haven't read their posts yet either.

In post 9422, Firebringer wrote:if I wanted to be productive, I wouldn't be playing mafia my friend.

sorry

let me rephrase

share how this is in any way relevant to pushing the game forward and not just a personal agenda against a player you have a grudge against