Page 39 of 217

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:01 pm
by JaeReed
Hey Vedith talk to me about Creature? I didn't like his thing about everyone being unreadable like 15 pages in or so. So far at page 20 reading up.

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:12 pm
by Vedith
In post 950, JaeReed wrote:Hey Vedith talk to me about Creature? I didn't like his thing about everyone being unreadable like 15 pages in or so. So far at page 20 reading up.
Okay.
I don't see anything different from Creature here than normal.
His reads are pretty good so far and he's still active.

I did miss the post where he claims that he can't read anyone though, where is it?

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:46 pm
by JaeReed
In post 366, Creature wrote:Sorry everyone's being unreadable and game is currently uninteresting.
Page 15, then proceeds to say he'll just sheep someone (presumably Creeps) and votes Gamma. I'm used to town Creature getting reads off far less than what was in thread by page 15. Might be an investment issue rather than AI.

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:47 pm
by Creature
Wasn't really motivated.

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:48 pm
by Creature
What do you think about RachMarie and Creeps20? Since you like meta, you can see them.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:21 am
by Vedith
In post 952, JaeReed wrote:
In post 366, Creature wrote:Sorry everyone's being unreadable and game is currently uninteresting.
Page 15, then proceeds to say he'll just sheep someone (presumably Creeps) and votes Gamma. I'm used to town Creature getting reads off far less than what was in thread by page 15. Might be an investment issue rather than AI.
I guess it's possbile. I still like Creature as town though. Opinion on how his attitude changes to the game throughout day 1?

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:05 am
by JaeReed
In post 954, Creature wrote:What do you think about RachMarie and Creeps20? Since you like meta, you can see them.
I'm too lazy to do a dive. I brought up meta with you because I've played with you before.

I think RachMarie is a fine candidate for scum as of page 20.
I think Creeps has a lot of his scumreads as scumreads for entirely NAI reasons, or just for being anti-town (anti-town does not necessarily mean scum indicative). Plus the null reads where I feel there should be enough for a read. I did read a newbie game with him in it recently where he was town and looked kinda scummy to me, just off memory. I'm hoping he has more further on for me to figure out if he's just using bad logic or scum that doesn't know what to push on.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:17 am
by KuroiXHF
In post 947, Vedith wrote:Titus is town. She's still fucking stupid, but town.
That's kind of uncalled for.

VOTE: Creature For same reasons as yesterday.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:29 am
by JaeReed
In post 955, Vedith wrote:I guess it's possbile. I still like Creature as town though. Opinion on how his attitude changes to the game throughout day 1?
I'm only up to page 20 in my catchup and it's like 10pm so I'll get back to you on this. Off the top of my head I liked the questioning about GE after the post I quoted, disliked the push on Postie for the "slip" but he wasn't the main proponent there so idunno. I also liked the townread on DEO. Don't get the townread on RachMarie at like page 19ish(?).

I do like the pick up since the quote I posted so far in my read.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:32 am
by Vedith
In post 957, KuroiXHF wrote:That's kind of uncalled for.

VOTE: Creature For same reasons as yesterday.
Probably but the fact she pushed so hard with her little sheep buddies on Shadow for that was uncalled for.
The problem with Titus, she doesn't
ever
think she's wrong. You start to think of getting to a stage where you just don't interact with her.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:47 am
by KuroiXHF
Let's say all your accusations are true. She'd either need to know 100% that she's right, which would probably be cheating, or she should show some humility.

Either way, calling someone fucking stupid is rude.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:50 am
by Vedith
In post 960, KuroiXHF wrote:Let's say all your accusations are true. She'd either need to know 100% that she's right, which would probably be cheating, or she should show some humility.

Either way, calling someone fucking stupid is rude.
Yeah I'm just in a foul mood in general anyway, but I doubt Titus will take it too personally.
If you do Titus, my apologies.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:55 am
by KuroiXHF
In post 961, Vedith wrote:If you do Titus, my apologies.
Hey now, I have a wife.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:57 am
by Vedith
In post 962, KuroiXHF wrote:
In post 961, Vedith wrote:If you do Titus, my apologies.
Hey now, I have a wife.
:?:

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 2:00 am
by KuroiXHF
It's how your misuse of punctuation made the sentence read different than how I believe you intended it to come across.

You said: "If you do Titus, my apologies," meaning, "If you do (have sex with) Titus, I'm sorry."

Perhaps what you meant was: "If you do, Titus, my apologies." This means that if she did have a problem with your calling her a fucking idiot, you apologize.

Just a quick English mechanics lesson from KuroiXHF, which has nothing to do with the game.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 2:05 am
by Vedith
Shut up, Kuroi! :giggle:

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 2:20 am
by drealmerz7
yay for grammar lessons!!! ppl definitely need to know

let's eat, grandma!

let's eat grandma!

mean 2 very different things

---
scumleans

The DEO
RM
Vedith

too many null players - get in the game!


postie
creeps
JR
GE

townleans

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 2:23 am
by Creature
In post 966, drealmerz7 wrote:scumleans

The DEO

RM
Vedith


too many null players - get in the game!


postie
creeps

JR
GE

townleans
FTFY

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 2:25 am
by Postie
In post 935, The DEO wrote:Shadowstep claimed we should lynch me because I am always scum and lied about it. That netted me scum 3 times in a row. It was the most reliable tell I had ever developed. Dude is allegedly town, wtf.
It's almost like extrapolating things from a tiny sample size is terrible idea that has been shown to frequently yield inaccurate results

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 4:47 am
by The DEO
In post 965, Vedith wrote:Shut up, Kuroi! :giggle:
What? No love for the green Martian? Maybe that is Vedith's thing.

~~Alex Danvers joking about Vedith + Hank Hanshaw

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 4:51 am
by The DEO
It seems as if Rach Marie is following a scum activity pattern and needs analysis. Especially how it does not seem like Rach Marie is actively looking for scum. As town they usually post reads early. This is odd for them.

~~ Alex Danvers musing over paperwork on her desk

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 4:54 am
by Postie
I wouldn't be opposed to a quicklynch on RachMarie at this point.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:45 am
by Creature
We could go for Postie too.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:46 am
by Creature
KTS was the scum mislynch, The DEO is being treated like KTS was.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:47 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 973, Creature wrote:KTS was the scum mislynch, The DEO is being treated like KTS was.
?