Mafiascum.net

In post 934, Mitillos wrote:I'm still thinking mnemonic-scum.

He's certainly on the same level of uselessness as MuM, but I have no idea if that means scum for either of them.

--Prod dodge

^Point proven.

@BB: And yet you're voting one of them. Specifically, the one who produced slightly more content, of the two.

Anyway, I have no idea what RC claimed. What is an Annie and what is a Tibbers?

In post 953, Mitillos wrote:@BB: And yet you're voting one of them. Specifically, the one who produced slightly more content, of the two.

Anyway, I have no idea what RC claimed. What is an Annie and what is a Tibbers?

It's from a video game League of Legends.

Despite the number of Ns in Annie, I think they were being cheeky.

In post 948, Shadowy Poison wrote:

In post 945, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 906, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 886, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 863, Diabolik wrote:IF u re networker this means there are town with a qt, unless u re a scum networker.so town with a qt should be able to confirm u ?

I would think so and that is what kept me from just saying lynch me on day one... it did seem like BBMolla is connected with someone and have him as town.

Maybe I should translate Diabolik.

In post 863, Diabolik wrote:You claimed Networker. If you networked town last night, they should be able to verify they have a QT with you to confirm your claim. Who is the person that will confirm you have a QT with them?

Diabolik was actually saying this:

"If you are a networker, that means there are town with a QT...unless you are a scum networker. So town with a QT should be able to confirm you?"

Peace doesn't network anyone, his ability is passive: as long as he's alive, all active QTs have daytalk. He says so right here:

In post 833, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 830, RadiantCowbells wrote:I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(

that is a lie or you are paranoid...
might as well claim then- my role is Networker. It is negative ultility. There may be logic in my dying, as anyone who has a QT has full access during the day as long as alive. I die they lose it.

How did you miss all this?

- Des

I think you missed something.

Networker is not a an Encoder.

In post 953, Mitillos wrote:@BB: And yet you're voting one of them. Specifically, the one who produced slightly more content, of the two.

*shrug*

I'm still all for lynching them, I'm never going to get a good read on them and they're just going to mishammer me in LYLO.

My read on them is scummy, but as I said, no idea if it's just that they play exactly to how I consider scum to play or what.

I think that there are townreads on RC where there shouldn't be.

I feel fairly good about RC atm.

In post 958, BBmolla wrote:I feel fairly good about RC atm.

Likewise.

@RC: I'd like some more information from you. No references to other games, though. You claimed a guilty result on Peace. What is your role? Do you know how reliable this result is? Why did you not vote Peace, if you have a guilty result on him?

@Pere: Your links seem a bit off. Anyway, maybe Networker is just N's N-word for Encryptor? You know, like Namecaller was the N-word for Framer.

Ok so.
We have PC who is keeping up BB and RC Qt atm apparently and he is not part of it.. bb and rc are saying the don't know each other faction.but they are both cop.. not a scum naive/para cop is unlikely..
i wonder if there are other day qt.. if we assume they re both town and mum and mili are town( yeah cause mum is prob confirmed town and militos is not scumtelling)
PV is prob scum.with nina.

In post 909, BBmolla wrote:Oh

Well this is awkward

...

It was a mod error

>_>

@Luna:

Case 1 - BB is telling the truth. Then you're asking the mod to confirm BB's claim, at least for the fact that his role is investigative and got the wrong result last night.

Case 2 - BB is lying. Then you're asking the mod to essentially confirm BB's alignment as scum.

I'd like it if we did get told these things, but I'm not sure this would be in the spirit of the game.

In post 963, Mitillos wrote:BB is telling the truth. Then you're asking the mod to confirm BB's claim, at least for the fact that his role is investigative and got the wrong result last night.

I'm asking the mod to confirm BB's claim because if the mod made an error and caught it midday, I expect the moderator to publicly acknowledge that they made a mistake. Having to explain a flop on a result because of mod error is far more unfair than confirming that you made a mistake. Molla could be a scum naive cop with an incorrect result and he certainly should not have to talk his way out of that as scum.

In post 963, Mitillos wrote:Case 2 - BB is lying. Then you're asking the mod to essentially confirm BB's alignment as scum.

That's the type of gambit you should clear with the mod first.

Fair enough. I can see that claiming a mod error as a stratagem is a horrible precedent to set, so I take your point.

My guess is:
c)Mod isn't going to confirm.

My vote is :
VOTE: PeregrineV

In post 964, Luna Lovegood wrote:I'm asking the mod to confirm BB's claim because if the mod made an error and caught it midday, I expect the moderator to publicly acknowledge that they made a mistake. Having to explain a flop on a result because of mod error is far more unfair than confirming that you made a mistake. Molla could be a scum naive cop with an incorrect result and he certainly should not have to talk his way out of that as scum.

That'd confirm my role dude. I recieved a PM telling me about the error, but,

I doubt the mod will confirm in thread.

@BB: Is RC your neighbour? Can he confirm this?

@RC: See above.

In post 933, Diabolik wrote:yeah he is flying too low.. for sure 1/2 scum ae lurking.

What does this mean in terms of alignment to you?

why do you say scum is lurking

why did you drop him from your list of suspicion when you received your role PM?

Further more, would you be willing to vote Mitillos with us?

@Shadow: Are you even voting me?

Checked. Nope, you're voting Diabolik. And asking him to vote me with you. Is this a hydra dissonance thing, or?

In post 969, Shadowy Poison wrote:

In post 933, Diabolik wrote:yeah he is flying too low.. for sure 1/2 scum ae lurking.

What does this mean in terms of alignment to you?

why do you say scum is lurking

why did you drop him from your list of suspicion when you received your role PM?

who is dropped from my list?

In post 970, Shadowy Poison wrote:Further more, would you be willing to vote Mitillos with us?

naaa, not today.. are u willing to vote pv?

continually faultfinding, complaining, or petulant: a nagging parent.

Vote Count 2.04

Luna Lovegood

( 0 )

Dante

( 0 )

DeasVail

( 0 )

Shadowy Poison

( 1 ) mnemonicdevice

Rail Tracer

( 0 )

PeaceBringer

( 0 )

mnemonicdevice

( 3 ) Dante , Rail Tracer ooba

ooba

( 0 )

PeregrineV

( 2 ) PeaceBringer , Diabolik

Nani

( 0 )

Metal Unites Mutley

( 1 ) BBmolla

Mitillos

( 1 ) Luna Lovegood

RadiantCowbells

( 1 ) DeasVail

Diabolik

( 1 ) Shadowy Poison

BBmolla

( 2 ) Metal Unites Mutley

Not voting:

PeregrineV , Nani , Mitillos , RadiantCowbells

With 15 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline is in

ooba is V/LA for four days.

wow diabolik is sooooooo town


his posts are poor in english but they're extremely helpful/full of facts

i can actually read them so yes this guy is 100% town yes

VOTE: mnemonic