Page 39 of 85

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:44 pm
by Double Trouble
Desperado wrote:
Double Trouble wrote:@ika -- Desp/Shos's responses is scum.

My hydra partner and I put something only scum would react to in the thread.
Desp/Shos did.
Look at Desp and Shos responses at the start of the day ika. That will help.

-- Double

Double Trouble wrote:
ika wrote:
Double Trouble wrote:I also don't like Aronis's can we lynch X now?


have you been catching up or just not reading?


@Desp -- The question was to you but both you and Shos reacted in a way we consider scummy. It's not THAT you responded. It is HOW you responded.


Yes...I do not see the conflict here.

We did something. It was posed to you. Both you and Shos reacted scummily. Not sure why you bolded that.

-- Double

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:52 pm
by shos
Double Trouble wrote:VOTE: Desperado

I know. Explain.

Desperado wrote:No clue what you're talking about.

Double Trouble wrote:Yes you do Desp. So does shos.

Desperado wrote:No, I really don't.

Double Trouble wrote:Iknow ALL about you and your team. The hatching egg told me.

shos wrote:well, I am disappointed from Pants' flip. the good news, though, is that I can become conftown very easily, but I am also very stupid, and lol.

An Egg NK makes sense, I think he was pretty town read. it's a shame he was a JOAT, though.
what do now.

????
how is my post even a reaction to yours.?
also, how is desp' posts scummy?
and the best - how the fuck does that tie us together??? I keep seeing shos and desp desp/shos shos/desp but ffs why the fuck are we always binded together?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:54 pm
by shos
Double Trouble wrote:Strongly implying a guilty on Desp here. Let me be a little more direct. We were watching Egg last night.

Holding firm the team is Desp shos BBT. Good night.

~Trouble

Perfect Chaos wrote:Hold up. So you saw Desp visit Egg when no one else did?

Aronis wrote:I'm on board with a Desp lynch at this point. This will prob be considered omgus, but I haven't liked his posts at all and the push on me feels empty.

VOTE: Desperado

Double Trouble wrote:Gotcha, PC. Scum had a ninja but only scum would know that. I was watching Egg but I saw no one. Only scum would know I would not have seen Egg's killer.

That took all of one post.

VOTE: Perfect Chaos

Aronis wrote:Ummm. Wtf?

Double Trouble wrote:Pretty sure PC just confirmed Desp scum as well.

I love it when a plan comes together.


I imply guilty on Desp bc everyone knew I was watching Egg.
Get no result on Egg. Thus scum used Ninja.
PC says that I could not have seen Desp kill Egg because no one could. This suggests he knew Desp was unwatchable.
Only scum would know ninja exists.

Thus PC is scum.

Double Trouble wrote:Retract. Whoops. Double meaning. PC likely meant No one else but Desp visited Egg and I read the answet I wanted. Derp.

Well scum had ninja.

VOTE: Desperado

Desperado wrote:So...we are back to me not having a clue what you're referring to?



DT, you make no sense.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:54 pm
by shos
Double Trouble wrote:
Desperado wrote:
Double Trouble wrote:@ika -- Desp/Shos's responses is scum.

My hydra partner and I put something only scum would react to in the thread.
Desp/Shos did.
Look at Desp and Shos responses at the start of the day ika. That will help.

-- Double

Double Trouble wrote:
ika wrote:
Double Trouble wrote:I also don't like Aronis's can we lynch X now?


have you been catching up or just not reading?


@Desp -- The question was to you but both you and Shos reacted in a way we consider scummy. It's not THAT you responded. It is HOW you responded.


Yes...I do not see the conflict here.

We did something. It was posed to you. Both you and Shos reacted scummily. Not sure why you bolded that.

-- Double

*ONLY SCUM WOULD REACT TO THIS*
*IT IS NOT THE FACT YOU REACTED*
still no contradiction here.?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
by shos
I'm confused

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:08 pm
by Desperado
Because you just said that you put something in the thread that only scum would respond to and then Shos and I responded to it, thus we are scum. Even though you specifically addressed both of us.

This is not the same thing as Shos and I responding to something in a scummy way.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:10 pm
by Desperado
PS it's pretty bullshit for you to say I'm "not scumhunting or clarifying my misunderstanding," which I am assuming to mean scumhunting your slot and clarifying your read on me, when you have not been active since daystart.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:54 pm
by ika
shos: whats your favorite color?

im wanting the PC lynch more now

VOTE: PC

only really vu i think hes was beeing a cheecky scumbutt

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:08 pm
by theaceofspades
DT you are officially making zeros sense. Everything's been pointed out already, but you are seriously not forming cogent thoughts here.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:36 pm
by shos
uh, green? why?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:42 pm
by Perfect Chaos
ika wrote:shos: whats your favorite color?

im wanting the PC lynch more now

VOTE: PC

only really vu i think hes was beeing a cheecky scumbutt


Does the final sentence there tell why you voted us? If so, could you please translate that into something i can respond to?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:59 pm
by ika
shos wrote:uh, green? why?


i would answer it but then it spoils my plan, ill explain later

i think Double (math) is just derping off again and titus needs to either explain thing better or move her vote to PC

Perfect Chaos wrote:
ika wrote:shos: whats your favorite color?

im wanting the PC lynch more now

VOTE: PC

only really vu i think hes was beeing a cheecky scumbutt


Does the final sentence there tell why you voted us? If so, could you please translate that into something i can respond to?


it might?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:01 pm
by shos
ika wrote:
shos wrote:uh, green? why?


i would answer it but then it spoils my plan, ill explain later

well, no, so explain it now. I can't see how this is relevant and you keep a sking that

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:02 pm
by ika
shos wrote:
ika wrote:
shos wrote:uh, green? why?


i would answer it but then it spoils my plan, ill explain later

well, no, so explain it now. I can't see how this is relevant and you keep a sking that


what if i told you it was a loaded question? would that answer it?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:09 pm
by Perfect Chaos
Mislynching us won't be such a bad thing. At least it would give you a direction to move in after we die, because until then we are just going to be a shiny thing to distract everything from moving forward. I think I have a way to prove we are town, but I need to look back at the thread for a minute.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:15 pm
by shos
I'm currently wanting to lynch either DT, or ace. grayfoxxx can obviously die too but he's too lurky to be a viable wagon.


actually. how bout some xxx lynch

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:23 pm
by ika
why DT?

shos, lets play a game: if all 3 people you just named are town, whos scum? i do this with titus a lot when she becomes derp so lets see if it works with you

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:30 pm
by shos
because of her desperate attempts? first with the 'guilty implying' that turned out to be fake and just got them to claim(or fakeclaim) and now this whole 'only scum would pick up' thing, which is really beyond me. I mean, I would totally understand if these were general reaction tests for the bleeding of a dying game as a provokation of discussion. but they seem to be really serious with that shit, and I mean, it's a hydra. so it HAS to be intentional, or one of the heads would speak up.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:34 pm
by shos
ika wrote:if all 3 people you just named are town, whos scum?

geraintm, Natirasha and uhhhh Aronis, I would guess. but six scumreads is practically half the game, that's quite useless. what's the next step in the game?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:35 pm
by ika
really? thats what you got?

their "gambit" is your reason?

pedit: but that doesnt fit arent gerin and arnaoris masons (or at least claimed it?)

how does desp/PC/BBT team sound?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:45 pm
by shos
I've seen scum claim masons together. that's why they're not in the top 3 right now.
and that team sounds like 2 of my 3 best townreads and PC which I've got nothing bad on. so, no, lol.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:48 pm
by ika
shos wrote:I've seen scum claim masons together. that's why they're not in the top 3 right now.
and that team sounds like 2 of my 3 best townreads and PC which I've got nothing bad on. so, no, lol.


if you have nothign bad on him you should have no problem voting him then?

how about you expalin those townreads?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 4:00 pm
by ika
hmmmm.....

i need titus......

something isnt fitting right

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 4:00 pm
by theaceofspades
don't do that shos. explaining town reads is always bad.

ika i'd like to know what you're getting at. And i'm STILL not sure why people are scumreading BBT.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 4:04 pm
by ika
theaceofspades wrote:don't do that shos. explaining town reads is always bad.

ika i'd like to know what you're getting at. And i'm STILL not sure why people are scumreading BBT.


im trying to figure out why something isnt adding up