Saving Nasubi: Game over, Nasubi is Dead Long Live Nasubi

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 8:58 am

Stephoscope wrote:No, if you lynch me, scum NKs the other townie and wins.

No, if we lynch you we lynch scum. We win and you lose.

Stephoscope · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 9:04 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:No, if you lynch me, scum NKs the other townie and wins.
No, if we lynch you we lynch scum. We win and you lose.

IF YOU'RE TOWN, which I highly doubt, dogfood girl...why don't you put forth your case against me now, instead of yammering on and on about how I need to die...then support the no-lynch effort and put the decision into the great Nasubi's hands?

Stephoscope · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 9:05 am

EBWOP: The no-lynch is not just to put the effort into Nasubi's hands, of course...it is to narrow down his list of lynch candidates. There is no pro-town reason not to do that, and there is no pro-town reason for DGB repeatedly avoiding the subject.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 10:31 am

What effort in Nasubi's hands? I don't know what you're talking about. But here's what I do know"

I know Seraphim is not scum.
I know farside is not scum.
I know that I'm not scum.

Yet the game hasn't ended. So there is one more scum. That scum is you.

IF we "no lynch," tomorrow the game will have you, Seraphim, and another townie. If we no lynch, you'll be in a way better position to win the game for yourself and your scumpals.

So if you don't mind. We're lynching scum for the win. I'm sorry it has to be you! But such is life.

Stephoscope · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 10:34 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:What effort in Nasubi's hands? I don't know what you're talking about. But here's what I do know"

I know Seraphim is not scum.
I know farside is not scum.
I know that I'm not scum.

Yet the game hasn't ended. So there is one more scum. That scum is you.

IF we "no lynch," tomorrow the game will have you, Seraphim, and another townie. If we no lynch, you'll be in a way better position to win the game for yourself and your scumpals.

So if you don't mind. We're lynching scum for the win. I'm sorry it has to be you! But such is life.

Either you are scum, and/or you are posting from Bizarro World. I am the most confirmed of anyone, save Nasubi!

Let's say I am scum, which I'm not. Explain why I would be in a better position to win if we no-lynch. If you can provide some explanation that makes sense, perhaps I will re-think my desire for a no-lynch, as I don't want to put the scum in any better position to win. If you can't provide such an explanation, it's gonna make you look pretty bad, huh?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 10:35 am

Stephoscope wrote:I am the most confirmed of anyone.

In your dreams.

Stephoscope · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 11:33 am

Stephoscope wrote:Let's say I am scum, which I'm not. Explain why I would be in a better position to win if we no-lynch. If you can provide some explanation that makes sense, perhaps I will re-think my desire for a no-lynch, as I don't want to put the scum in any better position to win. If you can't provide such an explanation, it's gonna make you look pretty bad, huh?

Should I just keep on posting this until you address it?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 11:39 am

Stephoscope wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:Let's say I am scum, which I'm not. Explain why I would be in a better position to win if we no-lynch. If you can provide some explanation that makes sense, perhaps I will re-think my desire for a no-lynch, as I don't want to put the scum in any better position to win. If you can't provide such an explanation, it's gonna make you look pretty bad, huh?
Should I just keep on posting this until you address it?

You're scum. That's why it makes sense.

Stephoscope · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 11:44 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:Let's say I am scum, which I'm not. Explain why I would be in a better position to win if we no-lynch. If you can provide some explanation that makes sense, perhaps I will re-think my desire for a no-lynch, as I don't want to put the scum in any better position to win. If you can't provide such an explanation, it's gonna make you look pretty bad, huh?
Should I just keep on posting this until you address it?
You're scum. That's why it makes sense.

No, I'm not scum, and that made no sense.

Explain why we should not do a no-lynch and narrow the field.

THEN, if you insist on declaring me scum and everyone else town, you can share your logic. I breadcrumbed my role early on, and every other vanilla townie knew it. I hope all remaining townies do a re-read.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 11:47 am

Stephoscope wrote:No, I'm not scum, and that made no sense.

But see, unless you confess, we're bound to disagree forever.

Stephoscope wrote:Explain why we should not do a no-lynch and narrow the field.

I already did. It narrows it down for Stephscum. No lynch is defenitely better for Stephscum than a lynch of Stephscum.

Stephoscope wrote:THEN, if you insist on declaring me scum and everyone else town, you can share your logic. I breadcrumbed my role early on, and every other vanilla townie knew it. I hope all remaining townies do a re-read.

Safeclaim? Who knows. All other players are actually proven except you. Good luck convincing the others to no lynch.

Stephoscope · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 11:50 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:I am the most confirmed of anyone.
In your dreams.

For the record, this is a misrepresentation of what I said.

My exact words were "I am the most confirmed of anyone, save Nasubi!"

Not that you deserve the benefit of the doubt here, but I was using "save" as a synonym for "except for", not as a verb.

Stephoscope · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 11:55 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:All other players are actually proven except you. Good luck convincing the others to no lynch.

And how exactly do you think you (and, for that matter, farside) are "proven"? Because you send food? The Genitals Censor was scum, but you're really pretending that a Dogfood Sender couldn't be?

On the off chance that you are town, I need you to understand that you are playing very, very anti-town here...not only are you claiming things are "proven" when they're not, but you're advocating an immediate lynch that will give the scum the win.

Why are you so terrified about doing a no-lynch and sending this to the finals?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 11:58 am

Stephoscope wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:All other players are actually proven except you. Good luck convincing the others to no lynch.
And how exactly do you think you (and, for that matter, farside) are "proven"? Because you send food? The Genitals Censor was scum, but you're really pretending that a Dogfood Sender couldn't be?

I'm pretty sure farside is town regardless of her ice cream truck. I believe Seraphim. So you're scum.

Stephoscope wrote:On the off chance that you are town, I need you to understand that you are playing very, very anti-town here...not only are you claiming things are "proven" when they're not, but you're advocating an immediate lynch that will give the scum the win.

Ugh? There's one scum left, and that's not me, farside or Seraphim. How is this anti-town?

Stephoscope wrote:Why are you so terrified about doing a no-lynch and sending this to the finals?

I'm in a hurry to win. I want to retire from mafia.

Stephoscope · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:06 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm pretty sure farside is town regardless of her ice cream truck. I believe Seraphim. So you're scum.

See that's funny, because you just thought it was "proven", now you're just "pretty sure". You believe Seraphim about what?

Seraphim, since this game is still going, one of the players sending you food is scum. This is fact. My lynch would prove that to you, but my lynch would also lead to a scum win, which is why I am supporting your no-lynch proposition.

DrippingGoofball wrote:Ugh? There's one scum left, and that's not me, farside or Seraphim. How is this anti-town?

Because you're totally wrong. I'm actually thankful you're "clearing" farside, though...it proves your scumminess.

DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm in a hurry to win. I want to retire from mafia.

I don't need to say a word about how completely anti-town this is. That's your only reason?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:08 pm

Stephoscope wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm pretty sure farside is town regardless of her ice cream truck. I believe Seraphim. So you're scum.
See that's funny, because you just thought it was "proven", now you're just "pretty sure". You believe Seraphim about what?

She's proven. If she wasn't, I'd be

pretty sure

just by her behavior alone.

Seraphim wrote:Because you're totally wrong. I'm actually thankful you're "clearing" farside, though...it proves your scumminess.

FAIL

Seraphim wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm in a hurry to win. I want to retire from mafia.
I don't need to say a word about how completely anti-town this is. That's your only reason?

I want to win. As town. By killing scum. Like you.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:09 pm

Stephoscope wrote:Seraphim, since this game is still going, one of the players sending you food is scum. This is fact. My lynch would prove that to you, but my lynch would also lead to a scum win, which is why I am supporting your no-lynch proposition.

From my perspective, that would have to be farside, if what you say is true. But it's not farside. It's you. You're the scum.

Stephoscope · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:12 pm

farside, how do you feel about a no-lynch?

How do you feel about DGB's behavior?

If you're town, know that I am town too (it's funny how DGB keeps going on about "proof" when I'm the only one who actually proved my alignment), and one of us will die tonight if we no-lynch. But it puts Nasubi in a good place to cast the deciding vote.

Stephoscope · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:13 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:Seraphim, since this game is still going, one of the players sending you food is scum. This is fact. My lynch would prove that to you, but my lynch would also lead to a scum win, which is why I am supporting your no-lynch proposition.
From my perspective, that would have to be farside, if what you say is true. But it's not farside. It's you. You're the scum.

No, I'm not, and if you're town you are making a huge mistake with your tunneling, your bogus claims of "proof", and your refusal to help no-lynch us to better odds.

But, you're probably scum.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:16 pm

Stephoscope wrote:...I'm the only one who actually proved my alignment).

ORLY

Stephoscope · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:18 pm

Stephoscope wrote:If I picked a live player at random who might be Nasubi, I think I would have a 10% chance of picking Nasubi.

YARLY

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:26 pm

Stephoscope wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:If I picked a live player at random who might be Nasubi, I think I would have a 10% chance of picking Nasubi.
YARLY

That means nothing next to ice cream delivery.

Stephoscope · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Fri May 22, 2009 12:35 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:If I picked a live player at random who might be Nasubi, I think I would have a 10% chance of picking Nasubi.
YARLY
That means nothing next to ice cream delivery.

Again, the freaking Genitals Censor was scum, so don't pretend a food sender can't be.

Oh I get it--you're totally the scum. You have to pretend that sending food is an automatic clear, because otherwise, anyone knows to pick the ice cream person over the dogfood person when it finally comes to that!

farside22 · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2009 1:51 pm

Hello people. I'm back from my trip.

DGB why are you against a no lynch if you are sure the stepho is scum. We mislynch we lose.

Steph: I agree and disagree with a no lynch. I agree that it should be one less person to analysis but either today or tomorrow is lylo. How strongly do you feel that today vs. tomorrow makes a difference on when we lynch if you are sure who is scum?

Sera: What do you think is best for the situation?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2009 2:06 pm

farside22 wrote:DGB why are you against a no lynch if you are sure the stepho is scum. We mislynch we lose.

But then we'd have to lynch him tomorrow... putting it off doesn't make sense. What am I missing?

farside22 · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2009 2:29 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
farside22 wrote:DGB why are you against a no lynch if you are sure the stepho is scum. We mislynch we lose.
But then we'd have to lynch him tomorrow... putting it off doesn't make sense. What am I missing?

But pushing the idea looks scummy as it's an auto win for scum.
You have pointed out that steph is the last scum. You could be the last scum.
Dog food is a strange item to give to nasubi don't you think? Plus you were vague on what you gave. Why?