Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2019 9:20 pm
I have a meta tellIn post 948, Dannflor wrote:Why do you say thisIn post 947, chennisden wrote:d2 i promise you skitter will be sorted beyond a reasonable doubt.
I have a meta tellIn post 948, Dannflor wrote:Why do you say thisIn post 947, chennisden wrote:d2 i promise you skitter will be sorted beyond a reasonable doubt.
Why?
I don’t see how not having a strong belief or full assurance would make you think he’s scum here. It sounds more of you problem than anything. I want to say you’re town for expressing this though and it isn’t something that you made up because of how you felt your first go around arguing with him. (292)In post 670, Cinnamon wrote:I am conceding that it was weird that I didn't respond to the pisskop pocket claim; but even so if you think that's scummy I would think that would make me scummy on my own more than scummy as a team with pisskop.
I mean concerted effort in that one of you is pushing that to shade me as part of a larger gameplan, not that you are both doing it together.
I'm not confident that I can argue better than you can, and that's why I think you'd be making this push as mafia. It feels 'icky' to quote dannfloor to me because I think you're trying to make accusatory statements to make me 'slip up' rather than actually trying to gamesolve. I say this because I don't see you trying to reconsider my alignment at all.
In post 671, pisskop wrote:Exil is scum, when can you wagon him
Exil is apparently trying to shame people into voting.
Why aren’t we lynching here again?In post 672, pisskop wrote:But i have done no reading to verify that.
I see attempt to figure out why you aren’t voting PK more than misrepresentation here. Similar to how I did with Mena.In post 673, Cinnamon wrote:Stuff like this is exactly what I mean. This just seems to be purposefully misrepping me and twisting what I've said, without actually trying to engage me on my play.In post 669, Exilon wrote: So then you have a conundrum here, don't you? If your case on Menalque is weakining and now Pisskopp is scummier, but you're unsure of their claim.... the thing you do... is accuse me and Dennis-chan ... of being a scum team?
Why did you delay reading Rob?In post 679, chennisden wrote:I haven't read Rob yet and will do so
He’s not really defending PK’s play though. He’s defending the claim. A claim that is a very good one for scum to makeIn post 761, skitter30 wrote:the more i think about it the more i feel like scum who knows that doing X will make them look scummy won't do X because it makes them look scummyIn post 661, Exilon wrote:I think you've covered this with someone else and you're aware of it (I think skitter mentioned that it was looking like you were scum trying to avoid his partner getting lynched).In post 655, Menalque wrote: (...)
why do you dislike the timing re:pisskop? that was the whole impetus for why I started finding luv scummy, with the intent prompting me to go back and read his ISO
(...)
That's what I mean about timing.
It actually to me came a bit out of left field, and while I can certainly believe that his vote spurred you to go into his ISO and make a deep analysis, it still feels as if you're having a hard time letting go of some points and you seem to be grasping very hard at the notion that he must be scummy, the proof you have should be enough, and that we can find much more of it if we keep reading the ISO.
You know? It's not like you don't want to be wrong about him, it's that at some points your insistence feels similar to stalling.
like if menalque knows that defendign partner!pisskop will make him look bad, why does he do it?
Don’t follow the solve the setup philosophy. Do you think PK’s play come from town? Why or why not?In post 826, chennisden wrote:Different.In post 820, Menalque wrote:Are these reasons the same ones why you believe the pisskop claim or different ones?
My reasons for believing the pisskop claim are speculatory
The reason I won't get lynched is pretty concrete
I forgot who but someone said that Cinnamon’s tone just reeks of town and I think this is prime example of that in every wayIn post 888, Cinnamon wrote:chennis i'm not even talking to you, if you're seriously town here your head is so far up your butt it's insane
I think if Cinnamon was scum caught for the wrong reasons, he would’ve stopped interacting and arguing a long time ago.In post 891, Dannflor wrote:I'm just trying to figure out if Cinnamon's response to Chennis is more frustrated townie or a "scum caught for the wrong reasons" type deal
Yeah I find that to be the weirdest post in his ISO and the timing of it does no favors. I still think his tone is screaming town though.In post 940, chennisden wrote:i feel like cinnamon tried to discredit me to some extent when i pushed him and now that he's realized it's not working, he's vaguely trying to appeal to the towncore by saying stuff like "this is probably TvT lol wouldn't that be funny" while leaving his discrediting options open
Well for one, Chennis apparently has “reasons” to say the claim is realIn post 961, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 671, pisskop wrote:Exil is scum, when can you wagon him
Exil is apparently trying to shame people into voting.Why aren’t we lynching here again?In post 672, pisskop wrote:But i have done no reading to verify that.
That are based on setup speculation with no flips.In post 969, Dannflor wrote:Well for one, Chennis apparently has “reasons” to say the claim is realIn post 961, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 671, pisskop wrote:Exil is scum, when can you wagon him
Exil is apparently trying to shame people into voting.Why aren’t we lynching here again?In post 672, pisskop wrote:But i have done no reading to verify that.
If you want to look at marathons I have a couple, a WNAF with RC and a Lovers 6p with Oka. Outside of that, I don't.In post 949, Dannflor wrote:Cinnamon, do you have any completed scum games?